Advertisement

Urolithiasis

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 397–404 | Cite as

Histological changes caused by the prolonged placement of ureteral access sheaths: an experimental study in porcine model

  • Mehmet Özsoy
  • Iason Kyriazis
  • Theofanis Vrettos
  • Dimitrios Kotsiris
  • Panteleeimon Ntasiotis
  • Christian Seitz
  • Liatsikos Evangelos
  • Kallidonis Panagiotis
Original Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

The objective is to evaluate the histological damage to the ureteral wall caused by the prolonged placement of an access sheath in porcine model. Six ureters from three female pigs were randomized into three groups. In each group, an UAS with different indwelling time was inserted. 9.5/11.5 Fr Flexor® ureteral access sheaths were inserted in both ureters with left indwelling for 30 min and right for 60 min. The ureteral access sheath was advanced up to the proximal ureter. No resistance was observed during the insertion. Ureters were harvested in immediately after the sheath placement process in one pig. The ureters of the remaining two pigs were removed at 1 and 2 weeks after the procedure, respectively. Histological examination took place also in these specimens. Ureters with an indwelling time of 30 min: histological examination of the ureter after immediate dissection revealed signs of acute inflammation at the distal ureter. The ureter dissected at 1 week showed minimal focal transmural inflammation along its length with minimal epithelial hyperplasia. The ureter dissected at 2 weeks, no signs of inflammation. Ureters with an indwelling time of 60 min: histological examination of the immediately dissected ureter revealed signs of acute inflammation at the distal ureter. At 1 week, chronic transmural inflammation was predominantly observed in the distal ureter. At 2 weeks, minimal transmural inflammation was observed. The use of UAS did not cause any severe histological damage on porcine ureters. Acute signs of inflammation gradually recovered within 2 weeks.

Keywords

Access sheath Ureteroscopy Porcine Ureteral damage RIRS 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahams HM, Stoller ML (2004) The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths. Urol Clin N Am 31:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Qahtani SM, Letendre J, Thomas A, Natalin R, Saussez T, Traxer O (2014) Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your flexible ureteroscope? J Endourol Endourol Soc 28:286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delvecchio FC, Auge BK, Brizuela RM, Weizer AZ, Silverstein AD, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2003) Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology 61:518–522 (discussion 522) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emre Sener T, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Buttice S, Doizi S, Traxer O (2016) Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol Endourol Soc 30:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaplan AG, Lipkin ME, Scales CD, Jr., Preminger GM (2016) Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy. Nat Rev Urol 13(3):135–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lallas CD, Auge BK, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz R, Madden JF, Preminger GM (2002) Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol Endourol Soc 16:583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakada SY, Soble JJ, Gardner SM, Wolf JS Jr, Figenshau RS, Pearle MS, Humphrey PA, Clayman RV (1996) Comparison of acucise endopyelotomy and endoballoon rupture for management of secondary proximal ureteral stricture in the porcine model. J Endourol Endourol Soc 10:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedro RN, Weiland D, Reardon S, Monga M (2007) Ureteral access sheath insertion forces: implications for design and training. Urol Res 35:107–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E, Ather H, Bach C, Bach T, Denstedt JD, Fritsche HM, Grasso M, Hakenberg OW, Herwig R, Knoll T, Kuehhas FE, Liatsikos E, Liske P, Marberger M, Osther PJ, Santos JM, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, Traxer O, Trinchieri A, Turney B, Miernik A (2014) The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol 32:1033–1040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S (2007) Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol Endourol Soc 21:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189:580–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, Rassweiler J, Meretyk S, Tefekli A, Coz F, de la Rosette JJ (2015) Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol 33:2137–2144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Özsoy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Iason Kyriazis
    • 2
  • Theofanis Vrettos
    • 3
  • Dimitrios Kotsiris
    • 2
  • Panteleeimon Ntasiotis
    • 2
  • Christian Seitz
    • 1
  • Liatsikos Evangelos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kallidonis Panagiotis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of UrologyUniversity of Patras Medical SchoolPatrasGreece
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology and ICUUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations