A Comparison of the Teratogenicity of Methylmercury and Selenomethionine Injected Into Bird Eggs

  • Gary H. Heinz
  • David J. Hoffman
  • Jon D. Klimstra
  • Katherine R. Stebbins
Article

Abstract

Methylmercury chloride and seleno-l-methionine were injected separately or in combinations into the fertile eggs of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), chickens (Gallus gallus), and double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus), and the incidence and types of teratogenic effects were recorded. For all three species, selenomethionine alone caused more deformities than did methylmercury alone. When mallard eggs were injected with the lowest dose of selenium (Se) alone (0.1 μg/g), 28 of 44 embryos and hatchlings were deformed, whereas when eggs were injected with the lowest dose of mercury (Hg) alone (0.2 μg/g), only 1 of 56 embryos or hatchlings was deformed. Mallard embryos seemed to be more sensitive to the teratogenic effects of Se than chicken embryos: 0 of 15 chicken embryos or hatchlings from eggs injected with 0.1 μg/g Se exhibited deformities. Sample sizes were small with double-crested cormorant eggs, but they also seemed to be less sensitive to the teratogenic effects of Se than mallard eggs. There were no obvious differences among species regarding Hg-induced deformities. Overall, few interactions were apparent between methylmercury and selenomethionine with respect to the types of deformities observed. However, the deformities spina bifida and craniorachischisis were observed only when Hg and Se were injected in combination. One paradoxical finding was that some doses of methylmercury seemed to counteract the negative effect selenomethionine had on hatching of eggs while at the same time enhancing the negative effect selenomethionine had on creating deformities. When either methylmercury or selenomethionine is injected into avian eggs, deformities start to occur at much lower concentrations than when the Hg or Se is deposited naturally in the egg by the mother.

References

  1. Albers PH, Koterba MT, Rossmann R, Link WA, French JB, Bennett RS et al (2007) Effects of methylmercury on reproduction in American kestrels. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1856–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Conaway CH, Black FJ, Grieb TM, Roy S, Flegal AR (2008) Mercury in the San Francisco Estuary. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 194:29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuvin-Aralar MLA, Furness RW (1991) Mercury and selenium interaction: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 21:348–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Yee J, Adelsbach TL (2009) Mercury demethylation in livers of four waterbird species: evidence for dose-response thresholds with liver total mercury. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Yates DE, Hanson W, Taylor KM et al (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fimreite N (1971) Effects of dietary methylmercury on ring-necked pheasants. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper 9, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  7. Fimreite N (1974) Mercury contamination of aquatic birds in Northwestern Ontario. J Wildl Manage 38:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finley MT, Stendell RC (1978) Survival and reproductive success of black ducks fed methyl mercury. Environ Pollut 16:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heinz GH (1979) Methylmercury: reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks. J Wildl Manage 43:394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ (1998) Methylmercury chloride and selenomethionine interactions on health and reproduction in mallards. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ (2003) Embryotoxic thresholds of mercury: estimates from individual mallard eggs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Gold LG (1989) Impaired reproduction of mallards fed an organic form of selenium. J Wildl Manage 53:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Kondrad SK, Erwin CA (2006) Factors affecting the toxicity of methylmercury injected into eggs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Klimstra JD, Stebbins KR, Kondrad SL, Erwin CA (2009) Species differences in sensitivity of avian embryos to methylmercury. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Klimstra JD, Stebbins KR, Kondrad SL (2011) Toxicity of methylmercury injected into eggs when dissolved in water versus corn oil. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:2103–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill EF, Henny CJ, Grove RA (2008) Mercury and drought along the lower Carson River, Nevada: II. Snowy egret and black-crowned night-heron reproduction on Lahontan Reservoir, 1997–2006. Ecotoxicology 17:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffman DJ, Heinz GH (1988) Embryotoxic and teratogenic effects of selenium in the diet of mallards. J Toxicol Environ Health 24:477–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman DJ, Moore JM (1979) Teratogenic effects of external egg applications of methyl mercury in the mallard, Anas platyrhynchos. Teratology 20:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffman DJ, Ohlendorf HM, Aldrich TW (1988) Selenium teratogenesis in natural populations of aquatic birds in central California. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 17:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klimstra JD, Yee JL, Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Stebbins KR (in press) Interactions between methylmercury and selenomethionine injected into mallard eggs. Environ Toxicol ChemGoogle Scholar
  21. Nishimura M, Urakawa N (1976) A transport mechanism of methyl mercury to egg albumen in laying Japanese quail. Jpn J Vet Sci 38:433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norheim G (1987) Levels and interactions of heavy metals in sea birds from Svalbard and the Antarctic. Environ Pollut 47:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ochoa-Solano A, Gitler C (1968) Incorporation of 75Se-selenomethionine and 35S-methionine into chicken egg white proteins. J Nutr 94:243–248Google Scholar
  24. Ohlendorf HM (1989) Bioaccumulation and effects of selenium in wildlife. In: Jacobs LW (ed) Selenium in agriculture and the environment. Special Publication No. 23. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 133–177Google Scholar
  25. Ohlendorf HM (2002) The birds of Kesterson reservoir: a historical perspective. Aquatic Toxicol 57:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohlendorf HM, Fleming WJ (1988) Birds and environmental contaminants in San Francisco and Chesapeake Bay. Mar Pollut Bull 19:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohlendorf HM, Hothem RL (1995) Agricultural drainwater effects on wildlife in central California. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA Jr, Cairns J Jr (eds) Handbook of ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 577–595Google Scholar
  28. Ohlendorf HM, Hoffman DJ, Saiki MK, Aldrich TW (1986a) Embryonic mortality and abnormalities of aquatic birds: apparent impacts of selenium from irrigation drainwater. Sci Total Environ 52:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohlendorf HM, Lowe RW, Kelly PR, Harvey TE (1986b) Selenium and heavy metals in San Francisco Bay diving ducks. J Wildl Manage 50:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Santolo GM, Yamamoto JT, Pisenti JM, Wilson BW (1999) Selenium accumulation and effects on reproduction in captive American kestrels fed selenomethionine. J Wildl Manage 63:502–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwarzbach SE, Albertson JD, Thomas CM (2006) Effects of predation, flooding, and contamination on reproductive success of California Clapper rails (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) in San Francisco Bay. Auk 123:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skorupa JP (1998) Selenium poisoning in fish and wildlife in nature: lessons from twelve real-world examples. In: Frankenberger WT Jr, Engberg RA (eds) Environmental Chemistry of Selenium. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 315–354Google Scholar
  33. Skorupa JP, Ohlendorf HM (1991) Contaminants in drainage water and avian risk thresholds. In: Dinar A, Zilberman D (eds) The economics and management of water and drainage in agriculture. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, pp 345–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith GJ, Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Spann JW, Krynitsky AJ (1988) Reproduction in black-crowned night-herons fed selenium. Lake Reservoir Manage 4:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stewart AR, Luoma SN, Schlekat CE, Doblin MA, Hieb KA (2004) Food web pathway determines how selenium affects aquatic ecosystems: San Francisco Bay case study. Environ Sci Technol 38:4519–4526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tejning S (1967) Biological effects of methyl mercury dicyandiamide-treated grain in the domestic fowl Gallus gallus L. Oikos (Suppl 8), 116 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiemeyer SJ, Hoffman DJ (1996) Reproduction in eastern screech-owls fed selenium. J Wildl Manage 60:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA)  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary H. Heinz
    • 1
  • David J. Hoffman
    • 1
  • Jon D. Klimstra
    • 1
  • Katherine R. Stebbins
    • 1
  1. 1.Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterUnited States Geological SurveyBeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations