Advertisement

Seasonal and Diurnal Variation of Organic Ultraviolet Filters from Personal Care Products Used Along the Japanese Coast

  • Kenshi Sankoda
  • Kotaro Murata
  • Mai Tanihata
  • Kengo Suzuki
  • Kei Nomiyama
  • Ryota Shinohara
Article

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the behavior of organic ultraviolet (UV) filters released by recreational activities along the Japanese coastline. Seasonal variations of organic UV filters in seawater were investigated at four different recreational beaches (Mogushi, Wakamiya, Tsurugahama, and Otachimisaki beaches) in both summer (July through August) and winter (December). Moreover, short time scale diurnal changes were monitored at Otachimisaki beach in summer. Of the four sunscreen agents tested in this study, two agents—2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC) and 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS)—were detected in all samples, whereas octyl-dimethyl-p-aminobenzonic acid and 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)-camphor were lower than detection limits. In particular, EHMC, one of the most popular organic UV filters, was dominant. The highest concentration of EHMC was observed at 1,080 ng L−1, a level that exceeds those of previous studies. Both EHMC and EHS concentrations showed significant (p < 0.05) seasonal variations with advancing summer suggesting direct input from recreational activities. The subsequent examination showed short time scale diurnal changes of organic UV filters on the beach. The results showed that diurnal changes in EHMC concentrations were correlated to the number of bathers. EHMC concentrations increased during the afternoon and decreased during the night, although complete attenuation during the night did not occur. EHMC persists along the coast due to low mobility and may persist the next day. This is the first study to show the natural attenuation behavior of organic UV filters along recreational beaches.

Keywords

Beach Diurnal Variation Artificial Seawater Chemical Abstract Service Recreational Beach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on this study. We also thank professor Jun Kobayashi (Prefectural University of Kumamoto, Japan), Rumi Tanoue (Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Japan), and all colleagues of the Water Environment Research Laboratory (Prefectural University of Kumamoto) for their great contributions during the sampling campaign.

References

  1. Amine H, Gomez E, Halwani J, Casellas C, Fenet H (2012) UV filters, ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, octocrylene and ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA from untreated wastewater in sediment from eastern Mediterranean river transition and coastal zones. Mar Pollut Bull 64:2435–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachelot M, Li Z, Munaron D, Le Gall P, Casellas C, Fenet H et al (2012) Organic UV filter concentrations in marine mussels from French coastal regions. Sci Total Environ 420:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmer ME, Buser H-R, Müller MD, Poiger T (2005) Occurrence of some organic UV filters in wastewater, in surface waters, and in fish from Swiss lakes. Environ Sci Technol 39:953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron E, Gago-Ferrero P, Gorga M, Rudolph I, Mendoza G, Zapata AM et al (2013) Occurrence of hydrophobic organic pollutants (BFRs and UV-filters) in sediments from South America. Chemosphere 92:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buser HR, Balmer ME, Schmid P, Kohler M (2006) Occurrence of UV filters 4-methylbenzylidene camphor and octocrylene in fish from various Swiss rivers with inputs from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 40:1427–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuderman P, Heath E (2007) Determination of UV filters and antimicrobial agents in environmental water samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1343–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C, Giovannelli D, Damiani E, Astolfi P et al (2008) Sunscreens cause coral bleaching by promoting viral infections. Environ Health Perspect 116:441–447Google Scholar
  8. Díaz-Cruz MS, Gago-Ferrero P, Llorca M, Barceló D (2012) Analysis of UV filters in tap water and other clean waters in Spain. Anal Bioanal Chem 402:2325–2333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fent K, Zenker A, Rapp M (2010) Widespread occurrence of estrogenic UV-filters in aquatic ecosystems in Switzerland. Environ Pollut 158:1817–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gago-Ferrero P, Diaz-Cruz MS, Barcelo D (2011) Occurrence of multiclass UV filters in treated sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 84:1158–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gago-Ferrero P, Alonso MB, Bertozzi CP, Marigo J, Barbosa L, Cremer M et al (2013) First determination of UV filters in marine mammals. Octocrylene levels in Franciscana dolphins. Environ Sci Technol 47:5619–5625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giokas DL, Sakkas VA, Albanis TA, Lampropoulou DA (2005) Determination of UV-filter residues in bathing waters by liquid chromatography UV-diode array and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry after micelle mediated extraction-solvent back extraction. J Chromatogr A 1077:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goksøyr A, Tollefsen KE, Grung M, Løken K, Lie E, Zenker A et al (2009) Balsa raft crossing the Pacific finds low contaminant levels. Environ Sci Technol 43:4783–4790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikarashi Y, Yamada M, Uchino T, Tokunaga H (2007) Simultaneous determination of 9 ultraviolet absorbers in cosmetics by high-performance liquid chromatography. Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku 125:65–71 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Inui M, Adachi T, Takenaka S, Inui H, Nakazawa M, Ueda M et al (2003) Effect of UV screens and preservatives on vitellogenin and choriogenin production in male medaka (Oryzias latipes). Toxicology 194:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kameda Y, Kimura K, Miyazaki M (2011) Occurrence and profiles of organic sun-blocking agents in surface waters and sediments in Japanese rivers and lakes. Environ Pollut 159:1570–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunz PY, Fent K (2006a) Estrogenic activity of UV filter mixtures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 217:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunz PY, Fent K (2006b) Multiple hormonal activities of UV filters and comparison of in vivo and in vitro estrogenic activity of ethyl-4-aminobenzoate in fish. Aquat Toxicol 79:305–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunz PY, Galicia HF, Fent K (2006) Comparison of in vitro and in vivo estrogenic activity of UV filters in fish. Toxicol Sci 90:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Langford K, Thomas KV (2008) Inputs of chemicals from recreational activities into the Norwegian coastal zone. J Environ Monit 10:894–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li W, Ma Y, Guo C, Hu W, Liu K, Wang Y et al (2007) Occurrence and behavior of four of the most used sunscreen UV filters in a wastewater reclamation plant. Water Res 41:3506–3512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2000) Standards for cosmetics. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-11120000-Iyakushokuhinkyoku/0000032704.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  23. Nakata H, Murata S, Filatreau J (2009) Occurrence and concentrations of benzotriazole UV Stabilizers in marine organisms and sediments from the Ariake Sea. Jpn Environ Sci Technol 43:6920–6926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakata H, Shinohara R-I, Murata S, Watanabe M (2010) Detection of benzotriazole UV stabilizers in the blubber of marine mammals by gas chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (GC–HRMS). J Environ Monit 12:2088–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakata H, Shinohara R, Nakazawa Y, Isobe T, Sudaryanto A, Subramanian A et al (2012) Asia–Pacific mussel watch for emerging pollutants: distribution of synthetic musks and benzotriazole UV stabilizers in Asian and US coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 64:2211–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen LN, Hai FI, Yang S, Kang J, Leusch FDL, Roddick F et al (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones, phytoestrogens, UV-filters, industrial chemicals and pesticides by Trametes versicolor: role of biosorption and biodegradation. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 88:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plagellat C, Kupper T, Furrer R, de Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Tarradellas J (2006) Concentrations and specific loads of UV filters in sewage sludge originating from a monitoring network in Switzerland. Chemosphere 62:915–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlumpf M, Cotton B, Conscience M, Haller V, Steinmann B, Lichtensteiger W (2001) In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens. Environ Health Perspect 109:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (2005) Environmental organic chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley-Intersciences, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  30. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Estimation program interface (EPI) suite, 4.10th edn. USEPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Wijekoon KC, Hai FI, Kang J, Price WE, Guo W, Ngo HH et al (2013) The fate of pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones, phytoestrogens, UV-filters and pesticides during MBR treatment. Bioresour Technol 144:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Z, Ren N, Li YF, Kunisue T, Gao D, Kannan K (2011) Determination of benzotriazole and benzophenone UV filters in sediment and sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 45:391–3909Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenshi Sankoda
    • 1
  • Kotaro Murata
    • 1
  • Mai Tanihata
    • 2
  • Kengo Suzuki
    • 1
  • Kei Nomiyama
    • 3
  • Ryota Shinohara
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental and Symbiotic SciencesPrefectural University of KumamotoKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Environmental and Symbiotic SciencesPrefectural University of KumamotoKumamotoJapan
  3. 3.Center for Marine Environmental Studies (CMES)Ehime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations