Vanadium Pentoxide Phytotoxicity: Effects of Species Selection and Nutrient Concentration

Article

Abstract

Vanadium concentrations in soil can be increased through anthropogenic inputs and can be harmful to plants. A Petri dish experiment was conducted to assess the effect of vanadium toxicity on the germination and survival of the garden lettuce, Lactuca sativa. A second study was conducted in a greenhouse to investigate the influence of species selection and nutrient concentration on the toxicity of vanadium pentoxide to plants. L. sativa and four non-crop native plant species, two grasses (Elymus virginicus and Panicum virgatum) and two broad-leaved species (Lycopus americanus and Prunella vulgaris) were selected. Artificial soil was used in both experiments, and a geometric progression of five vanadium concentrations plus controls was selected for the soil treatments. Results of the Petri dish experiment showed that seedling survival is a less sensitive end point than above-ground dry weight (DW) as measured in the greenhouse experiment. Nutrient level (100, 10, and 1 kg/ha) was found to strongly influence vanadium toxicity in the greenhouse study. At 100 kg/ha, plant tolerance to vanadium was greatest, as indicated by higher no-observed, lowest-observed, and percentage effect concentration values. Results showed that forbs (L. americanus and P. vulgaris) tended to be more sensitive than both the crop (L. sativa) and grasses (E. virginicus and P. virgatum) at high concentrations of vanadium. Soil concentrations resulting in a 25 % decrease in shoot DW were generally less than the Canadian soil quality guideline for vanadium, suggesting that 130 mg/kg may not be protective of the Canadian native plant species used in this study.

Supplementary material

244_2012_9806_MOESM1_ESM.doc (90 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 90 kb)

References

  1. Aldenberg T, Slob W (1993) Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 25:48–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anke MK (2004) Elements and their compounds in the environment. In: Merian E, Anke M, Ihnat M, Stoeppler M (eds) Vanadium, 2nd edn. WILEY-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  3. Bache CA, Rutzke M, Lisk DJ (1991) Absorption of vanadium, nickel, aluminum and molybdenum by Swiss chard grown on soil amended with oil fly ash or bottom ash. J Food Saf 12:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basta NT, Ryan JA, Chaney RL (2005) Trace element chemistry in residual-treated soil: key concepts and metal bioavailability. J Environ Qual 34:49–63Google Scholar
  5. Bellenger JP, Wichard T, Kustka AB, Kraepiel AML (2008) Uptake of molybdenum and vanadium by a nitrogen-fixing soil bacterium using siderophores. Nature Geosci 1:243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutin C, Carpenter C, Thomas P (2012a) Lanthanum chloride (LaCl3): effects on crops and selected native plant species. Report produced for the Inorganic Units, Ecological Assessment Division, Science and Technology BranchGoogle Scholar
  7. Boutin C, Carpenter C, Thomas P, Allison J (2012b) Yttrium chloride (YCl3): effects on crops and selected native plant species. Report produced for the Inorganic Units, Ecological Assessment Division, Science and Technology BranchGoogle Scholar
  8. Boutin C, Aya KL, Carpenter D, Thomas PJ, Rowland O (2012c) Phytotoxicity testing for herbicide regulation: shortcomings in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services in agrarian systems. Sci Total Environ 415:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman BJ (1983) Vanadate uptake in Neurospora crassa occurs via phosphate transport system II. J Bacteriol 153:286–291Google Scholar
  10. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (1999) Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health: vanadium (1997). In: Canadian environmental guidelines, 1999. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantley LC Jr, Josephson L, Warner R, Yanagisawa M, Lechene C, Guidotti G (1977) Vanadate is a potent (Na, K)-ATPase inhibitor found in ATP derived from muscle. Biol Chem 252:7421–7423Google Scholar
  12. Cappuyns V, Slabbinck E (2012) Occurrence of vanadium in Belgian and European alluvial soils. Appl Environ Soil Sci. doi:10.1155/2012/979501
  13. Carpenter D, Boutin C (2010) Sublethal effects of the herbicide glufosinate ammonium on crops and wild plants: short-term effects compared to vegetative recovery and plant reproduction. Ecotoxicology 19:1322–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark J, Ortego LS, Fairbrother A (2004) Sources of variability in plant toxicity testing. Chemosphere 57:1599–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Efroymson RA, Will ME, Suter GW II, Wooten AC (1997) Toxicological benchmarks for screening contaminants of potential concern for effects on terrestrial plants: 1997 revision. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. ES/ER/TM-85/R3. Available at: http://www.esd.ornl.gov/programs/ecorisk/documents/tm85r3.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2012
  16. Environment Canada (1999) Canadian soil quality guidelines for vanadium. Scientific assessment document. National Guidelines and Standards Office, Environmental Quality Branch, Environment Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  17. Environment Canada (2005) Biological test method: test for measuring emergence and growth of terrestrial plants exposed to contaminants in soil. Report: EPS 1/RM/45—February 2005 (with June 2007 amendments). Method development and applications section, Environmental Technology Centre, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  18. Environment Canada, Health Canada (2010) Screening assessment for the challenge: vanadium oxide (vanadium pentoxide). Available at: http://www.ec.gc.ca/ese-ees/default.asp?lang=En&n=62A2DBA9. Accessed 15 Aug 2012
  19. Ernst WHO, Nelissen HJM (2000) Life-cycle phases of a zinc- and cadmium-resistant ecotype of Silene vulgaris in risk assessment of polymetallic mine soils. Environ Pollut 107:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fargašova A, Beinrohr E (1998) Metal–metal interactions in accumulation of V5+, Ni2+, Mo6+, Mn2+ and Cu2+ in under- and above-ground parts of Sinapis alba. Chemosphere 36:1305–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallagher SR, Leonard RT (1982) Effect of vanadate, molybdate, and azide on membrane-associated APTase and soluble phosphatase activities in corn roots. Plant Physiol 70:1335–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gil J, Alvarez CE, Martinez CM, Perez N (1995) Effect of vanadium on lettuce growth, cationic nutrition, and yield. J Environ Sci Health A 30:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamill AS, Marriage PB, Friesen G (1977) A method for assessing herbicide performance in small plots experiments. Weed Sci 25:386–389Google Scholar
  24. HydroQual Laboratories Ltd (1995) Toxicity testing of NCSRP priority substances for development of soil quality guidelines for contaminated sites. Environment Canada, HullGoogle Scholar
  25. Irwin RJ, VanMouwerik M, Stevens L, Seese MD, Basham W (1997) Environmental contaminants encyclopedia. National Parks Service, Water Resources Division, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalsch W, Junker T, Römbke J (2006) A chronic plant test for the assessment of contaminated soils. Part 1: method development. J Soils Sediments 6:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan DI, Adriano DC, Carlson CL, Sajwan KS (1990) Vanadium: toxicity and accumulation by beans. Water Air Soil Pollut 49:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khorfan S, Wahoud A, Reda Y (2001) Recovery of vanadium pentoxide from spent catalyst used in the manufacture of sulphuric acid. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Chem Eng 45:131–137Google Scholar
  29. Kohno Y (1986) Vanadium induced manganese toxicity in bush bean plants grown in solution culture. J Plant Nutr 9:1261–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee S-R, Wu C-Y (2002) Study of vanadium emission control in combustion systems by thermodynamic equilibrium analyses. Adv Environ Res 7:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin HW, Kaplan DI (1998) Temporal changes in cadmium, thallium, and vanadium mobility in soil and phytoavailability under field conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 101:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mejia JA, Rodriguez R, Armienta A, Mata E, Fiorucci A (2007) Aquifer vulnerability zoning: an indicator of atmospheric pollutants input? Vanadium in the Salamanca Aquifer, Mexico. Water Air Soil Pollut 185:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moskalyk RR, Alfantazi AM (2003) Processing of vanadium: a review. Miner Eng 16:793–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman MC, Ownby DR, Mezib LCA, Powell DC, Christensen TRL, Lerberg SB et al (2000) Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:508–515Google Scholar
  35. Norberg-King TJ (1993) A linear interpolation method for sublethal toxicity: The inhibition concentration (ICp) approach (version 2.0). Technical Report 03-93. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, DuluthGoogle Scholar
  36. Olness A, Palmquist D, Rinke J (2001a) Ionic ratios and crop performance. II: effects of interactions amongst vanadium, phosphorus, magnesium and calcium on soybean yield. J Agron Crop Sci 187:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olness A, Nelsen T, Rinke J, Voorhees WB (2001b) Ionic ratios and crop performance. I: vanadate and phosphate on soybean. J Agron Crop Sci 185:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olszyk D, Pfleeger T, Lee EH, Burdick C, King G, Plocher M et al (2008) Selecting and evaluating native plants for region-specific phytotoxicity testing. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ovari M, Csukas M, Zaray GY (2001) Speciation of beryllium, nickel, and vanadium in soil samples from Csepel Island, Hungary. Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:768–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Page-Dumroese D, Jurgensen Elliot MW, Rice T, Nesser J, Collins T, Meurisse R (2000) Soil quality standards and guidelines for forest sustainability in northwestern North America. Forest Ecol Manag 138:445–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Panichev N, Mandiwana K, Moema D, Molatlhegi R, Ngobeni P (2006) Distribution of vanadium(V) species between soil and plants in the vicinity of a vanadium mine. J Hazard Mater 137:649–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poledniok J, Buhl F (2003) Speciation of vanadium in soil. Talanta 59:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quist EE, Hokin LE (1978) The presence of two (Na+ + K+)-ATPase inhibitors in equine muscle ATP: vanadate and a dithioerythritol-dependent inhibitor. Biochim Biophys Acta 511:202–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rasmussen PE, Subramanian KS, Jessiman BJ (2001) A multi-element profile of house dust in relation to exterior dust and soils in the city of Ottawa, Canada. Sci Total Environ 267:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas P, Carpenter C, Boutin C, Allison J (2012) Cerium chloride (CeCl3): Effects on crops and selected native plant species. Report produced for the Inorganic Units, Ecological Assessment Division, Science and Technology BranchGoogle Scholar
  46. Ueoka S, Furukawa J, Nakanishi TM (2001a) Multi-elemental profile patterns during the life cycle stage of the soybean. Part 2. Determination of transition elements, V, Cr, Mn, Fe and Zn. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 249:475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ueoka S, Furukawa J, Nakanishi TM (2001b) Multi-elemental profile patterns during the life cycle stage of the soybean. Part 1. Determination of representative elements, Na, Mg, Al, K and Ca. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 249:469–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullah SM, MH Gerzabek (1991) Influence of fulvic and humic acids on Cu- and V-toxicity to Zea meys(L.). Aus dem Institut für Landwirtschaft des Österreichischen Forschungszentrums Seibersdorf Ges.m.b.H., Leiter: a.o. Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-lng. Dr. E. HaunoldGoogle Scholar
  49. Venkataraman BV, Sudha S (2005) Vanadium toxicity. Asian J Exp Sci 19(2):127–134Google Scholar
  50. Wang JF, Liu Z (1999) Effect of vanadium on the growth of soybean seedlings. Plant Soil 216:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White AL, Boutin C (2007) Herbicidal effects on non-target vegetation: investigating the limitations of current pesticide registration guidelines. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2634–2643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Health Organization (2000) Air quality guidelines: vanadium, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula G. Smith
    • 1
  • Céline Boutin
    • 2
  • Loren Knopper
    • 3
  1. 1.Stantec Consulting, LtdOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Environment CanadaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Intrinsik Environmental Sciences, IncMississaugaCanada

Personalised recommendations