The Effects of Biodiesel and Crude Oil on the Foraging Behavior of Rusty Crayfish, Orconectes rusticus

  • Ana M. Jurcak
  • Steven J. Gauthier
  • Paul A. Moore
Article

Abstract

Environmental pollutants, such as crude oil and other petroleum-based fuels, inhibit and limit an organism’s ability to perceive a chemical stimulus. Despite the increased use of alternative fuels, such as biodiesel, there have been few studies investigating the impact of these chemicals on the behavior of aquatic organisms. The purpose of this study was to compare the sublethal effects of biodiesel and crude oil exposure on chemically mediated behaviors in a freshwater keystone species. Crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) were tested on their ability to respond appropriately to a positive chemical stimulus within a Y-maze choice paradigm. Behavior was quantified by measuring time spent finding an odor source, duration of time spent at the odor source, percentage of crayfish that found the odor source, and percentage of crayfish that chose the correct arm of the arena. Results indicated negative impacts of both biodiesel and crude oil on the ability of crayfish to locate the food source. However, there were no significant differences between behavioral performances when crayfish were exposed to crude oil compared with biodiesel. Thus, biodiesel and crude oil have equally negative effects on the chemosensory behavior of crayfish. These findings indicate that biodiesel has the potential to have similar negative ecological impacts as other fuel source toxins.

Keywords

Metolachlor Odor Source Fuel Source Food Stimulus Momot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Laboratory for Sensory Ecology for their assistance in experimental set-up and review of this manuscript. We also thank four anonymous reviewers for their review of this manuscript.

References

  1. Abjornsson K, Wagner BMA, Axelsson A, Bjerselius R, Olsén KH (1997) Responses of Acilius sulcatus (Coleoptera: Dystiscidea) to chemical cues from perch (Perca fluviatilis). Oceologia 111:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams JA, Tuchman NC, Moore PA (2005) Effects of CO2-altered detritus on growth and chemically-mediated decisions in crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). J North Am Benthol Soc 24:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akaishi FM, Silva de Assis HC, Jakobi SCG, Eiras-Stofella DR, St-Jean SD, Courtenay SC et al (2004) Morphological and neurotoxicological findings in tropical freshwater fish (Astyanax sp.) after waterborne and acute exposure to water soluble fraction (WSF) of crude oil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46:244–253Google Scholar
  4. Atema J, Stein L (1974) Effects of crude oil on the feeding behavior of the lobster Homarus americanus. Environ Pollut 6:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atema J, Karnofsky EB, Olesko-Szuts S (1982) Sublethal effects of number 2 fuel oil on lobster behavior and chemoreception. Report of project Grand No. R-803833 (USEPA project)Google Scholar
  6. Bajapi D, Tyagi VK (2006) Biodiesel: Source, production, composition, properties, and its benefits. J Oleo Sci 55(10):487–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws G, Moore PA (2003) Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 140:805–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blinova NK, Cherkashin SA (2012) The olfactory system of crustaceans as a model for ecologo-toxicological studies. J Evol Biochem Physiol 48(2):155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumer M, Hunt JM, Atema J, Stein L (1973) Interaction between marine organisms and oil pollution. USEPA Ecological Research Series R3-73-042Google Scholar
  10. Bodammer JE (1979) Preliminary observations on the cytopathological effects of copper sulfate on the chemoreceptors of Callinectes sapidus. In: Vernberg WB (ed) Marine pollution: Functional responses. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd CE, Massaut L (1999) Risks associated with the use of chemicals in pond aquaculture. Aquac Eng 20:113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bozbas K (2008) Biodiesel as an alternative motor fuel: production and policies in the European Union. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:542–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brody TM, Di Bianca P, Krysa J (2012) Analysis of inland crude oil spill threats, vulnerabilities, and emergency response in the Midwest United States. Risk Anal 32:1741–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Browne AM, Moore PA (2014) The effects of sublethal levels of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetc acid herbicide (2,4-D) on feeding behavior of the crayfish O. rusticus. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 67:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bucas G, Saliot A (2002) Sea transport of animal and vegetable oils and its environmental consequences. Mar Pollut Bull 44:1388–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burns KA, Garrity SD, Levings SC (1993) How many years until mangrove ecosystems recover from catastrophic oil spills? Mar Pollut Bull 26(5):239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Camargo JA, Alonso Á (2006) Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ Int 32:831–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carman KR, Fleeger JW, Pomarico SM (1997) Response of a benthic food web to hydrocarbon contamination. Sci Total Environ 42(3):561–571Google Scholar
  19. Carr WES, Derby CD (1986) Chemically stimulated feeding behavior in marine animals. Importance of chemical mixtures and involvement of mixture interactions. J Chem Ecol 12(5):990–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charlebois PM, Lamberti GA (1996) Invading crayfish in a Michigan stream: direct and indirect effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc 15(4):551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooper JCB (2003) Price elasticity of demand for crude oil: Estimates for 23 countries. OPEC Rev 1–8Google Scholar
  22. Covich AP, Palmer MA, Crowl TA (1999) The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems. Bioscience 49(2):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crunkilton RL, Duchrow RM (1990) Impact of a massive crude oil spill on the invertebrate fauna of a Missouri Ozark stream. Envrion Pollut 63:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Lange HJ, Noordoven W, Murk A, Lurling M, Peeters E (2006) Behavioral responses of Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to low concentrations of pharmaceuticals. Aquat Toxicol 78:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Demirbas A (2003) Biodiesel fuels from vegetable oils by way of catalytic and noncatalytic supercritical alcohol transesterifications and other methods: a survey. Energy Convers Manag 44:2093–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Demirbas A (2007) Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy 35:4661–4670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flint RW, Goldman CR (1975) The effects of a benthic grazer on the primary productivity of the littoral zone of Lake Tahoe. Limnol Oceanogr 20(6):935–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franklin FL, Lloyd R (1982) The toxicity of twenty-five oils in relation to the MAFF dispersant tests. Fisheries Research Technical Report, 70. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Directorate of Fisheries Research, Lowestoft, UK, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  29. Frittelli J, Andrews A, Parfomak PW, Pirog R, Ramseur JL, Ratner M (2014) U.S. rail transportation of crude oil: Background and issues for congress. CRS Report, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  30. Gill RA, Robotham PWJ (1989) Input, behavior, and fates of petroleum hydrocarbons and their residues. In: Green J, Trett MW (eds) The fate and effects of oil in freshwater. Elsevier, London, pp 11–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hanazato T (1998) Response of a zooplankton community to insecticide application in experimental ponds: a review and the implications of the effects of chemicals on the structure and functioning of freshwater communities. Environ Pollut 101:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hazlett B (1994) Alarm responses in the crayfish Orconectes virilis and Orconectes propinquus. J Chem Ecol 20:1525–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hazlett BA (1999) Responses to multiple chemical cues by the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Behaviour 136:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hazlett BA, Schoolmaster DR (1998) Responses of cambarid crayfish to predator odor. J Chem Ecol 24:1757–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hollebone B, Fieldhouse B, Landriault M (2007) Aqueous solubility, dispersibility and toxicity of biodiesels. In: Artic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical Seminar 1:227–244Google Scholar
  36. Januan J, Ellis EN (2010) Perspectives on biodiesel as a sustainable fuel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:1312–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Julliard AK, Saucier D, Astic L (1993) Effects of chronic low-level copper expo- sure on ultrastructure of the olfactory system in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Histol Histopathol 8:655–672Google Scholar
  38. Keller TA, Moore PA (1999) Context-specific behavior: crayfish size influences crayfish-fish interactions. J North Am Benthol Soc 19:344–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keller T, Tomba A, Moore PA (2001) Orientation in complex chemical landscapes: spatial arrangement of chemical sources influences crayfish food-finding efficiency in artificial streams. Limnol Oceanogr 46(2):238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khan N, Warith MA, Luk G (2007) A comparison of acute toxicity of biodiesel, biodiesel blends, and diesel on aquatic organisms. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 57:286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lahman SE, Trent KR, Moore PA (2015) Sublethal copper toxicity impairs chemical orientation in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leite MBNL, De Arau´jo MMS, Nascimento IA, Cruz ACS, Pereira AS, Nascimento NC (2011) Toxicity of water-soluble fractions of biodiesel fueled derived from castor oil, palm oil, and waste cooking oil. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loya Y, Rinkevich B (1980) Effects of oil pollution on coral reef communities. Mar Ecol 3:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma F, Hanna MA (1999) Biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour Technol 70:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maugh TH (1978) How many chemicals are there? Science 199:162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McKelvey RW, Robertson I, Whiteheads PE (1980) Effect of nonpetroleum oil spills on wintering birds near Vancouver. Mar Pollut Bull 11:169–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Momot WT (1995) Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems. Rev Fish Sci 3:33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Momot WT, Gowing H, Jones PD (1978) The dynamics of crayfish and their role in ecosystems. Am Midl Nat 99:10–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore PA, Grills JL (1999) Chemical orientation to food by crayfish Orconectes rusticus: influence by hydrodynamics. Anim Behav 58:953–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhara H (1999) Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80(7):2435–2441Google Scholar
  51. Olden JD, McCarthy JM, Maxted JF, Fetzer MW, Vander Zanden MJ (2006) The rapid spread of rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) with observations on native crayfish declines in Wisconsisn (USA) over the past 130 years. Biol Inv 8:1621–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Olsén KH (2011) Effects of pollutants on olfactory mediated behaviors in fish and crustaceans. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 507–529Google Scholar
  53. Pace CB, Clark JR, Bragin GE (1995) Comparing crude oil toxicity under standard and environmentally realistic exposures. In: Proceedings of the International Oil Spill Conference, Long Beach, CA, February 27 to March 2, pp 1003–1004Google Scholar
  54. Pinto AC, Guarieiro LL, Rezende MJ, Ribeiro NM, Torres EA, Lopes WA et al (2005) Biodiesel: an overview. J Braz Chem Soc 16(6B):1313–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poon R, Valli V, Rigden M, Rideout G, Pelletier G (2009) Short-term oral toxicity of three biodiesels and an ultra-low sulfur diesel in male rates. Food Chem Toxicol 47:1416–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodrigues RV, Miranda-Filho KC, Gusmão EP, Moreira CB, Romano LA, Sampaio LA (2010) Deleterious effects of water-soluble fraction of petroleum, diesel and gasoline on marine pejerry Odontesthes argentinensis larvae. Sci Total Environ 408:2054–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sargain P, Mostajir B, Chatila K, Ferreyra GA, Pelletier E, Demers S (2005) Nonsynergistic effects of water-soluble crude oil and enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation on a natural plankton assemblage. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shave CR, Townsend CR, Crowl TA (1994) Antipredator behaviours of a freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) to a native and introduced predator. N Z J Ecol 18(1):1–10Google Scholar
  59. Sherba M, Dunham DW, Harvey HH (2000) Sublethal copper toxicity and food response in the freshwater crayfish Cambarus bartonii (Cambaridae, Decapoda, Crustacea). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simon TP, Morris CC (2009) Biological response signature of oil brine threats, sediment contaminants, and crayfish assemblages in an Indiana watershed, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:96–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singer MM, Smalheer DL, Tjeerdema RS, Martin M (1991) Effects of spiked exposure to an oil dispersant on the early life stages of four marine species. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1367–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singer MM, George S, Lee I, Jacobson S, Weetman LL, Blondina G et al (1998) Effects of dispersant treatment on the acute aquatic toxicity of petroleum hydrocarbons. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 34:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stein RA (1977) Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58:1237–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stein RA, Magnuson JJ (1976) Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57:751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stiver W, MacKay D (1984) Evaporation rate of spills of hydrocarbons and petroleum mixtures. Environ Sci Technol 18:834–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suchanek TH (1993) Oil impacts on marine invertebrate populations and communities. Am Zool 33:510–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tierney KB, Baldwin DH, Hara TJ, Ross PS, Scholz NL, Kennedy CJ (2010) Olfactory toxicity in fishes. Aquat Toxicol 96:2–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Usio N (2000) Effects of crayfish on leaf processing and invertebrate colonization of leaves in a headwater stream: decoupling of a trophic cascade. Oecologia 124:608–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Usio K, Townsend CR (2004) Roles of crayfish: consequences of predation and bioturbation for stream invertebrates. Ecology 85(3):807–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Webster DR, Weissburg MJ (2009) The hydrodynamics of chemical cues among aquatic organisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 41:73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williamson CE, Morris DP, Pace ML, Olson OG (1999) Dissolved organic carbon and nutrients as regulators of lake ecosystem: resurrection of a more integrated paradigm. Limnol Oceanogr 44:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wisenden BD (2000) Olfactory assessment of predation in the aquatic environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 355:1205–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wolf MC, Moore PA (2002) Effects of the herbicide metolachlor on the perception of chemical stimuli by Orconectes rusticus. J North Am Benthol Soc 3:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yoshioka G, Carpenter M (2002) Characteristics of reported inland and coastal oil spills. USEPA Archive DocumentGoogle Scholar
  75. Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  76. Zulandt Schneider R, Schneider RWS, Moore PA (1999) Recognition of dominance status by chemoreception in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J Chem Ecol 25:781–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana M. Jurcak
    • 1
  • Steven J. Gauthier
    • 1
  • Paul A. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Sensory Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences, J. P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind, and BehaviorBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations