Advertisement

Scaling to the Organism: An Innovative Model of Dynamic Exposure Hotspots in Stream Systems

  • Kristen M. Harrigan
  • Paul A. Moore
Article

Abstract

In flowing systems, fluctuations in the frequency, magnitude, and duration of exposure occurs due to turbulence and geomorphology, causing spatial and temporal variations in chemical exposure at the scale of the organism. Spatial models representing toxicant distribution at the appropriate scales of stream organisms are noticeably missing from the literature. To characterize the fine scale distribution of pollutants in freshwater streams at the scale of a benthic organism, nine artificial stream habitats were created (riffle, pool, run, bend, woody debris) with either sand or gravel substrate. Dopamine was released as a chemical tracer, mimicking a groundwater source, and measurements were recorded with a microelectrode and Epsilon electrochemical recording system. Proxies for the frequency, magnitude, and duration of chemical exposure were extracted. Geographic information systems and an inverse distance weight interpolation technique were used to predict spatially the chemical distribution throughout the habitats. Spatial and temporal variations of exposure were exhibited within and across habitats, indicating that the frequency, magnitude, and duration of exposure is influenced by the organism’s location within a habitat and the habitat it resides in. The run and pool with sand substrate contained the greatest frequency, magnitude, and duration of exposure, suggesting a more detrimental exposure compared to other habitats. Differences in peak heights within and across habitats are orders of magnitude in value. Spatial and temporal fluctuations of fine scale exposure need to be considered in both ecotoxicology and water quality modeling to represent and understand the exposure of pollutants impacting benthic organisms.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Laboratory for Sensory Ecology for their assistance throughout this project and review of the manuscript. They also thank the University of Michigan Biological Station for use of facilities and funding through the Marian P. and David M. Gates Graduate Student Endowment Fund. Lastly, they thank the reviewers for their comments on this manuscript. Funding was provided by Bowling Green State University.

Supplementary material

244_2017_444_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 6330 kb)
244_2017_444_MOESM2_ESM.gif (2.4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (GIF 2425 kb)
244_2017_444_MOESM3_ESM.gif (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (GIF 1490 kb)

References

  1. Ahmed K, Parvin E, Islam M, Akter MS, Khan S, Al-Mamun H (2014) Lead-and cadmium-induced histopathological changes in gill, kidney, and liver tissue of freshwater climbing perch Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792). Chem Ecol 30:532–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arend KK, Beletsky D, DePinto JV, Ludsin SA, Roberts JJ, Rucinski DK, Scavia D, Schwab DJ, Hook TO (2011) Seasonal and interannual effects of hypoxia on fish habitat quality in central Lake Erie. Freshw Biol 56:366–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashauer R, Boxall A, Brown C (2006) Predicting effects on aquatic organisms from fluctuating or pulsed exposure to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1899–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson JF, Edwards WJ, Feng Y (2012) Physical measurements and nearshore nested hydrodynamic modeling for Lake Ontario nearshore nutrient study. J Great Lakes Res 38:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop C, Begley B, Nicholas C, Rader J, Reed E, Sykes K, Williams T, Young E, Mullen D (2008) Shelter-use and interactions between banded sculpin (Cottus carolinae) and bigclaw crayfish (Orconectes placidus) in stream-pool habitats. Southeast Nat 7:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brent RN, Herricks EE (1998) Postexposure effects of brief cadmium, zinc, and phenol exposures on freshwater organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:2091–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown AV, Brussock PP (1991) Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pools. Hydrobiologia 220:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunke M, Hoffman A, Pusch M (2001) Use of mesohabitat-specific relationships between flow velocity and river discharge to assess invertebrate minimum flow requirements. Regul River 17:667–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burgert S, Shafer RB, Foit K, Kattwinkel M, Metzeling L, MacEwan R, Kefford BJ, Liess M (2011) Modeling aquatic exposure and effects of insecticides—application to south-eastern Australia. Sci Total Environ 409:2807–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butcher J, Diamond J, Bearr J, Latimer H, Klaine SJ, Hoang T, Bowersox M (2006) Toxicity models of pulsed copper exposure to Pimephales promelas and Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2541–2550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camargo JA, Alonso A (2006) Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ Int 32:831–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR, Stanley EH, Zanden AJV (2011) State of the world’s freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark JM, Kershner MW, Montemarano JJ (2013) Habitat-specific effects of particle size, current velocity, water depth, and predation risk on size-dependent crayfish distribution. Hydrobiologia 716:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clements WH (2000) Integrating effects of contaminants across levels of biological organization: an overview. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recovery 7(2):113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clements WH, Rohr JR (2009) Community responses to contaminants: using basic ecological principles to predict ecotoxicological effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 28(9):1789–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crowder DW, Diplas P (2002) Vorticity and circulation: spatial metrics for evaluating flow complexity in stream habitats. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins KW (1962) An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. Am Midl Nat 67:477–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis JA (1986) Boundary layers, flow microenvironments and stream benthos. In: De Deckker P, Williams WD (eds) Limnology in Australia, 61st edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denny MW (1993) Air and water: the biology and physics of life’s media. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamond J, Bowersox M, Latimer H, Barbour C, Bearr J, Butcher J (2005) Effects of pulsed contaminant exposures on early life stages of the fathead minnow. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorigo U, Lefranc M, Leboulanger C, Montuelle B, Humbert J (2009) Spatial heterogeneity of periphytic microbial communities in a small pesticide-polluted river. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67:491–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards DD, Moore PA (2014) Real exposure: field measurement of chemical plumes in headwater streams. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 67:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.) (2002) ArcGIS 3D analyst: three-dimensional visualization, topographic analysis, and surface creation. ESRI White Paper. http://esrisingapore.com.sg/u/lib/esrisg/cms/arcgis-3d-analyst.pdf. Accessed Sept 2016
  24. Farag AM, Hull RN, Clements WH, Glomb S, Larson DL, Stahl R, Stauber J (2016) Restoration of impaired ecosystems: an ounce of prevention or a pound of cure? Introduction, overview, and key messages from a SETAC-SER workshop. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12(2):247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finelli CM (2000) Velocity and concentration distributions in turbulent odor plumes in the presence of vegetation mimics: a flume study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 207:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finelli CM, Pentcheff ND, Zimmer-Faust RK, Wethey DS (1999) Odor transport in turbulent flows: constraints on animal navigation. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1056–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Finelli CM, Pentcheff ND, Zimmer RK, Wethey DS (2000) Physical constraints on ecological processes: a field test of odor-mediated foraging. Ecology 81:784–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Finlay JC, Khandwala S, Power ME (2002) Spatial scales of carbon flow in a river food web. Ecology 83:1845–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fox J, Bouchet-Valat M (2017) Rcmdr: R Commander. R package vers 2.3-2Google Scholar
  30. Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD (1986) Hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manag 10:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gao X, Niu C, Chen Y, Yin X (2014) Spatial heterogeneity of stream environmental conditions and macroinvertebrates community in an agriculture dominated watershed and management implications for a large river (the Liao River, China) basin. Environ Monit Assess 186:2375–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Genkai-Kato M, Mitsuhashi H, Kohmatsu Y, Miyasaka H, Nozaki K, Nakanishi M (2005) A seasonal change in the distribution of a stream-dwelling stonefly nymph reflects oxygen supply and water flow. Ecol Res 20:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gnanachandrasamy G, Ramkumar T, Venkatramanan S, Vasudevan S, Chung SY, Bagyaraj M (2015) Accessing groundwater quality in lower part of Nagapattinam district, Southern India: using hydrogeochemistry and GIS interpolation techniques. Appl Water Sci 5:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gordon AK, Mantel SK, Muller NWJ (2012) Review of toxicological effects caused by episodic stressor exposure. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1169–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Granqvist M, Mattila J (2004) The effects of turbidity and light intensity on the consumption of mysids by juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis L.). Hydrobiologia 514:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Han H, Allan JD, Bosch NS (2012) Historical pattern of phosphorus loading to Lake Erie watersheds. J Great Lakes Res 38:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Handy RD (1994) Intermittent exposure to aquatic pollutants: assessment, toxicity and sublethal responses in fish and invertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol 107C:171–184Google Scholar
  38. Hanna-Attisha M, LaChance J, Sadler RC, Schnepp AC (2016) Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: a spatial analysis of risk and public health response. Am J Public Health 106:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hart DD, Finelli CM (1999) Physical-biological coupling in streams: the pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:363–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jackson JL, Webster DR, Rahman S, Weissburg MJ (2007) Bed-roughness effects on boundary-layer turbulence and consequences for odor-tracking behavior of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus). Limnol Oceanogr 52:1883–1897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jiang T, Zhong M, Cao Y, Zou L, Lin B, Zhu A (2016) Simulation of water quality under different reservoir regulation scenarios in the Tidal River. Water Resour Manag 30:3593–3607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson MF, Rice SP (2014) Animal perception in gravel-bed rivers: scales of sensing and environmental controls on sensory information. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:945–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jowett IG (1993) A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. NZ J Mar Freshw 27:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kattwinkel M, Kuhne J, Foit K, Liess M (2011) Climate change, agricultural insecticide exposure, and risk for freshwater communities. Ecol Appl 21:2068–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kjarandsen J (2005) Species assemblages and community structure of adult caddisflies along a headwater stream in southeastern Ghana (Insecta: Trichoptera). Biodivers Conserv 14:1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lahman SE, Moore PA (2015) Fine-scale chemical exposure differs in point and nonpoint source plumes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 68:729–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lam QD, Fohrer SN (2012) Assessing the spatial and temporal variations of water quality in lowland areas, northern Germany. J Hydrol 438–439:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lancaster J, Downes BJ, Arnold A (2010) Oviposition site selectivity of some stream-dwelling caddisflies. Hydrobiologia 652:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Larsson AI, Jonsson PR (2006) Barnacle larvae actively select flow environments supporting post-settlement growth and survival. Ecology 87:1960–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leon LF, Smith REH, Hipsey MR, Bocaniov SA, Higgins SN, Hecky RE, Antenucci JP, Imberger JA, Guildford SJ (2011) Application of a 3D hydrodynamic–biological model for seasonal and spatial dynamics of water quality and phytoplankton in Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 37:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li S, Duffy CJ (2012) Fully-coupled modeling of shallow water flow and pollutant transport on unstructured grids. Procedia Environ Sci 13:2098–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Li Y, Yao J (2015) Estimation of transport trajectory and residence time in large river–lake systems: application to Poyang Lake (China) using a combined model approach. Water 7:5203–5223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liber K, Goodfellow W, Den Besten P, Clements W, Galloway T, Gerhardt A, Green A, Simpson S (2007) In situ-based effects measures: considerations for improving methods and approaches. Int Environ Assess Man 3(2):246–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Logan P, Brooker MP (1983) The macroinvertebrate faunas of riffles and pools. Water Res 17:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ludington TS, Moore PA (2017) The degree of impairment of foraging in crayfish (Orconectes virilis) due to insecticide exposure is dependent upon turbulent dispersion. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 72:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malla MA, Rather MA, Teli MN, Kuchhay NA (2014) Comparison of spatial interpolation techniques—a case study of Anantnag District J&K, India. Int J Mod Eng Res 4:59–67Google Scholar
  57. Meissner K, Juntunen A, Malmqvist B, Muotka T (2009) Predator-prey interactions in a variable environment: responses of a caddis larva and its blackfly prey to variations in stream flow. Ann Zool Fennici 46:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moore PA, Atema J (1988) A model of a temporal filter in chemoreception to extract directional information from a turbulent odor plume. Biol Bull 174:335–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moore PA, Atema J (1991) Spatial information in the three-dimensional fine structure of an aquatic odor plume. Biol Bull 181:408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moore PA, Crimaldi J (2004) Odor landscape and animal behavior: tracking odor plumes in different physics worlds. J Marine Syst 49:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moore PA, Grills JL (1999) Chemical orientation to food by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus: influence of hydrodynamics. Anim Behav 58:953–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moore PA, Gerhardt GA, Atema J (1989) High-resolution spatio-temporal analysis of aquatic chemical signals using microelectrochemical electrodes. Chem Senses 14:829–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moore PA, Weissburg MJ, Parrish JM, Zimmer-faust RK, Gerhardt GA (1994) Spatial distribution of odors in simulated benthic boundary layer flows. J Chem Ecol 20:255–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mutz M (2000) Influences of woody debris on flow patterns and channel morphology in a low energy, sand-bed stream reach. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Neal AE, Moore PA (2017) Mimicking natural systems: changes in behavior as a result of dynamic exposure to naproxen. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 135:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Neves RJ, Widlak JC (1987) Habitat ecology of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a headwater stream in Virginia. Am Malacol Bull 5:1–7Google Scholar
  67. Nikolaidis C, Mandalos P, Vantarakis A (2008) Impact of intensive agricultural practices on drinking water quality in the EVROS Region (NE GREECE) by GIS analysis. Environ Monit Assess 143:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nowell ARM, Jumars PA (1987) Flumes: theoretical and experimental considerations for simulation of benthic environments. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 25:91–112Google Scholar
  69. Okubo A, Levin SA (2013) Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  70. Palaniappan PLRM, Sabhanayakam S, Krishnakumar N, Vadivelu M (2008) Morphological changes due to lead exposure and the influence of DMSA on the gill tissues of the freshwater fish, Catla catla. Food Chem Toxicol 46:2440–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pedersen ML, Friberg N (2009) Influence of disturbance on habitats and biological communities in lowland streams. Fund Appl Limnol 174:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Peterson JL, Jepson PC, Jenkins JJ (2001) Effect of varying pesticide exposure duration and concentration on the toxicity of carbaryl to two field-collected stream invertebrates, Calineuria californica (Plecoptera: Perlidae) and Cinygma sp. (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2215–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rabeni CF, Minshall GW (1977) Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rasmussen JJ, Wiberg-Larsen P, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Friberg N, Kronvang B (2012) Stream habitat structure influences macroinvertebrate response to pesticides. Environ Pollut 164:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  76. Reid MA, Thoms MC (2008) Surface flow types, near-bed hydraulics and the distribution of stream macroinvertebrates. Biogeosciences 5:1043–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sanford LP (1997) Turbulent mixing in experimental ecosystem studies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 161:265–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwab DJ, Beletsky D, DePinto J, Dolan DM (2009) A hydrodynamic approach to modeling phosphorus distribution in Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 35:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shomar B, Fakher SA, Yahya A (2010) Assessment of groundwater quality in the Gaza Strip, Palestine using GIS mapping. J Water Resour Prot 2:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smiley PC Jr, Dibble ED (2005) Implications of a hierarchical relationship among channel form, instream habitat, and stream communities for restoration of channelized streams. Hydrobiologia 548:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith RD, Sidle RC, Porter PE, Noel JR (1993) Effects of experimental removal of woody debris on the channel morphology of a forest, gravel-bed stream. J Hydrol 152:153–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thorne CR, Zevenbergen LW, Pitlick JC, Rais S, Bradley JB, Julien PY (1985) Direct measurements of secondary currents in a meandering sand-bed river. Nature 315:746–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD (2006) The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Res Appl 22:123–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thorp JH, Flotemersch JE, Williams BS, Gabanski LA (2013) Critical role for hierarchical geospatial analyses in the design of fluvial research, assessment, and management. Envion Monit Assess 185:7165–7180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tran D, Massabuau J, Garnier-Laplace J (2008) Impact of hypoxia on hemolymph contamination by uranium in an aquatic animal, the freshwater clam Corbicula fluminea. Environ Pollut 156:821–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Trolle D, Spigel B, Hamilton DP, Norton N, Sutherland D, Plew D, Allan MG (2014) Application of a three-dimensional water quality model as a decision support tool for the management of land-use changes in the catchment of an oligotrophic lake. Environ Manag 54:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007) National water quality inventory: report to congress; 2002 reporting cycle. Document No. EPA-841-R-07-001. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  88. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2009) National Water Quality Inventory: report to congress; 2004 reporting cycle. Document No. EPA-841-R-08-001. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  89. Vidon PGF, Hill AR (2004) Landscape controls on the hydrology of stream riparian zones. J Hydrol 292:210–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang X, Liu X (2016) Experimental investigation of flow structures and bed deformation with small width-to-depth ratio in a bend flume. KSCE J Civ Eng 20:497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Webster DR, Weissburg MJ (2009) The hydrodynamics of chemical cues among aquatic organisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 41:73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wolf MC, Martin AL, Simon JL, Bergner JL, Moore PA (2009) Chemosensory signals in stream habitats: implications for ecological interactions. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:560–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Worischka S, Koebsch C, Hellmann C, Winkelmann C (2012) Habitat overlap between predatory benthic fish and their invertebrate prey in streams: the relative influence of spatial and temporal factors on predation risk. Freshw Biol 57:2247–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhao Y, Newman MC (2006) Effects of exposure duration and recovery time during pulsed exposures. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1298–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Sensory Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences, J.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind, and BehaviorBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.University of Michigan Biological StationPellstonUSA

Personalised recommendations