Monitoring of Antifouling Booster Biocides in Water and Sedimentfrom the Port of Osaka, Japan

  • Hiroya Harino
  • Yoshiaki Mori
  • Yoshitaka Yamaguchi
  • Kiyoshi Shibata
  • Tetsuya Senda
Article

Abstract

Concentrations of booster antifouling compounds in the port of Osaka, Japan were assessed. Concentrations of Sea-Nine 211 (4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-3-isothiazolone), thiabendazole (2-(4-thiazolyl)-benzimidazole), IPBC (3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate), Diuron (3,4-dichlorophenyl-N, N-dimethylurea), Irgarol 1051 (2-methylthio-4-t-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine), and M1 (2-methylthio-4-t-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) in port water samples were in the range of <0.003–0.004 μg L−1, <0.0008–0.020 μg L−1, <0.0007–1.54 μg L−1, <0.0008–0.267 μg L−1, and <0.0019–0.167 μg L–1, respectively. IPBC was not detected in the water samples, but the concentration of Diuron was higher than any previously reported. The concentrations of Sea-Nine 211, thiabendazole, Diuron, Irgarol 1051, and M1 in sediment samples were in the range of <0.04–2.4 μg kg−1 dry, <0.08–1.2 μg kg−1 dry, <0.64–1350 μg kg−1 dry, <0.08–8.2 μg kg−1 dry, and <0.18–2.9 μg kg−1 dry, respectively. IPBC was again not detected. The levels of Sea-Nine 211, Diuron, and Irgarol 1051 in water and sediment samples were high in a poorly flushed mooring area for small and medium-hull vessels. Levels of Diuron and Irgarol 1051 were highest in summer. The concentration of Sea-Nine 211 in water increased between August and October 2002. Except for M1, increases in the levels of booster biocides in sediment were observed during the study period. The sediment–water partition (Kd) was calculated by dividing the concentrations in sediment by the concentrations in water. The Kd values for Sea-Nine 211, thiabendazole, Diuron, Irgarol 1051, and M1 were 690, 180, 2700, 300, and 870. The Kd value for these alternative compounds was lower than for TBT.

References

  1. Albanis, TA, Lambropoulou, DA, Sakkas, VA, Konstantinou, IK 2002Antifouling paint booster biocide contamination in Greek marine sedimentChemosphere48475485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alizieu, C, Saujuan, J, Deltriel, JP, Borel, M 1986Tin contamination in Arcachon Bay: effects of oyster shell anomaliesMar Pollut Bull17494498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biselli, S, Bester, K, Hühnerfuss, H, Fent, K 2000Concentrations of the antifouling compound Irgarol 1051 and of organotins in water and sediments of German North and Baltic Sea marinasMar Pollut Bull40233243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, JC, Readman, JW, Zhou, JL 2003Seasonal variability in the concentrations of Irgarol 1051 in Brighton Marina, UK; including the impact of dredgingMar Pollut Bull46444451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boxall, ABA, Comber, SD, Conrad, AU, Howcroft, J, Zaman, N 2000Inputs, monitoring and fate modelling of antifouling biocides in UK estuariesMar Pollut Bull40898905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chau, YK, Maguire, RJ, Brown, M, Yang, F, Batchelor, SP, Thompson, JA 1997Occurrence of butyltin compounds in mussels in CanadaAppl Organomet Chem11903912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comber, SDW, Gardner, MJ, Boxall, ABA 2002Survey of four marine antifoulant constituents (copper, zinc, diuron and Irgarol 1051) in two UK estuariesJ Environ Monit4417425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Connelly, DP, Readman, JW, Knap, AH, Davies, J 2001Contamination of the coastal waters of Bermuda by organotins and the Triazine herbicide Irgarol 1051Mar Pollut Bull42409414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahl, B, Blanck, H 1996Toxic effects of the antifouling agent Irgarol 1051 on periphyton communities in coastal water microcosmsMar Pollut Bull32342350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fent, K, Hunn, J 1991Phenyltins in water, sediment and biota of freshwater marinasEnviron Sci Technol25956963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardinali, PR, Plasencia, M, Mack, S, Popell, C 2002Occurrence of Irgarol 1051 in coastal waters from Biscayne Bay, Florida, USAMar Pollut Bull44781788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbs, PE, Bryan, GW 1986Reproductive failure in populations of the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus, caused by imposex induced by tributyltin from antifouling paintsJ Mar Biol Assoc UK66767777Google Scholar
  13. Hall, LW,Jr, Killlen, WD, Gardinali, PR 2004Occurrence of Irgarol 1051 and its major metabolite in Maryland waters of Chesapeake BayMar Pollut Bull48554562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harino, H, Fukushima, M, Yamamoto, Y, Kawai, S, Miyazaki, N 1998Organotin compounds in water, sediment, and biological samples from the Port of Osaka, JapanArch Environ Contam Toxicol35558564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobsen A, Mazza LS, Lawrence LJ, Lawrence B, Jackson S, Kesterson A (1993) Fate of an antifoulant in an aquatic environment. In: Racke KD, Leslie AR (eds) American Chemical Society (ACS) symposium series no. 522 Pesticides in urban environments: fate and significance. pp 127-138.Google Scholar
  16. Martinez, K, Ferrer, I, Barceló, D 2000Part-per-trillion level determination of antifouling pesticides and their byproducts in seawater samples by off-line solid-phase extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometryJ Chromatogr A8792737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez, K, Ferrer, I, Fernandez-Alba, AR, Marce, RM, Borrull, F, Barceló, D 2001Occurrence of antifouling biocides in the Spanish Mediterranean marine environmentEnviron Toxicol22543552Google Scholar
  18. Nebeker, AV, Schuytema, GS 1998Chronic effects of the herbicide diuron on freshwater cladocerans, amphipods, midges, minnows, worms and snailsArch Environ Contam Toxicol35441446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Okamura, H, Aoyama, I, Liu, D, Maguire, RJ, Pacepavicius, GJ, Lau, YL 2000aFate and ecotoxicity of the new antifouling compound Irgarol 1051 in the aquatic environmentWat Res3435233530Google Scholar
  20. Okamura, H, Aoyama, I, Takami, T, Maruyama, T, Suzuki, Y, Matsumoto, M, Katsuyama, I, Hamada, J, Beppu, T, Tanaka, O, Maguire, RJ, Liu, D, Lau, YL, Pacepavicius, GJ 2000bPhytotoxicity of the new antifouling compound irgarol 1051 and a major degradation productMar Pollut Bull40754763Google Scholar
  21. Okamura, H 2002Photodegradation of the antifouling compounds Irgarol 1051 and Diuron released from a commercial antifouling paintChemosphere484350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sakkas, VA, Konstantinou, IK, Lambropoulou, DA, Albanis, TA 2002Survey for the occurrence of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment of GreeceEnviron Sci Pollut Res9327332Google Scholar
  23. Scarlett, A, Donkin, ME, Fileman, TW, Donkin, P 1997Occurrence of the marine antifouling agent Irgarol 1051 within the Plymouth Sound locality: implications for the green macroalga Enteromorpha intestinalisMar Pollut Bull34645651Google Scholar
  24. Shade, WD, Hurt, SS, Jacobson, AH, Reinert, KH 1994Ecological risk assessment of a novel marine antifoulantEnviron Toxicol Risk Asses1216381408Google Scholar
  25. Thomas, KV, Sylvia, JB, Waldock, MJ 2000Antifouling paint booster biocide contamination in UK marine sedimentsMar Pollut Bull40739745Google Scholar
  26. Thomas, KV, Fileman, TW, Readman, JW, Waldock, MJ 2001Antifouling paint booster biocides in the UK coastal environment and potential risks of biological effectsMar Pollut Bull42677688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas, KV, McHugh, M, Waldock, MJ 2002Antifouling paint booster biocides in UK coastal waters: input, occurrence and environmental fateSci Total Environ293117127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tolosa, I, Readman, JW, Blaevoet, A, Ghilini, S, Bartocci, J, Horvat, M 1996Contamination of Mediterranean (Cote d’Azur) coastal waters by organotins and Irgarol 1051 used in antifouling paintsMar Pollut Bull32335341Google Scholar
  29. Tóth, S, Becker-van Slooten, K, Spack, L, Alencastro, LF, Tarradellas, J 1996Irgarol 1051, an antifouling compound in freshwater, sediment, and biota of Lake GenevaBull Environ Contam Toxicol57426433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Voulvoulis, N, Scrimshaw, MD, Lester, JN 2000Occurrence of four biocides utilized in antifouling paints, as alternatives to organotin compounds, in waters and sediments of a commercial estuary in the UKMar Pollut Bull40938946Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroya Harino
    • 1
  • Yoshiaki Mori
    • 1
  • Yoshitaka Yamaguchi
    • 2
  • Kiyoshi Shibata
    • 2
  • Tetsuya Senda
    • 2
  1. 1.Osaka City Institute of Public Health and Environmental SciencesTennoji-kuJapan
  2. 2.National Maritime Research InstituteMitakaJapan

Personalised recommendations