Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly
- 408 Downloads
The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) for the treatment of renal and/or proximal ureteral stones sized 1–2 cm in the elderly (≥60 years). Between January 2010 and March 2015, 184 consecutive mPNL and fURS were performed to treat intermediate renal and/or proximal ureteral stones in geriatric patients. The records were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes were compared. Although no significant difference was found in the complication rate between two groups, a statistical trend (p = 0.059) in favor of fURS was observed. In addition, multivariate analysis demonstrated that mPNL, preoperative positive urine culture and lower hemoglobin were independent risk factors for postoperative complication (p = 0.016, p = 0.021, p = 0.001, respectively). And fURS was significantly associated with less hemoglobin drop, red blood cell transfusion, analgesics requirement, postoperative hospital duration, and charges of laboratory tests, medical examinations and medications (p = 0.019, p = 0.037, p = 0.006, p = 0.000 and p = 0.007, p = 0.000, p = 0.000, p = 0.001, respectively), while higher costs of operations (p = 0.008). Receiver operating characteristic curve suggested a preoperative hemoglobin of 106.5 g/L as the threshold for predicting red blood cell transfusion after mPNL. The overall one-session stone-free rate of fURS at 1 month was lower (p = 0.006), while it was similar for solitary stone between two groups. Comorbidity and previous stone surgery did not affect postoperative complication and stone-free rate. This study shows that mPNL is more effective for multiple stones, but fURS is associated with potentially less complications and postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, preoperative hemoglobin level and urine culture can be used to predict postoperative complication risk and they may be helpful in choosing treatment methods for the elderly.
KeywordsMinimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy Flexible ureteroscopy Retrograde intrarenal surgery Elderly Calculi
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital (IRB ID: 20150404).
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81270787).
- 6.Arampatzis S, Lindner G, Irmak F, Funk GC, Zimmermann H, Exadaktylos AK (2012) Geriatric urolithiasis in the emergency department: risk factors for hospitalisation and emergency management patterns of acute urolithiasis. BMC Nephrol 13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-117 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Seitz C (2015) EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. http://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/. Accessed 15 Apr 2015
- 13.Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf JS Jr, Grabe M, Gravas S, Group CPS (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Organization WH Definition of an older or elderly person (2015) Health statistics and health information systems. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/. Accessed 15 Apr 2015
- 18.Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, Holzle L, Schilling D, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol 31(6):1555–1561. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0962-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(1):125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Akman T, Binbay M, Ugurlu M, Kaba M, Akcay M, Yazici O, Ozgor F, Muslumanoglu AY (2012) Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. J Endourol 26(6):625–629. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0526 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41(3):241–246. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, Armagan A, Gurbuz C, Caskurlu T, Saglam R (2012) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology 80(3):519–523. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Zhang Y, Yu CF, Jin SH, Zhu H, Na YQ (2014) A prospective comparative study between minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position and flexible ureteroscopy in the management of single large stone in the proximal ureter. Urology 83(5):999–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar