Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intravenous paracetamol vs ibuprofen in renal colic: a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pain management is one of the essentials of emergency care. Renal colic secondary to urinary stone disease forms one of the most intense pain types. The present study aimed to compare the effect of intravenous ibuprofen to paracetamol in ceasing renal colic. This randomised double-blind study was composed of two intervention arms, intravenous paracetamol and intravenous ibuprofen. Study subjects were randomised to receive a single dose of either paracetamol, 1 g in 100 ml normal saline, or ibuprofen (800 mg in 100 ml normal saline) in a blinded fashion. Subjects reported pain intensity on a visual analogue scale with lines intersection multiples of ten just before the drug administration, 15 and 30 min after the study drug administration. Two hundred patients were randomised to either of two study arms: however, 97 patients in ibuprofen group and 99 patients in paracetamol groups were included into 30 minute analysis. Differences of pain improvements between two groups was 9.5 (5.4–13.7) at 15 min (p = 0.000) and 17.1 (11.9–22.5) at 30 min, those both favouring ibuprofen over paracetamol (p = 0.000). Although ten (10.1%) patients in paracetamol group needed rescue drug, there were only two (2%) patients in ibuprofen group (difference: 8%; 95% CI 0.7–16%, p = 0.02). Intravenous 800 mg ibuprofen is more effective than IV paracetamol in ceasing renal colic at 30 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turkcuer I, Serinken M, Karcioglu O, Zencir M, Keysan MK (2010) Hospital cost analysis of management of patients with renal colic in the emergency department. Urol Res 38(1):29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gülen B, Oktay C, Akpinar G, Sönmez E (2016) The utility of a standardized evaluation form for complaints in patients with acute abdominal and flank pain. Eurasian J Emerg Med 15:20–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Serinken M, Eken C, Erdemir F, Eliçabuk H, Başer A (2016) The reliability of national videos related to the kidney stones on YouTube. Turk J Urol 42(1):7–11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Serinken M, Eken C, Turkcuer I, Elicabuk H, Uyanik E, Schultz CH (2012) Intravenous paracetamol versus morphine for renal colic in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial. Emerg Med J 29(11):902–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bektas F, Eken C, Karadeniz O, Goksu E, Cubuk M, Cete Y (2009) Intravenous paracetamol or morphine for the treatment of renal colic: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 54(4):568–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pathan SA, Mitra B, Straney LD, Afzal MS, Anjum S, Shukla D, Morley K, Hilli SA, Rumaihi KA, Thomas SH, Cameron PA (2016) Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Southworth SR, Woodward EJ, Peng A, Rock AD (2015) An integrated safety analysis of intravenous ibuprofen [Caldolor(®)] in adults. J Pain Res 8:753–765

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergese SD, Candiotti K, Ayad SS, Soghomonyan S, Gan TJ (2015) The shortened infusion time of intravenous ibuprofen part 1: a multicenter, open-label, surveillance trial to evaluate safety and efficacy. Clin Ther 37(2):360–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gan TJ, Candiotti K, Turan A et al (2015) The shortened infusion time of intravenous ibuprofen, part 2: a multicenter, open-label, surgical surveillance trial to evaluate safety. Clin Ther 37(2):368–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Southworth S, Peters J, Rock A, Pavliv L (2009) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous ibuprofen 400 and 800 mg every 6 h in the management of postoperative pain. Clin Ther 31(9):1922–1935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kroll PB, Meadows L, Rock A, Pavliv L (2011) A multicenter, random-ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous ibuprofen (iv-ibuprofen) in the management of postoperative pain following abdominal hysterectomy. Pain Pract 11(1):23–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaye AD, Baluch A, Scott JT (2010) Pain management in the elderly population: a review. Ochsner J 10(3):179–187

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Serinken M, Eken C, Gungor F, Emet M, Al B (2016) Comparison of intravenous morphine vs paracetamol in sciatica: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. doi:10.1111/acem.12956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turkcuer I, Serinken M, Eken C, Yilmaz A, Akdag Ö, Uyan E, Kiray C, Elicabuk H (2014) Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: a randomised clinical trial. Emerg Med J 31(3):182–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eken C, Serinken M, Elicabuk H, Uyanik E, Erdal M (2014) Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen versus morphine in acute mechanical low back pain in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial. Emerg Med J 31(3):177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Golembiewski J, Mueller M (2011) Intravenous acetaminophen. J Perianesth Nurs 26(2):116–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Serinken.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study received no industrial funding. The expenditure of the drugs was covered by the Pamukkale University.

Conflict of interest

There are no competing interests. M. Serinken, declares that he has no conflict of interest. C. Eken, declares that he has no conflict of interest. E. Uyanık, declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cenker, E., Serinken, M. & Uyanık, E. Intravenous paracetamol vs ibuprofen in renal colic: a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Urolithiasis 46, 369–373 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0997-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0997-7

Keywords

Navigation