Time- and Dose-Dependent Effects of Roundup on Human Embryonic and Placental Cells

  • N. Benachour
  • H. Sipahutar
  • S. Moslemi
  • C. Gasnier
  • C. Travert
  • G. E. SéraliniEmail author


Roundup® is the major herbicide used worldwide, in particular on genetically modified plants that have been designed to tolerate it. We have tested the toxicity and endocrine disruption potential of Roundup (Bioforce®) on human embryonic 293 and placental-derived JEG3 cells, but also on normal human placenta and equine testis. The cell lines have proven to be suitable to estimate hormonal activity and toxicity of pollutants. The median lethal dose (LD50) of Roundup with embryonic cells is 0.3% within 1 h in serum-free medium, and it decreases to reach 0.06% (containing among other compounds 1.27 mM glyphosate) after 72 h in the presence of serum. In these conditions, the embryonic cells appear to be 2–4 times more sensitive than the placental ones. In all instances, Roundup (generally used in agriculture at 1–2%, i.e., with 21–42 mM glyphosate) is more efficient than its active ingredient, glyphosate, suggesting a synergistic effect provoked by the adjuvants present in Roundup. We demonstrated that serum-free cultures, even on a short-term basis (1 h), reveal the xenobiotic impacts that are visible 1–2 days later in serum. We also document at lower non-overtly toxic doses, from 0.01% (with 210 μM glyphosate) in 24 h, that Roundup is an aromatase disruptor. The direct inhibition is temperature-dependent and is confirmed in different tissues and species (cell lines from placenta or embryonic kidney, equine testicular, or human fresh placental extracts). Furthermore, glyphosate acts directly as a partial inactivator on microsomal aromatase, independently of its acidity, and in a dose-dependent manner. The cytotoxic, and potentially endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup are thus amplified with time. Taken together, these data suggest that Roundup exposure may affect human reproduction and fetal development in case of contamination. Chemical mixtures in formulations appear to be underestimated regarding their toxic or hormonal impact.


Glyphosate Roundup Aromatase Activity Endocrine Disruption JEG3 Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was accomplished in the Biochemistry Laboratory EA2608 and the other authors’ affiliations represent their present postal address. For financial support and fellowships, we thank La Fondation Denis Guichard and The Human Earth Foundation, CRIIGEN (Committee for Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering), and le Conseil Regional de Basse-Normandie. The authors declare they have no competing financial interest.


  1. Acquavella JF, Bruce H, Alexander BH, Mandel JS, Gustin C, Baker B, Champan P, Bleeke M (2004) Glyphosate biomonitoring for farmers and their families: results from the farm family exposure study. Environ Health Perspect 112:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auvray P, Sourdaine P, Séralini GE (1998) PAAn-1b and PAAn-E: two phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotides inhibit human aromatase gene expression. Bioch Bioph Res Com 253:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beuret CJ, Zirulnik F, Gimenez MS (2005) Effect of the herbicide glyphosate on liver lipoperoxidation in pregnant rats and their fetuses. Reprod Toxicol 19:501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brian JV, Harris CA, Scholze M, Backhaus T, Booy P, Lamoree M, et al. (2005) Accurate prediction of the response of freshwater fish to a mixture of estrogenic chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 113:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulun SE, Sebastian S, Takayama K, Suzuki T, Sasano H, Shozu M (2003) The human CYP19 (aromatase P450) gene: update on physiologic roles and genomic organization of promoters. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 86:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carreau S (2001) Germ cells: a new source of estrogens in the male gonad. Mol Cell Endocrinol 178:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox C (1998) Glyphosate (Roundup). J Pest Reform 18:3–17Google Scholar
  9. Cox C (2004) Glyphosate. J Pest Reform 24:10–15Google Scholar
  10. Daruich J, Zirulnik F, Gimenez MS (2001) Effect of the herbicide glyphosate on enzymatic activity in pregnant rats and their fetuses. Environ Res 85:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dintinger T, Gaillard JL, Moslemi S, Zwain I, Silberzhan P (1989) Androgen and 19-norandrogen aromatization by equine and human placental microsomes. J Steroid Biochem 33:949–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiraungkoorskul W, Upatham ES, Kruatrachue M, Sahaphong S, Vichasri-Grams S, Pokethitiyook P (2003) Biochemical and histopathological effects of glyphosate herbicide on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Environ Toxicol 18:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, van der Saag PT, van der Burg B, Gustafsson JA (1998) Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor ß. Endocrinology 139:4252–4263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. L’Azou B, Fernandez P, Bareille R, Beneteau M, Bourget C, Cambar J, Bordenave L (2005) In vitro endothelial cell susceptibility to xenobiotics: comparison of three cell types. Cell Biol Toxicol 21:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemazurier E, Sourdaine P, Nativelle C, Plainfosse B, Séralini GE (2001) Aromatase gene expression in the stallion. Mol Cell Endocrinol 178:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Letcher RJ, van Holsteijn I, Drenth HJ, Norstrom RJ, Bergman A, Safe S, Pieters R, van den Berg M (1999) Cytotoxicity and aromatase (CYP19) activity modulation by organochlorines in human placental JEG-3 and JAR choriocarcinoma cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 160:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lydy M, Belden J, Wheelock C, Hammock B, Denton D (2004) Challenges in regulating pesticide mixtures. Ecol Society 9:1–15Google Scholar
  18. Marc J, Mulner-Lorillon O, Boulben S, Bureau D, Durand G, Bella R (2002) Pesticide Roundup provokes cell division dysfunction at the level of CDK1/cyclin B activation. Chem Res Toxicol 15:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marc J, Bellé R, Morales J, Cormier P, Mulner-Lorillon O (2004) Formulated glyphosate activates the DNA-response checkpoint of the cell cycle leading to the prevention of G2/M transition. Toxicol Sci 82:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marc J, Le Breton M, Cormier P, Morales J, Belle R, Mulner-Lorillon O (2005) A glyphosate-based pesticide impinges on transcription. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 203:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monosson E (2005) Chemical mixtures: considering the evolution of toxicology and chemical assessment. Environ Health Perspect 113:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monroy CM, Cortes AC, Sicard DM, de Restrepo HG (2005) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of human cells exposed in vitro to glyphosate. Biomedica 25:335–345Google Scholar
  23. Moslemi S, Séralini GE (1997) Inhibition and inactivation of equine aromatase by steroidal and non-steroidal compounds. A comparison with human aromatase inhibition. J Enzyme Inhib 12:241–254Google Scholar
  24. Moslemi S, Vibet A, Papadopoulos V, Camoin L, Gaillard JL (1997) Purification and characterization of equine testicular cytochrome P-450 aromatase: comparison with the human enzyme. Comp Biochem Physiol 118:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mossmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and Cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson DR (1998) Cytochrome P450 nomenclature. Methods Mol Biol 107:15–24Google Scholar
  27. Nosanchuk JD, Ovalle R, Casadevall A (2001) Glyphosate inhibits melanization of Cryptococcus neoformans and prolongs survival of mice after systemic infection. J Infect Dis 183:1093–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peluso M, Munnia A, Bolognesi C, Parodi S (1998) 32P-postlabeling detection of DNA adducts in mice treated with the herbicide Roundup. Environ Mol Mutagen 31:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pettersson M, Ekelund NG (2006) Effects of the Herbicides Roundup and Avans on Euglena gracilis. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richard S, Moslemi S, Sipahutar H, Benachour N, Séralini GE (2005) Differential effects of glyphosate and Roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environ Health Perspect 13:716–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savitz DA, Arbuckle T, Kaczor D, Curtis KM (1997) Male pesticide exposure and pregnancy outcome. Am J Epidemiol 146:1025–1036Google Scholar
  32. Seibert H, Mörchel S, Gülden M (2002) Factors influencing nominal effective concentrations of chemical compounds in vitro: medium protein concentration. Toxicol In Vitro 16:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Séralini GE, Moslemi S (2001) Aromatase inhibitors: past, present and future. Mol Cell Endocrinol 178:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takahashi M, Horie M, Aoba N (2001) Analysis of glyphosate and its metabolite, aminomethylphosphonic acid, in agricultural products by HPLC. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi 42:304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson EA, Siiteri PK (1974) Utilization of oxygen and reduces nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate by human placental microsomes during aromatization of androstenedione. J Biol Chem 249:5364–5372Google Scholar
  36. Tichy M, Borek-Dohalsky V, Rucki M, Reitmajer J, Feltl L (2002) Risk assessment of mixtures: possibility of prediction of interaction between chemicals. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75(Suppl):S133–S136Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (ECSTAC) Final Report, August 1998. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Vibet A, Dintinger T, Maboundou JC, Gaillard JL, Divoux D, Silberzahn P (1990) Estrogen synthetase in the horse: comparison of equine placental and rat liver NADPH-cytochrome C(P-450) reductase activities. FEBS Lett 261:3l–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vollenhofer S, Burg K, Schmidt J, Kroath H (1999) Genetically modified organisms in food-screeening and specific detection by polymerase chain reaction. J Agric Food Chem 47:5038–5043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walsh LP, McCormick C, Martin C, Stocco DM (2000) Roundup inhibits steroidogenesis by disrupting steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein expression. Environ Health Perspect 1 08:769–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams GM, Kroes R, Munro IC (2000) Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for human. Regul Toxicol Pharmaco 131:117–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yousef MI, Salem MH, Ibrahim HZ, Helmi S, Seehy MA, Bertheussen K (1995) Toxic effects of carbofuran and glyphosate on semen characteristics in rabbits. J Environ Sci Health B30:513–534Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Benachour
    • 1
  • H. Sipahutar
    • 2
  • S. Moslemi
    • 3
  • C. Gasnier
    • 1
  • C. Travert
    • 1
  • G. E. Séralini
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratoire Estrogénes et Reproduction, USC-INRA, IBFA, Université de CaenCaenFrance
  2. 2.Department of BiologyState University of MedanMedanIndonesia
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Biochimie du Tissu Conjonctif, EA3214, CHU Côte de NacreCaenFrance
  4. 4.Laboratoire de Biochimie, EA2608-USC INRA, IBFA, Université de CaenCaenFrance

Personalised recommendations