Environmental Toxicity Studies Using Chickens as Surrogates for Wildlife: Effects of Injection Day



Domestic chicken embryos are frequently used for avian developmental toxicity studies of polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons, which are often injected into eggs with oil-based vehicles. Injection times range from immediately prior to incubation (embryonic day zero, E0) to after 4 days of incubation (E4) and beyond. Because the majority of organogenesis in chicken embryos occurs during the first 4 days of development, injection after E0 may miss critical, sensitive, developmental periods. We evaluated whether differences in the day of vehicle administration would lead to differences in standard measures of embryotoxicity. We assessed embryotoxicity using mortality, organ somatic indices, teratogenesis, and behavior in hatchling chickens developmentally exposed to a high volume (1.0 μl/g egg) of corn oil vehicle, which was injected into the airsac at E0 or E4. The E0 vehicle group had 76.5% higher overall embryo mortality, embryos died earlier in development, and hatchlings took more than two times longer to right in a righting reflex test compared to the E4 vehicle group. Other behavioral results demonstrated that hatchling chickens from the E0 vehicle group performed differently from their respective no-inject controls, whereas hatchling chickens from the E4 vehicle group did not. The bursal somatic index differed statistically by injection day and weighed 23.7% more in the E0 vehicle group than the E4 vehicle group. These results suggest that the embryonic day of contaminant injection is an important consideration, particularly when using a high volume of vehicle to evaluate developmental toxicity of a contaminant on embryo mortality or behavior.


  1. Ameenuddin, S, Sunde, ML 1984Sensitivity of chick embryo to various solvents used in egg injection studiesExp Biol Med175176178Google Scholar
  2. Brunström, B 1990Mono-ortho-chlorinated chlorobiphenyls toxicity and induction of 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) activity in chick embryosArch Toxicol64188192Google Scholar
  3. Brunström, B, Andersson, L 1988Toxicity and 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase-inducing potency of coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in chick embryosArch Toxicol62263266Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, RW, Duby, RT 1973Embryotoxic effects of three PCB’s in the chickenBull Environ Contam Toxicol9261266Google Scholar
  5. Cowan, PJ 1973Parental calls and the approach behavior and distress vocalization of young domestic chickenCan J Zool51961967Google Scholar
  6. DeWitt, JC, Meyer, EB, Henshel, DS 2005Environmental toxicity Studies using chickens as Surrogates for wildlife: effects of vehicle volumeArch Environ Contam Toxicol48260269Google Scholar
  7. Engwall, M, Brunström, B, Jakobsson, E 1994Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH)-inducing potency and lethality of chlorinated naphthalenes in chicken (Gallus domesticus) and eider duck (Somateria mollissima) embryosArch Toxicol683742Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, BM, Vince, MA 1974Development of the avian embryo: A behavioral and physiological studyChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gustafsson, E, Brunström, B, Nilsson, U 1994Lethality and EROD-inducing potency of chlorinated chrysene in chick embryosChemosphere2923012308Google Scholar
  10. Hashizume, R, Atsushi, N, Masaya, I, Yamamoto, Y, Masui, S, Oka, M, Nakamura, T 1992Studies on teratological testing using chicken embryos—effects of solvents, injection sites and the age of the embryoExp Anim41349356Google Scholar
  11. Hatano, Y, Hatano, A 1994Influence of tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on the growth of chick embryosJ Toxicol Environ Health42357364Google Scholar
  12. Hoffman, DJ, Melancon, MJ, Klein, PN, Eisemann, JD, Spann, JW 1998Comparative developmental toxicity of planar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in chickens, American kestrels, and common ternsEnviron Toxicol Chem17747757Google Scholar
  13. Janz, DM, Bellward, GD 1996In ovo 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin exposure in three avian species. 1. Effects on thyroid hormones and growth during the perinatal periodToxicol Appl Pharmacol139281291Google Scholar
  14. Jin, X, Kennedy, SW, Di Muccio, T, Moon, TW 2001Role of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl-induced toxicity and species-differential sensitivity in chicken and duck embryosToxicol Appl Pharmacol172241248Google Scholar
  15. Jones, RB 1993Reduction of the domestic chick’s fear of human beings by regular handling and related treatmentsAnim Behav46991998Google Scholar
  16. Jones, RB, Waddington, D 1992Modification of fear in domestic chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, via regular handling and early environmental enrichmentAnim Behav4310211033Google Scholar
  17. Masteller, EL, Pharr, GT, Funk, FE, Thompson, CB 1997Avian B cell developmentInt Rev Immunol15185206Google Scholar
  18. Newby-Schmidt, MB, Norton, S 1981Detection of subtle effects on the locomotor ability of the chickenNeurotoxicol Teratol34548Google Scholar
  19. Nikolaidis, E, Brunström, B, Dencker, L 1988Effects of the TCDD congeners 3,3′,4,4′-tetrachlorbiphenyl and 3,3′,4,4′-tetrachloroazoxybenene on lymphoid development in the bursa of Fabricius of the chick embryoPharmacol Toxicol92315323Google Scholar
  20. Patten, BM 1971Early embryology of the chick5McGraw-Hill Book CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Prada, C, Puga, J, Perez-Mendez, L, Lopez, R, Ramirez, G 1991Spatial and temporal patterns of neurogenesis in the chick retinaEur J Neurosci3559569Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, LJ 1995The development of brain and behaviour in the chickenCAB InternationalWallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Romanoff, A 1960The avian embryoThe Macmillan CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Romanoff, A, Romanoff, A 1972Pathogenesis of the avian embryoJohn Wiley and Sons Inc.New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanderson, CA, Rogers, LJ 19812,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid causes behavioral effects in chickens at environmentally relevant dosesScience211593595Google Scholar
  26. Sanderson, JT, Bellward, GD 1995Hepatic microsomal ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase-inducing potency in ovo and cytosolic Ah receptor binding affinity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: comparison of four avian speciesToxicol Appl Pharmacol132131145Google Scholar
  27. Scanes, CG, Hart, LE, Decuypere, E, Kuhn, ER 1987Endocrinology of the avian embryo: an overviewJ Exp Zool Suppl1253264Google Scholar
  28. Schrankel, KR, Kreamer, BL, Hsia, MTS 1982Embryotoxicity of 3,3′,4,4′-tetrachloroazobenze and 3,3′4,4′-tetrachloroazoxybenzene in the chick embryoArch Environ Contam Toxicol11195202Google Scholar
  29. Sirkka, U, Pohjanvirta, R, Nieminen, SA, Tuomisto, J, Ylitalo, P 1992Acute neurobehavioral effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in Han/Wistar ratsPharmacol Toxicol71284288Google Scholar
  30. Spreen, O, Tupper, D, Risser, A, Tuokko, H, Edgell, D 1984Human developmental neuropsychologyOxford University Press, Inc.New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilson, HA 1993Neurobehavioral methods used in neurotoxicological researchToxicol Lett68231240Google Scholar
  32. Turro, I, Porter, RH, Picard, M 1994Olfactory cues mediate food selection by young chicksPhysiol Behav55761767Google Scholar
  33. Wehler, EK, Brunström, B, Rannug, U, Bergman, A 19903,3′,4,4′-tetrachlorobiphenyl: metabolism by the chick embryo in ovo and toxicity of hydroxylated metabolitesChem Biol Interactions73121132Google Scholar
  34. Weill, IC, Reynaud, CA 1987The B cell compartmentScience23810941098Google Scholar
  35. Weiss, B, Cory-Slechta, DA 1994

    Assessment of behavioral toxicity

    Hayes, AW eds. Principles and methods of toxicology3Raven Press LtdNew York10911155
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamie C DeWitt
    • 1
  • Erin B Meyer
    • 2
  • Diane S Henshel
    • 3
  1. 1. Curriculum in ToxicologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  2. 2. ICF ConsultingFairfaxUSA
  3. 3. School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations