Advertisement

Responses of Phytoplankton and Hyalella azteca to Agrichemical Mixtures in a Constructed Wetland Mesocosm

  • Richard E. LizotteJr.Email author
  • Sam TestaIII
  • Martin A. Locke
  • R. Wade SteinriedeJr.
Article

Abstract

We assessed the capability of a constructed wetland to mitigate toxicity of a variety of possible mixtures, such as nutrients only (NO) (nitrogen [N], phosphorus [P]), pesticides only (PO) (atrazine, S-metolachlor, permethrin), and nutrients + pesticides on phytoplankton chlorophyll-a, on 48-h aqueous Hyalella azteca survival and 10-day sediment H. azteca survival and growth. Water and sediment were collected at 10-, 20-, and 40-m distances from inflow and analyzed for nutrients, pesticides, chlorophyll-a, and H. azteca laboratory bioassays. Phytoplankton chlorophyll-a increased 4- to 10 -fold at 7 days after NO treatment. However, responses of chlorophyll-a to PO and nutrients + pesticides were more complex with associated decreases at only 20 m for pesticides only and 10 and 40 m for nutrients + pesticides treatments. H. azteca aqueous survival decreased within the first 48 h of dosing at 10- and 20-m distances during PO and nutrients + pesticides treatments in association with permethrin concentrations. H. azteca sediment survival was unaffected, whereas 10-day growth decreased within 1 day of dosing at all sites during nutrients + pesticides treatment. Constructed wetlands were shown to be an effective agricultural best-management tool for trapping pollutants and mitigating ecological impacts of run-off in agricultural watersheds.

Keywords

Phytoplankton Atrazine Phytoplankton Growth Rate Autumnal Equinox Hyalella Azteca 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank John Massey, Lisa Brooks and Renée Russell for assistance with logistics, sample collection, and analysis. Mention of equipment, computer programs, or a chemical does not constitute an endorsement for use by the United States Department of Agriculture nor does it imply pesticide registration under FIFRA as amended. The United States Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity employer.

Supplementary material

244_2013_9927_MOESM1_ESM.doc (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 38 kb)

References

  1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson BS, Hunt JW, Phillips BM, Nicely PA, de Vlaming V, Connor V et al (2003) Integrated assessment of the impacts of agricultural drainwater in the Salinas River (California, USA). Environ Pollut 124:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankley GT, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Monson PD (1995) Influence of pH and hardness on toxicity of ammonia to the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2078–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellinger EG, Sigee DC (2010) Freshwater algae: identification and use as bioindicators. Wiley-Blackwell, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett ER, Moore MT, Cooper CM, Smith S (2000) Method for the simultaneous extraction and analysis of two current use pesticides, atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin, in sediment and aquatic plants. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 64:825–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berenson ML, Levine DM, Goldstein M (1983) Intermediate statistical methods and applications: a computer package approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouldin JL, Farris JL, Moore MT, Smith S, Cooper CM (2007) Assessment of diazinon toxicity in sediment and water of constructed wetlands using deployed Corbicula fluminea and laboratory testing. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 53:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braskerud BC (2002) Factors affect phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution. Ecol Eng 19:41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budd R, O’Geen A, Goh KS, Bondarenko S, Gan J (2009) Efficacy of constructed wetlands in pesticide removal from tailwaters in the Central Valley, California. Environ Sci Technol 43:2925–2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cairns J (2007) The role of constructed ecosystems in an era of rapid climate change. Asian J Exp Sci 21(1):1–12Google Scholar
  11. Carroll KJ (2003) On the use of the Weibull model in analysis of survival data. Control Clin Trials 24(6):682–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Detenbeck NE, Hermanutz R, Allen K, Swift MC (1996) Fate and effects of the herbicide atrazine in flow-through wetland mesocosms. Environ Toxicol Chem 15(6):937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Díaz FJ, O’Geen AT, Dahlgren RA (2012) Agricultural pollutant removal by constructed wetlands: implications for water management and design. Agric Water Manag 104:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairchild JF, Albert AL, Sappington LC, Waddell B (2005) Chronic toxicity of un-ionized ammonia to early life stages of endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus Lucius) and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) compared to the surrogate fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Lledó A, Ruiz-Rueda O, Vilar-Sanz A, Sala L, Bañeras L (2011) Nitrogen removal efficiencies in a free water surface constructed wetland in relation to plant coverage. Ecol Eng 37:678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson BT (1986) Potential impact of selected agricultural chemical contaminants on a northern prairie wetland: a microcosm evaluation. Environ Toxicol Chem 5:473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerr DR, Meador JP (1996) Modelling dose-response using generalized linear models. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirk JTO (2011) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu H, Xiong M (2009) Comparative toxicity of racemic metolachlor and S-metolachlor to Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Aquat Toxicol 93:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lizotte RE, Moore MT, Locke MA, Kröger R (2011) Effects of vegetation in mitigating the toxicity of pesticide mixtures in sediments of a wetland mesocosm. Water Air Soil Pollut 220:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  22. Moorman TB, Hatfield JL, Kanwar RS (2004) Herbicide and nitrate in surface and groundwater: results from the Iowa Management Systems Evaluation Area. In: Nett MT, Locke MA, Pennington DA (eds) Water quality assessments in the Mississippi Delta. ACS Symposium Series 877, Washington DC, pp. 235–250Google Scholar
  23. Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comín FA, Yockteng R (2012) Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10(1):e1001247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Agricultural Statistical Service (2013) Chemical use data in quick stats 2.0: 2010 Corn, upland cotton, fall potatoes. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Pre-Defined_Queries/2010_Corn_Upland_Cotton_Fall_Potatoes/index.asp. Accessed 6 May 2013
  25. Pape-Lindstrom PA, Lydy MJ (1997) Synergistic toxicity of atrazine and organophosphate insecticides contravenes the response addition mixture model. Environ Toxicol Chem 16(11):2415–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips BM, Anderson BS, Hunt JW, Huntley SA, Tjeerdema RS, Kapellas N et al (2006) Solid-phase toxicity identification evaluation in an agricultural stream. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(6):1671–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ralston-Hooper K, Hardy J, Hahn L, Ochoa-Acuña H, Lee LS, Mollenhauer R et al (2009) Acute and chronic toxicity of atrazine and its metabolites deethylatrazine and deisopropylatrazine on aquatic organisms. Ecotoxicology 18:899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reynolds CS (2006) Ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson GP, Vitousek PM (2009) Nitrogen in agriculture: balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:97–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schaff SD, Pezeshki SR, Shields FD (2003) Effects of soil conditions on survival and growth of black willow cuttings. Environ Manag 31:748–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schulz R, Peall SKC (2001) Effectiveness of a constructed wetland for retention of nonpoint- source pesticide pollution in the Lourens River catchment, South Africa. Environ Sci Technol 35:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schulz R, Moore MT, Bennett ER, Milam CD, Bouldin JL, Farris JL et al (2003) Acute toxicity of methyl-parathion in wetland mesocosms: assessing the influence of aquatic plants using laboratory testing with Hyalella azteca. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith S, Cooper CM, Lizotte RE, Locke MA, Knight SS (2007) Pesticides in lake water in the Beasley Lake watershed, 1998–2005. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 33(1):61–71Google Scholar
  34. Soucek DJ, Dickinson A (2012) Acute toxicity of nitrate and nitrite to sensitive freshwater insects, mollusks, and a crustacean. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 62:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Southwick LM, Grigg BC, Fouss JL, Kornecki TS (2003) Atrazine and metolachlor in surface run-off and under typical rainfall conditions in southern Louisiana. J Agric Food Chem 51:5355–5361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Systat Software (SYSTAT) (2011) SigmaPlot v.12.0 user’s guide: Part 1. Systat Software, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(50):20260–20264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ToxCalc (2008) ToxCalc users guide: comprehensive toxicity data analysis and database software, version 5.0.32. Tidepool Scientific Software, McKinleyvilleGoogle Scholar
  39. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates EPA 600/R-99/064. USEPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. EPA 821-R-02-012. USEPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Valloton N, Eggen RIL, Escher BI, Krayenbühl J, Chèvre N (2008) Effect of a pulse herbicidal exposure on Scenedesmus vacuolatus: a comparison of two photosynthetic inhibitors. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(6):1399–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waiser MJ, Robarts RD (1997) Impacts of herbicide and fertilizers on the microbial community of a saline prairie lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:320–329Google Scholar
  43. Wan MT, Buday C, Schroeder G, Kuo J, Pasternak J (2006) Toxicity of Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca, Oncorhynchus kisutch, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and Rana catesbeiana of atrazine, metolachlor, simazine, and their formulated products. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 76:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wendt-Rasch L, Van den Brink PJ, Crum SJH, Woin P (2004) The effects of a pesticide mixture on aquatic ecosystems differing in trophic status: responses of the macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum and the periphytic algal community. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 27:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wheelock CE, Miller JL, Miller MJ, Phillips BM, Gee SJ, Tjeerdema RS et al (2005) Influence of container adsorption upon observed pyrethroid toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyalella azteca. Aquat Toxicol 74:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. LizotteJr.
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sam TestaIII
    • 1
  • Martin A. Locke
    • 1
  • R. Wade SteinriedeJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.National Sedimentation LaboratoryUSDA-ARS OxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations