Solifenacin improves double-J stent-related symptoms in both genders following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy
- 570 Downloads
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of solifenacin on double-J stent-related symptoms following uncomplicated ureterosocpic lithotripsy (URSL). A total of 70 patients who underwent double-J ureteral stent insertion following URSL were consecutively recruited and received solifenacin postoperatively. Another 70 age- and sex-matched subjects without solifenacin therapy were enrolled as a control group. The clinical data including stone and stent characteristics were collected. All subjects completed the brief-form Ureteral Symptom Score Questionnaire (Chinese-version) to assess the lower urinary tract symptoms, stent-related body pain and hematuria 2 weeks after operation. The severity of stent-related symptoms was compared between two groups. The mean age was 53.8 in solifenacin group and 53.4 years in the control group (p = 0.87). The stone characteristics, stent size, position and curl completeness were similar in both groups. Compared to the control group, solifenacin group had significantly lower total symptom score, urgency and urge incontinence scores. As for stent-related body pain, solifenacin group had significantly less flank, abdominal, urethral pain and hematuria scores (all p < 0.05). The solifenacin versus control group showed significant benefits in lower urinary tract symptoms, stent-related pain and hematuria in both genders (all p < 0.05). Four subjects encountered minor adverse events (5.7 %) and one had urinary retention (1.4 %) in solifenacin group. For patients undergoing URSL and double-J stent indwelling, postoperative solifenacin use was effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, stent-related body pain and hematuria irrespective of genders.
KeywordsSolifenacin Ureteral stent Lower urinary tract symptoms
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (e.g., employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending).
- 9.Vardy MD, Mitcheson HD, Samuels TA, Wegenke JD, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S, Marshall TS, He W (2009) Effects of solifenacin on overactive bladder symptoms, symptom bother and other patient-reported outcomes: results from VIBRANT—a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract 63:1702–1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Chapple CR, Martinez-Garcia R, Selvaggi L, Toozs-Hobson P, Warnack W, Drogendijk T, Wright DM, Bolodeoku J (2005) A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin succinate and extended release tolterodine at treating overactive bladder syndrome: results of the STAR trial. Eur Urol 48:464–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar