Letter to the Editor
- 122 Downloads
This letter to the editor explains why the results presented in “Crane (Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 66:176–200, Crane 2014)” does not support the hypothesis that refined tar sealers (RTS) are a significant source of PAHs in urban sediments. Additional analysis of Crane’s data indicates that sediment chemistry can be explained in the absence of RTS.
KeywordsPAHs Source Input Principal Component Analysis Plot Source Profile Chemical Mass Balance
Kirk O’Reilly has received funding from the Pavement Coatings Technology Council.
- Boehm PD (2006) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In: Morrison R, Murphy B (eds) Environmental forensics—a contaminant-specific approach. Elsevier, New York, p 315Google Scholar
- Minn. Stat. §116.202 (2013) Coal tar sealant use and sale prohibitedGoogle Scholar
- Van Metre PC, Mahler BJ, Wilson JT, Burbank TL (2008) Collection and analysis of samples for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in dust and other solids related to sealed and unsealed pavement from 10 cities across the United States, 2005–07. U S Geol Surv Data Ser, 361Google Scholar