Concentrations of Metals in Blood and Feathers of Nestling Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays

  • B. A. RattnerEmail author
  • N. H. Golden
  • P. C. Toschik
  • P. C. McGowan
  • T. W. Custer


In 2000, 2001, and 2002, blood and feather samples were collected from 40–45-day-old nestling ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) from Chesapeake Bay and Delaware Bay and River. Concentrations of 18 metals, metalloids, and other elements were determined in these samples by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy, and Hg concentrations were measured by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy. When compared to concurrent reference areas (South, West, and Rhode Rivers), mean As and Hg concentrations in blood were greater (p < 0.05) in two of three Chesapeake Bay regions of concern (Baltimore Harbor [As: 1.18 vs. 0.548 μg/g dw], Anacostia River [Hg: 0.305 vs. 0.178 μg/g dw], and Elizabeth River [As: 0.876 vs. 0.663 μg/g dw; Hg: 0.260 vs. 0.180 μg/g dw]). Lead was detected more frequently in blood of nestlings from the highly industrialized Elizabeth River compared to the rural reference area. When compared to the concurrent reference area, mean Al, Ba, Hg, Mn, and Pb concentrations in feathers were substantially greater (p < 0.05) in one or more Chesapeake regions of concern (Anacostia River [Al: 206 vs. 62.1 μg/g dw; Ba: 3.31 vs. 0.823 μg/g dw; Mn: 65.4 vs. 22.9 μg/g dw] and Elizabeth River [Al: 165 vs. 63.5 μg/g dw; Hg: 1.24 vs. 0.599 μg/g dw; Pb 1.47 vs. 0.543 μg/g dw]). When compared to the coastal Inland Bays reference area, feathers of nestlings from northern Delaware Bay and River had greater concentrations (p < 0.05) of Ba (1.90 vs. 0.660 μg/g dw), Fe (258 vs. 109 μg/g dw), Mn (18.5 vs. 4.66 μg/g dw), Mo (0.130 vs. 0.040 μg/g dw), Pb (1.96 vs. 0.624 μg/g dw), and V (0.671 vs. 0.325 μg/g dw), presumably due to extensive metal-working and petroleum refinery activities. Concentrations of Hg in nestling feathers from Delaware were frequently greater than in the Chesapeake. The present findings and those of related reproductive studies suggest that concentrations of several heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Hg, Pb) in nestling blood and feathers from Chesapeake and Delaware Bays were below toxicity thresholds and do not seem to be affecting chick survival during the nestling period.


Reference Site Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Feather Sample Nestling Period Baltimore Harbor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Funding was provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Environmental Quality, and Delaware Coastal Programs. The authors thank E. Broderick, C. Koppie, R. Lukei, Jr., J. Miller, R. Scarborough, and D. Stotts for assistance with field collections; the U.S. Coast Guard for granting access to navigational aids; John F. Moore and Peter M. Gross for quality assurance of the chemical analyses; and David J. Hoffman for reviewing a draft of the manuscript.


  1. Agusa T, Matsumoto T, Ikemoto T, Anan Y, Kubota R, Yasunaga G, Kunito T, Tanabe S, Ogi H, Shibata Y (2005) Body distribution of trace elements in blacked-tailed gulls from Rishiri Island, Japan: age-dependent accumulation and transfer to feathers and eggs. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2107–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burger J (1993) Metals in avian feathers: bioindicators of environmental pollution. Rev Environ Toxicol 5:203–311Google Scholar
  3. Cahill TM, Anderson DW, Elbert RA, Perley BP, Johnson DR (1998) Elemental profiles in feather samples from a mercury-contaminated lake in central California. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd ed. Plymouth Marine Laboratories, Plymouth, UK, p 172Google Scholar
  5. DesGranges J-L, Rodrigue J, Tardif B, Laperle M (1998) Mercury accumulation and biomagnification in ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the James Bay and Hudson Bay regions of Quebec. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DRBC (Delaware River Basin Commission) (2001) Fish and shellfish tissue data. Available at
  7. Eisler R (2003) Mercury. In: Handbook of chemical risk assessment: health hazards to humans, plants, and animals. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, vol 1, chap 5, pp 313–409Google Scholar
  8. Evers DC, Kaplan JD, Meyers MW, Reaman PS, Braselton WE, Major A, Burgess N, Scheuhammer AM (1998) Geographic trend in mercury measured in common loon feathers and blood. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furness RW (1993) Birds as monitors of pollutants. In: Furness RW, Greenwood JJD (eds) Birds as monitors of environmental change, Chapt. 3. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 86–143Google Scholar
  10. Golden NH, Rattner BA (2003) Ranking terrestrial vertebrate species for utility in biomonitoring and vulnerability to environmental contaminants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 176:67–136Google Scholar
  11. Golden NH, Rattner BA, Cohen JB, Hoffman DJ, Russek-Cohen E, Ottinger MA (2003a) Lead accumulation in feathers of nestling black-crowned night herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) experimentally treated in the field. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1517–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golden NH, Rattner BA, McGowan PC, Parsons KC, Ottinger MA (2003b) Concentrations of metals in feathers and blood of nestling black-crowned night-herons (Nyticorax nycticorax) in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 70:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall LW Jr, Anderson RD, Alden RW III (2002) A ten year summary of concurrent ambient water column and sediment toxicity tests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: 1990–1999. Environ Monit Assess 76:311–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henny CJ, Blus LJ, Hoffman DJ, Grove RA, Hatfield JS (1991) Lead accumulation and osprey production near a mining site on the Coeur d’Alene River, Idaho. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henny CJ, Kaiser JL, Grove RA, Bentley VR, Elliott JE (2003) Biomagnification factors (fish to osprey eggs from Willamette River, Oregon, U.S.A.) for PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs and OC pesticides. Environ Monit Assess 84:275–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hess GK, West RL, Barnhill MV III, Fleming LM (2000) Birds of Delaware. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, p 656Google Scholar
  17. Hughes KD, Ewins PJ, Clark KE (1997) A comparison of mercury levels in feathers and eggs of osprey (Pandion haliaetus) in the North American Great Lakes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 33:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MDE (Maryland Department of the Environment) (2001) Risk based screening of metals in Maryland Finfish tissue 1985–1997. Available at
  20. McGee BL, Fisher DJ, Yonkos LT, Ziegler GP, Turley S (1999) Assessment of sediment contamination, acute toxicity, and population viability of the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Baltimore Harbor, Maryland, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2151–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Odsjo T, Roos A, Johnels AG (2004) The tail feathers of osprey nestlings (Pandion haliaetus) as indicators of change in mercury load in the environment of southern Sweden (1969-1998): A case study with a note on the simultaneous intake of selenium. Ambio 33:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rattner BA, McGowan PC, Golden NH, Hatfield JS, Toschik PC, Lukei RF Jr, Hale RC, Schmitz-Afonso I, Rice CP (2004) Contaminant exposure and reproductive success of ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) nesting in Chesapeake Bay regions of concern. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:126–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sepulveda MS, Frederick PC, Spalding MG, Williams GE Jr (1999) Mercury contamination in free-ranging great egret nestlings (Adrea albus) from southern Florida, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:985–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sutton CC, O’Herron JC II, Zappalorti RT (1996) The scientific characterization of the Delaware Estuary. DRBC Project No. 321, HA File No. 93.21, The Delaware Estuary ProgramGoogle Scholar
  25. Toschik PC, Rattner BA, McGowan PC, Christman MC, Carter DB, Hale RC, Matson CW, Ottinger MA (2005) Effects of contaminant exposure on reproductive success of ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) nesting in Delaware River and Bay, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:617–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toschik PC, Christman MC, Rattner BA, Ottinger MA (2006) Evaluation of osprey habitat suitability and interaction with contaminant exposure. J Wildl Manage 70:977–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) Test methods for evaluating solid wastes–physical/chemical methods: Method 6020, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. USEPA Office of Solid Waste #SW-846. U.S. EPA. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. VADEQ (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality) (2001) Fish tissue analysis for metals 2001. Available at
  29. Watts BD, Byrd MA, Watts MU (2004) Status and distribution of breeding ospreys in the Chesapeake Bay: 1995–96. J Raptor Res 38:47–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. A. Rattner
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. H. Golden
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. C. Toschik
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. C. McGowan
    • 3
  • T. W. Custer
    • 4
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterBeltsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Marine-Estuarine-Environmental Science ProgramUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceChesapeake Bay Field OfficeAnnapolisUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Geological SurveyUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences CenterLa CrosseUSA

Personalised recommendations