Mass Loadings of Triclosan and Triclocarbon from Four Wastewater Treatment Plants to Three Rivers and Landfill in Savannah, Georgia, USA

  • Kurunthachalam Senthil KumarEmail author
  • S. Mahalakshmi Priya
  • Aaron M. Peck
  • Kenneth S. Sajwan


Triclosan (TCS) and triclocarbon (TCC) are bactericides used in various consumer and personal-care products. Recent studies have revealed considerable levels of these bactericides in wastewater, aquatic wildlife, and human samples. Consequently, in this study we measured TCS and TCC in influent and effluent, sludge, and pond water/sediment samples from four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and three major rivers in Savannah, Georgia (USA). Among these treatment plants, the Wilshire plant showed elevated concentrations of TCS (influent, 86,161; effluent, 5370 ng/L), whereas TCC was greater in the Georgetown plant (influent, 36,221) and the Wilshire plant effluent (3045 ng/L). Clearance of TCS and TCC were 95 and 92%, respectively, in the President Street plant, 94 and 85%, respectively, in the Wilshire plant, 99 and 80%, respectively, in the Travis Field plant, and 99 and 99%, respectively, in the Georgetown plant. Based on the mass flow estimate, 138 g/day of TCS and 214 g/day TCC are released into the Savannah River from the President Street, Travis Field, and Wilshire plants and 1.60 g/day TCS and 1.64 g/day TCC are released to the Ogeechee River from the Georgetown plant. Based on the sludge data, the loading estimate can be calculated that 32 and 0.004 g/day TCS and 53 and 0.01 g/day TCC (nonincinerated and incinerated, respectively) are deposited in landfill from the President Street plant alone, whereas 4.6, 26, and 6.8 g/day TCS and 3.8, 23, and 5.9 g/day TCC (wet sludge) were produced and dumped in landfill from the rest of the WWTPs. Incineration of wet sludge can eliminate 99.99% of TCS and TCC. Concentrations of TCS and TCC in water and sediment were greater in the Vernon River, followed by the Savannah River and the Ogeechee River.


Sludge Incineration Sludge Sample Triclosan Urban Stream 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors wish to thank the United States Department of Energy (USDOE) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for funding this research through grant No. DE-FG09-02SR22248. We would like to thank Mrs. Chandrakala Jenkins, Mr. Randell, staff, and workers of the President Street, Travis Field, Wilshire, and George Town plants for providing samples and technical details. We also thank Mrs. Whitney for the sampling in the President Street and Travis Field plants and assistance in wastewater filtration.


  1. Adolfsson-Erici M, Pettersson M, Parkkonen J, Sturve J (2002) Triclosan, a commonly used bactericide found in human milk and in the aquatic environment in Sweden. Chemosphere 46:1485–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allmyr M, Adolfsson-Erici M, McLachlan MS, Sandborgh-Englund G (2006a) Triclosan in plasma and milk from Swedish nursing mothers and their exposure via personal care products. Sci Total Environ 372:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allmyr M, McLachlan MS, Sandborgh-Englund G, Adolfsson-Erici M (2006b) Determination of triclosan as its pentafluorobenzoyl ester in human plasma and milk using electron capture negative ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 78:6542–6546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendz D, Paxeus NA, Ginn RT, Loge FJ (2005) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceutically active compounds in the environment, a case study. J Hazard Mater 122:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bester K (2003) Triclosan in a sewage treatment process-balances and monitoring data. Water Res 37:3891–3896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bester K (2005) Fate of triclosan, triclosan-methyl in sewage treatment plants and surface waters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd GR, Reemtsma H, Grimm DA, Mitra S (2003) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in surface and treated waters of Lousiana, USA and Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 311:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd GR, Palmeri JM, Zhang S, Grimm DA (2004) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine disruptng chemicals (EDCs) in stormwater canals and Bayou St. John in New Orleans, Lousiana, USA. Sci Total Environ 333:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL (2008) Exposure of the U.S. population to Bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect 116:303–308Google Scholar
  10. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM, Llompart M, Garcia-Jares C, Rodriguez I, Gomez M, Ternes T (2004) Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant. Water Res 38:2918–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciniglia C, Cascone C, Giudice RL, Pinto G, Pollio A (2005) Application of methods for assessing the geno- and cytotoxicity of Triclosan to C. ehrenbergii. J Hazard Mater 122:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dayan AD (2007) Risk assessment of triclosan [Irgasa] in human breast milk. Food Chem Toxicol 45:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLorenzo ME, Keller JM, Arthur CD, Finnegan MC, Harper HE, Winder VL, Zdankiewicz DL (2008) Toxicity of the antimicrobial compound triclosan and formation of the metabolite methyl-triclosan in estuarine systems. Environ Toxicol 23:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dussault EB, Balakrishnan VK, Sverko E, Solomon KR, Sibley PK (2008) Toxicity of human pharmaceuticals and personal care products to benthic invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EWG/EBMUD (2007) Environmental Working Group & East Bay Municipal Utility District, Down the drain: sources of hormone-disrupting chemicals in San Francisco Bay. Available from
  16. Foran CM, Bennett ER, Benson WH (2000) Developmental evaluation of a potential non-steroidal estrogen: triclosan. Marine Environ Res 50:153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gee RH, Charles A, Taylor N, Darbre PD (2008) Oestrogenic and androgenic activity of triclosan in breast cancer cells. J Appl Toxicol 28:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gómez MJ, Martínez Bueno MJ, Lacorte S, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A (2006) Pilot survey monitoring pharmaceuticals and related compounds in a sewage treatment plant located on the Mediterranean coast. Chemosphere 66:993–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halden RU, Paul DH (2004) Analysis of triclocarbon in aquatic samples by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 38:4849–4855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halden RU, Paul DH (2005) Co-occurrence of triclocarbon and triclosan in U.S. water resources. Environ Sci Technol 39:1420–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heidler J, Halden RU (2007) Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment. Chemosphere 66:362–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heidler J, Halden RU (2008) Meta-Analysis of mass balances examining chemical fate during wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 42:6324–6332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heidler J, Sapkota A, Halden RU (2006) Partitioning, persistence, and accumulation in digested sludge of the topical antiseptic triclocarban during wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 40:3634–3639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houde M, Wells R, Fair P, Bossart G, Hohn A, Rowles T, Sweeney J, Solomon K, Muir D (2005) Polyfluoroalkyl compounds in free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Technol 39:6591–6598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hua W, Bennett ER, Letcher RJ (2005) Triclosan in waste and surface waters from the upper Detroit River by liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. Environ Int 31:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ishibashi H, Matsumura N, Hirano M, Matsuoka M, Shiratsuchi H, Ishibashi Y, Takao Y, Arizono K (2004) Effects of triclosan on the early life stages and reproduction of medaka Oryzias latipes and induction of hepatic vitellogenin. Aquat Toxicol 67:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson RR, Navone R, Larson EL (1963) An unusual epidemic of methemoglobinemia. Pediatrics 31:222–225Google Scholar
  28. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindstrçm A, Buerge IJ, Poiger T, Bergqvist PA, Muller MD, Buser HR (2002) Occurrence and environmental behaviour of the bactericide triclosan and its methyl derivative in surface waters and in waste water. Environ Sci Toxicol 36:2322–2329Google Scholar
  30. Lishman L, Smyth SA, Sarafin K, Kleywegt S, Toito J, Peart T, Lee B, Servos M, Beland M, Seto P (2006) Occurrence and reductions of pharmaceuticals and personal care products and estrogens by municipal wastewater treatment plants in Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 367:544–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loganathan BG, Sajwan KS, Sinclair E, Senthil Kumar K, Kannan K (2007) Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and perfluorocarboxylates in two wastewater treatment facilities in Kentucky and Georgia. Water Res 41:4611–4620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lores M, Llompart M, Sanchez-Prado L, Garcia-Jares C, Cela R (2005) Confirmation of the formation of dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the photodegradation of triclosan by photo-SPME. Anal Bioanal Chem 381:1294–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsumura N, Ishibashi H, Hirano M, Nagao Y, Watanabe N, Shiratsuchi H (2005) Effects of nonylphenol and triclosan on production of plasma vitellogenin and testosterone in male South African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). Biol Pharma Bull 28:1748–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McAvoy D, Schatowitz B, Hauk MM, Edkhoff W (2002) Meaurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1323–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nolen GA, Dierckman TA (1979) Reproduction and teratogenic studies of a 2:1 mixture of 3, 4, 4¢-trichlorocarbanilide and 3-trifluoromethyl-4, 4¢-dichlorocarbanilide in rats and rabbits. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 51:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orvos DR, Versteeg DJ, Inauen J, Capdevielle M, Rothenstein A (2002) Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1338–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perencevich EN, Wong MT, Harris AD (2001) National and regional assessment of the antibacterial soap market: a step toward determining the impact of prevalent antibacterial soaps. Am J Infect Control 29:281–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ponte C, Richard J, Bonte C, Lequien P, Lacombe A (1974) Methemoglobinemia in newborns discussion of etiological role of trichlorocarbanilide. Sem Hopit 50:359–365Google Scholar
  39. Remberger M, Sternbeck J, Strömberg K (2002) Screening av triclosan och vissa bromerade fenoliska ämnen i Sverige. [Screening of triclosan and some brominated, phenolic compounds in Sweden]. IVL Rapp B1477-2Google Scholar
  40. Samsøe-Petersen L, Winther-Nielsen M, Madsen T (2003) Fate and effects of triclosan. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  41. Sapkota A, Heidler J, Halden RU (2007) Detection of triclocarbon and two co-contaminating chlorocarbanilides in US aquatic environments using isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 103:21–29Google Scholar
  42. See NA (1996) Review and evaluation of pharmacology and toxicology data division of dermatologic and dental drug products (HFD-540) Food and Drug Administration. As cited in EPA 2008bGoogle Scholar
  43. TCC Consortium (2002a) High production volume (HPV) chemical challenge program data availability and screening level assessment for triclocarbon, CAS#: 101-20-2. Report No. 201-14186A, pp 1–35. Available from
  44. TCC Consortium (2002b) IUCLID Data Set Report No. 201-14186B, pp. 1–44. Available from
  45. Thomas PM, Foster GD (2005) Tracking acidic pharmaceuticals, caffeine, and triclosan through the wastewater treatment process. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. USEPA (2000) Draft dioxin reassessment chapters released for scientific review and public comment Agency (1703), June 12, 2000Google Scholar
  47. Waltman EL, Venables BJ, Waller WT (2006) Triclosan in a north Texas wastewater treatment plant and the influent and effluent of an experimental constructed wetland. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolff MS, Teitelbaum SL, Windham G, Pinney SM, Britton JA, Chelimo C (2007) Pilot study of urinary biomarkers of phytoestrogens, phthalates, and phenols in girls. Environ Health Perspect 115:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ying GG, Kookana RS (2006) Triclosan in wastewaters and biosolids from Australian wastewater treatment plants. Environ Int 33:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurunthachalam Senthil Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Mahalakshmi Priya
    • 2
  • Aaron M. Peck
    • 3
  • Kenneth S. Sajwan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Sciences and MathematicsSavannah State UniversitySavannahUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyDr N.G.P. Arts and Science CollegeCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Skidaway Institute of OceanographySavannahUSA

Personalised recommendations