Effects of Mining-Derived Metals on Riffle-Dwelling Crayfish in Southwestern Missouri and Southeastern Kansas, USA

  • Ann L. Allert
  • Robert J. DiStefano
  • Christopher J. Schmitt
  • James F. Fairchild
  • William G. Brumbaugh
Article

Abstract

Riffle-dwelling crayfish populations were sampled at 16 sites in 4 tributaries of the Spring River located within the Tri-State Mining District in southwest Missouri. Crayfish density, physical habitat quality, and water quality were examined at each site to assess the ecological effects of mining-derived metals on crayfish. Metals (lead, zinc, and cadmium) were analyzed in samples of surface water, sediment, detritus, and whole crayfish. Sites were classified a posteriori into reference, mining, and downstream sites primarily based on metal concentrations in the materials analyzed. Three species of crayfish (Orconectes neglectus neglectus, O. macrus, and O. virilis) were collected during the study; however, only O. n. neglectus was collected at all sites. Mean crayfish densities were significantly lower at mining sites than at reference sites. Mean concentrations of metals were significantly correlated among the materials analyzed and were significantly greater at mining and downstream sites than at reference sites. Principal component analyses showed a separation of sites due to an inverse relationship among crayfish density, metals concentrations, and physical habitat quality variables. Sediment probable-effects quotients and surface-water toxic unit scores were significantly correlated; both indicated risk of toxicity to aquatic biota at several sites. Metals concentrations in whole crayfish at several sites exceeded concentrations known to be toxic to carnivorous wildlife. Mining-derived metals have the potential to impair ecosystem function through decreased organic matter processing and nutrient cycling in streams due to decreased crayfish densities.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the private landowners who allowed us to access the studied streams. Personnel who assisted in the study included staff from the Missouri Department of Conservation and from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Columbia Environmental Research Center. We thank J. Besser, J. Hinck, N. Wang, and two anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments that greatly improved the quality of this manuscript. This study was jointly funded by the USGS, the United States Department of the Interior Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, the Missouri Department of Conservation, and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. This manuscript has been reviewed in accordance with USGS policy. All procedures performed conformed with USGS guidelines for the humane treatment of the test organisms during culture and experimentation. The use of trade names does not constitute USGS or United States Government endorsement.

Supplementary material

244_2012_9797_MOESM1_ESM.docx (233 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 232 kb)

References

  1. Allert AL, Wildhaber ML, Schmitt CJ, Chapman D, Callahan E (1997) Toxicity of sediments and pore-waters and their potential impact on Neosho madtom, Noturus placidus, in the Spring River system affected by historic zinc-lead mining and related activities in Jasper and Newton Counties, Missouri; and Cherokee County, Kansas. Final report to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service-Region 3, Columbia Missouri Ecological Services Field Office. United States Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Allert AL, Fairchild JF, DiStefano RJ, Schmitt CJ, Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG et al (2008) Effects of lead-zinc mining on crayfish (Orconectes hylas) in the Black River watershed, Missouri. Freshw Crayfish 16:97–111Google Scholar
  3. Allert AL, Fairchild JF, DiStefano RJ, Schmitt CJ, Brumbaugh WG, Besser JM (2009a) Ecological effects of lead mining on Ozark streams—in-situ toxicity to woodland crayfish (Orconectes hylas). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:1207–1219Google Scholar
  4. Allert AL, Fairchild JF, Schmitt CJ, Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, Olson SJ (2009b) Effects of mining-derived metals on riffle-dwelling benthic fishes in Southeast Missouri, USA. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72(6):1642–1651Google Scholar
  5. Allert AL, DiStefano RJ, Fairchild JF, Schmitt CJ, Brumbaugh WG (2010) Effects of mining-derived metals on riffle-dwelling crayfish and in-situ toxicity to juvenile Orconectes hylas and Orconectes luteus in the Big River of southeast Missouri, USA. United States Geological Survey Administrative report, submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  6. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Angelo RT, Cringan MS, Chamberlain DL, Stahl AJ, Haslouer SG, Goodrich CA (2007) Residual effects of lead and zinc mining on freshwater mussels in the Spring River Basin (Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma, USA). Sci Total Environ 384:467–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (1999) Aquatic habitat assessment—common methods. American Fisheries Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  9. Bain MA, Finn JT, Booke HE (1985) Quantifying stream substrate for habitat analysis studies. N Am J Fish Manag 5:499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barks JH (1977) Effects of abandoned lead and zinc mines and tailings piles on water quality in the Joplin area, Missouri. United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 77–75. United States Geological Survey, RollaGoogle Scholar
  11. Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, Brunson EL, Ingersoll CG (2005) Acute and chronic toxicity of lead in water and diet to the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(7):1807–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, May TW, Schmitt CJ (2007) Biomonitoring of lead, zinc, and cadmium in streams draining lead-mining and non-mining areas, southeast Missouri, USA. Environ Monit Assess 129:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, Allert AL, Poulton BC, Schmitt CJ, Ingersoll CG (2009a) Ecological impacts of lead mining on Ozark streams—toxicity of sediment and pore water. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, Hardesty DK, Hughes JP, Ingersoll CG (2009b) Assessment of metal-contaminated sediments from the Southeast Missouri (SEMO) mining district using sediment toxicity tests with amphipods and freshwater mussels. United States Geological Survey Administrative report submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Office, Region 3, Environmental Contaminants Division, Columbia Missouri. United States Geological Survey, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Brumbaugh WG, Schmitt CJ, May TW (2005) Concentrations of cadmium, lead, and zinc in fish from mining-influenced waters of northeastern Oklahoma—sampling of blood, carcass, and liver for aquatic biomonitoring. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brumbaugh WG, May TW, Besser JM, Allert AL, Schmitt CJ (2007) Assessment of elemental concentrations in streams of the New Lead Belt in southeastern Missouri, 2002–05. United States Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5057. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5057/. Accessed 14 May 2009
  17. Burkey JL, Simon TP (2010) Reach- and watershed-scale associations of crayfish within an area of varying agricultural impact in West-Central Indiana. Southeast Nat 9(sp3):199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 488Google Scholar
  19. Clark JM (2009) Abiotic and biotic factors affecting size-dependent crayfish (Orconectes obscures) distribution, density, and survival. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, KentGoogle Scholar
  20. Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–129Google Scholar
  21. Creed RP Jr (1994) Direct and indirect effects of crayfish grazing in a stream community. Ecology 75:2091–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Czarnezki JM (1985) Accumulation of lead in fish from Missouri streams impacted by lead mining. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34:736–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis JV, Schumacher JG (1992) Water quality characterization of the Spring River basin, southwestern Missouri and southeastern Kansas. United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 90–4176. United States Geological Survey, RollaGoogle Scholar
  24. Dillman CB, Wagner BK, Wood RM (2010) Phylogenetic estimation of species limits in dwarf crayfishes from the Ozarks, Orconectes macrus and Orconectes nana (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Southeast Nat 9(sp3):185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DiStefano RJ (2005) Trophic interactions between Missouri Ozarks stream crayfish communities and sport fish predators—increased abundance and size structure of predators cause little change in crayfish community densities. Project F-1-R-054, Study S-41, Job 4, Final report. Missouri Department of Conservation, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  26. DiStefano RJ, Decoske JJ, Vangilder TM, Barnes LS (2003) Macrohabitat partitioning among three crayfish species in two Missouri streams, USA. Crustaceana 76:343–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DiStefano RJ, Herleth-King SS, Imhoff EI (2008) Distribution of the imperiled Meek’s crayfish (Orconectes meeki meeki, Faxon) in the White River drainage of Missouri, USA—associations with multi-scale environmental variables. Freshw Crayfish 16:27–36Google Scholar
  28. Farag AM, Woodward DF, Brumbaugh WG, Goldstein JG, MacConnell E, Hogstrand C et al (1999) Dietary effects of metals-contaminated invertebrates from the Coeur d’Alene River, Idaho, on cutthroat trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:578–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flinders CA, Magoulick DD (2003) Effects of stream permanence on crayfish community structure. Am Midl Nat 149(1):134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flinders CA, Magoulick DD (2005) Distribution, habitat use, and life history of stream-dwelling crayfish in the Spring River drainage of Arkansas and Missouri with a focus on the Mammoth Spring crayfish (Orconectes marchandi). Am Midl Nat 154:358–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gore JA, Bryant RM Jr (1990) Temporal shifts in physical habitat of the crayfish, Orconectes neglectus (Faxon). Hydrobiologia 199:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill AM, Lodge DM (1995) Multi-trophic-level impact of sublethal interactions between bass and omnivorous crayfish. J N Am Benthol Soc 14:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbs HH Jr (1993) Trophic relationships of North American freshwater crayfishes and shrimps. Milwaukee Public Museum, MilwaukeeGoogle Scholar
  34. Ingersoll CG, MacDonald DD, Wang N, Crane JL, Field LJ, Haverland PS et al (2001) Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 41(1):8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knowlton MF, Boyle TP, Jones JR (1983) Uptake of lead from aquatic sediment by submersed macrophytes and crayfish. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12(5):535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lodge DM, Hill AM (1994) Factors governing species composition, population size, and productivity of cool-water crayfish. Nord J Freshw Res 69:111–136Google Scholar
  37. MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Crawford M, Prencipe H, Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG et al (2010) Advanced screening-level ecological risk assessment (SLERA) for aquatic habitats within the Tri-State Mining District, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri. Draft Final Technical Report submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Dallas, Texas, Region 7, Kansas City, Kansas, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  39. Magoulick DD, DiStefano RJ (2007) Invasive crayfish Orconectes neglectus threatens native crayfishes in the Spring River drainage of Arkansas and Missouri. Southeast Nat 6(1):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maret TR, MacCoy DE (2002) Fish assemblages and environmental variables associated with hardrock mining in the Coeur d’Alene river basin, Idaho. Trans Amer Fish Soc 131:865–884Google Scholar
  41. May TW, Wiedmeyer RH, Brumbaugh WG, Schmitt CJ (1997) The determination of metals in sediment pore waters and in 1 N HCl-extracted sediments by ICP-MS. At Spectrosc 18:133–139Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell DJ, Smock LA (1991) Distribution, life history and production of crayfish in the James River, Virginia. Am Midl Nat 126(2):353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Momot WT (1995) Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems. Rev Fish Sci 3:33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Momot WT, Gowing H, Jones PD (1978) The dynamics of crayfish and their role in ecosystems. Am Midl Nat 99(1):10–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pfleiger WL (1996) The crayfishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, JeffersonGoogle Scholar
  46. Rabalais MR, Magoulick DD (2006) Influence of an invasive crayfish species on diurnal habitat use and selection by a native crayfish species in an Ozark stream. Am Midl Nat 155:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rabeni CF (1985) Resource partitioning by stream-dwelling crayfish—the influence of body size. Am Midl Nat 113:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rabeni CF, Gossett M, McClendon DD (1995) Contribution of crayfish to benthic invertebrate production and trophic ecology of an Ozark stream. Freshw Crayfish 10:163–173Google Scholar
  49. Schmitt CJ, Wildhaber ML, Hunn JB, Nash T, Tieger MN, Steadman BL (1993) Biomonitoring of lead-contaminated Missouri streams with an assay for erythrocyte δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity in fish blood. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25:464–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmitt CJ, Brumbaugh WG, Linder GL, Hinck JE (2006) A screening-level assessment of lead, cadmium, and zinc in fish and crayfish from northeastern Oklahoma, USA. Environ Geochem Health 38:445–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmitt CJ, Brumbaugh WG, Besser JM, Hinck JE, Bowles DE, Morrison LW et al (2008) Protocol for monitoring metals in Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, Version 1.0. United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1269. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1269/. Accessed 14 May 2009
  52. Stein RA, Magnuson JJ (1976) Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57(4):751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stewart DR (1986) A brief description of the historical, ore production, mine pumping, and prospecting of the Tri-State Zinc-Lead District of Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma. In: Hagni RD (ed) Guidebook to the geology and environmental concerns in the Tri-States Lead-Zinc District, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma. Division of Geology and Land Survey-Department of Natural Resources, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, pp 16–29Google Scholar
  54. Strahler AN (1952) Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:305–923Google Scholar
  55. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1992) Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA-630-R-92-001. USEPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  56. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Wildlife exposure factors handbook. EPA-600-R-93-187. USEPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  57. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund—process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. EPA-540-R-97-006. USEPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  58. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Screening level ecological risk assessment protocol for hazardous waste combustion facilities. Peer draft review, v. 1. EPA-530-D-99-001A. USEPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  59. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Procedures for the derivation of equilibrium partitioning sediment benchmarks (ESBs) for the protection of benthic organisms: Metal mixtures (cadmium copper, lead nickel, silver, and zinc). EPA-600-R-Q2-011, USEPA, Office of Research and Development, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  60. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006) National recommended water quality criteria, updated 2009. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/wqctable/index.html. Accessed 15 May 2009
  61. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (2007) Ecological soil screening levels for nickel. Interim final OSWER directive 9285.7–76. http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecossl/pdf/eco-ssl_nickel.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2009
  62. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang N, Ingersoll CG, Ivey CD, Hardesty DK, May TW, Augspurger T et al (2010) Sensitivity of early life stages of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) to acute and chronic toxicity of lead, cadmium, and zinc in water. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2053–2063Google Scholar
  64. Westhoff JT, Guyot JA, DiStefano RJ (2006) Distribution of the imperiled Williams’ crayfish (Orconectes williamsi) in the White River drainage of Missouri—associations with multi-scale environmental variables. Am Midl Nat 156(2):273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wigginton AJ, Birge WJ (2007) Toxicity of cadmium to six species in two genera of crayfish and the effect of cadmium on molting success. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:548–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wildhaber ML, Schmitt CJ (1996) Estimating aquatic toxicity as determined through laboratory tests of Great Lakes sediments containing complex mixtures of environmental contaminants. Environ Monit Assess 41:255–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wildhaber ML, Schmitt CJ, Allert AL (1997) Elemental concentrations in benthic invertebrates from the Neosho, Cottonwood, and Spring rivers. Final report to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Manhattan, Kansas. United States Geological Survey, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  68. Wildhaber ML, Allert AL, Schmitt CJ, Tabor VM, Mulhern D, Powell KL et al (2000) Natural and anthropogenic influences on the distribution of the threatened Neosho madtom in a midwestern warmwater stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:243–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams AB (1952) Six new crayfishes of the genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Astacidae) from Arkansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. Trans Kans Acad Sci 55(3):330–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang Y, Richardson JS, Negishi JN (2004) Detritus processing, ecosystem engineering and benthic diversity—a test of predator-omnivore interference. J Anim Ecol 73:756–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann L. Allert
    • 1
  • Robert J. DiStefano
    • 2
  • Christopher J. Schmitt
    • 1
  • James F. Fairchild
    • 1
  • William G. Brumbaugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia Environmental Research Center, United States Geological SurveyColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Missouri Department of ConservationCentral Regional Office and Conservation Research CenterColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations