, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 137–148 | Cite as

Electron probe micro-analysis reveals the complexity of mineral deposition mechanisms in urinary stones

  • Muhammed A. P. Manzoor
  • M. Mujeeburahiman
  • Punchappady-Devasya RekhaEmail author
Original Paper


Urinary stones are complex mineralogical formations in the urinary system often impairing the kidney function. Several studies have attempted to understand the mechanisms of stone formation and growth; however, it remains to be fully explored. Here, we present a detailed investigation on the morphological and mineralogical characterizations of urinary stones. Structural properties of different types of urinary stones were done by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) analyses. X-ray maps of major and the trace elements were obtained using electron microprobe (EPMA) technique. Basic metabolic panel and urinary parameters of the patients were used for comparing mineral compositions among stone types. The study included five major types of stones identified based on the FTIR spectra. FTIR and XRD helped in identifying the major components of these stones. FE-SEM images revealed distinct microstructure and morphology of the stones among the stone types. EPMA analysis showed the presence of many metals other than calcium and certain non-metals within the urinary stone matrix at measurable levels, sometimes with distinct distribution patterns. The study demonstrates the characteristic micro-structure, morphology, distribution, and composition of elements in different stone types. Findings of the study provide scope for understanding the complex mechanisms involved in the urolithogenesis and association of trace elements in it.


Urolithiasis Electron probe micro-analysis FTIR FE-SEM XRD Mixed stone 



This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical clearance approval number YUEC.022/16.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Mandel NS, Mandel IC, Kolbach-Mandel AM (2017). Accurate stone analysis: the impact on disease diagnosis and treatment. Urolithiasis 45:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandel I, Mandel N (2007) Structure and compositional analysis of kidney stones. In: Urinary stone disease. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bazin D, Leroy C, Tielens F, Bonhomme C, Bonhomme-Coury L, Damay F et al (2016) Hyperoxaluria is related to whewellite and hypercalciuria to weddellite: what happens when crystalline conversion occurs? C R Chim 19(11):1492–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodgers AL (2017) Physicochemical mechanisms of stone formation. Urolithiasis 45(1):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evan AP (2010) Physiopathology and etiology of stone formation in the kidney and the urinary tract. Pediatr Nephrol 25:831–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ratkalkar VN, Kleinman JG (2011) Mechanisms of stone formation. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 9:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams JC, Worcester E, Lingeman JE (2017) What can the microstructure of stones tell us? Urolithiasis 45:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giannossi ML, Summa V, Mongelli G (2013) Trace element investigations in urinary stones: a preliminary pilot case in Basilicata (Southern Italy). J Trace Elem Med Biol 27:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpentier X, Bazin D, Combes C, Mazouyes A, Rouzière S, Albouy PA et al (2011) High Zn content of Randall’s plaque: a µ-X-ray fluorescence investigation. J Trace Elem Med Biol 25:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daudon M, Bazin D, André G, Jungers P, Cousson A, Chevallier P et al (2009) Examination of whewellite kidney stones by scanning electron microscopy and powder neutron diffraction techniques. J Appl Crystallogr 42(1):109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan SR, Hackett RL (1986) Identification of urinary stone and sediment crystals by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. J Urol 135(4):818–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan SR (1997) Calcium phosphate/calcium oxalate crystal association in urinary stones: implications for heterogeneous nucleation of calcium oxalate. J Urol 157:376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evan AP, Worcester EM, Coe FL, Williams J Jr, Lingeman JE (2015) Mechanisms of human kidney stone formation. Urolithiasis 43:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manzoor MA, Mujeeburahiman M, Rekha PD (2017) Association of serum biochemical panel with mineralogical composition of kidney stone in India. Acta Med Int 4:26‑30Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giannossi ML (2015) The optimal choice for stone analysis. J Xray Sci Technol 23(3):401–407Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bazin D, Daudon M, Combes C, Rey C (2012) Characterization and some physicochemical aspects of pathological microcalcifications. Chem Rev 112(10):5092–5120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gulley-Stahl HJ, Haas JA, Schmidt KA, Evan AP, Sommer AJ (2009) Attenuated total internal reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy: a quantitative approach for kidney stone analysis. Appl Spectrosc 63:759–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uvarov V, Popov I, Shapur N, Abdin T, Gofrit ON, Pode D et al (2011) X-ray diffraction and SEM study of kidney stones in Israel: quantitative analysis, crystallite size determination, and statistical characterization. Environ Geochem Health 33:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sekkoum K, Cheriti A, Taleb S, Belboukhari N (2016) FTIR spectroscopic study of human urinary stones from El Bayadh district (Algeria). Arab J Chem 9(3):330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Asyana V, Haryanto F, Fitri LA, Ridwan T, Anwary F, Soekersi H (2016) Analysis of urinary stone based on a spectrum absorption FTIR-ATR. J Phys Conf Ser 694:1; 012051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scherer K, Braig E, Willer K, Willner M, Fingerle AA, Chabior M et al (2015) Non-invasive differentiation of kidney stone types using X-ray dark-field radiography. Sci Rep 5:9527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Sommer AJ, Kim SC, Hatt EK, Lingeman JE et al (2004) Nondestructive analysis of urinary calculi using micro computed tomography. BMC Urol 4(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Daudon M, Jungers P, Bazin D (2008) Peculiar morphology of stones in primary hyperoxaluria. N Engl J Med 359(1):100–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williamson BJ, McLean J, Purvis OW (1998) Application of X-ray element mapping across the lichen-rock interface. ‎J Microsc 191:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramaswamy K, Killilea DW, Kapahi P, Kahn AJ, Chi T, Stoller ML (2015) The elementome of calcium-based urinary stones and its role in urolithiasis. Nat Rev Urol 12:543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kato Y, Yamaguchi S, Yachiku S, Nakazono S, Hori JI, Wada N et al (2004) Changes in urinary parameters after oral administration of potassium–sodium citrate and magnesium oxide to prevent urolithiasis. Urology 63(1):7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fujii E, Ohkubo M, Tsuru K, Hayakawa S, Osaka A, Kawabata K et al (2006) Selective protein adsorption property and characterization of nano-crystalline zinc-containing hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater 2:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu LN, Genge BR, Wuthier RE (2009) Differential effects of zinc and magnesium ions on mineralization activity of phosphatidylserine calcium phosphate complexes. J Inorg Biochem 103:948–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turgut M, Unal I, Berber A, Demir TA, Mutlu F, Aydar Y (2008) The concentration of Zn, Mg and Mn in calcium oxalate monohydrate stones appears to interfere with their fragility in ESWL therapy. Urol Res 36:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, Parks JH, Bledsoe SB, Shao Y et al (2003) Randall’s plaque of patients with nephrolithiasis begins in basement membranes of thin loops of Henle. J Clin Invest 111:607–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Frincu MC, Fogarty CE, Swift JA (2004) Epitaxial relationships between uric acid crystals and mineral surfaces: a factor in urinary stone formation. Langmuir 20:6524–6529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mandel N (1994) Crystal-membrane interaction in kidney stone disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:S37Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rimer JD, Kolbach-Mandel AM, Ward MD, Wesson JA (2017) The role of macromolecules in the formation of kidney stones. Urolithiasis 45:57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moreira DM, Friedlander JI, Carons A, Hartman C, Leavitt DA, Smith AD et al (2015) Association of serum biochemical metabolic panel with stone composition. Int J Urol 22:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Craven BL, Passman C, Assimos DG (2008) Hypercalcemic states associated with nephrolithiasis. Rev Urol 10:218Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Parmar MS (2004) Kidney stones. BMJ 328(7453):1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nerli R, Jali M, Guntaka AK, Patne P, Patil S, Hiremath MB (2015) Type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal stones. Adv Biomed Res 4:180Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammed A. P. Manzoor
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Mujeeburahiman
    • 2
  • Punchappady-Devasya Rekha
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Yenepoya Research CentreYenepoya UniversityMangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Yenepoya Medical CollegeYenepoya UniversityMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations