Prevalence of urolithiasis in the autonomous city of Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 96 Downloads
Urolithiasis is the third most common pathological disease afflicting the urinary tract, and usually occurs between the third and fourth decades of an individual’s life. Epidemiological studies about this condition are lacking in our country. In 1998, we performed an epidemiological, cross-sectional study of the prevalence of urolithiasis in a sample of 1,086 subjects, which included men and women of all ages, selected from the general population of the city of Buenos Aires. The method used to gather basic information was an auto administered questionnaire about the present or past history of urolithiasis that was handled at the dwelling by a trained volunteer. We found a 3.96% lifetime prevalence of urolithiasis in the general population of Buenos Aires. The rate was slightly higher in men (4.35%) than in women (3.62%), with a male to female ratio of 1.19:1. No case of urolithiasis was found in subjects under the age of 20. In subjects over 19 years, the prevalence rate of the disease was 5.14%; 5.98% for men (CI 3.41–8.55%) and 4.49% for women (CI 2.61–6.37%). Prevalence increased with age, ranging from 2.75% in the 20–39 age group to 7.79% in those ≥60 years. The life time prevalence rate of urolithiasis observed in Buenos Aires is similar to that reported in a few other studies performed among males and females in the general population of USA and Europe. Prevalence of urolithiasis increases with age both in men and in women.
KeywordsUrolithiasis Life time prevalence General population
This work was partially supported by Casasco Laboratories, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- 6.Ljunhall S, Hedstrand H (1975) Epidemiology of renal stones in a middle-aged male population. Acta Med Scan 197:439Google Scholar
- 7.Andersen DA (1972) Environmental factors in the etiology of urolithiasis. In: Cifuentes DL, Rapado A, Hodgkinson A (eds) Urinary calculi. Karger, Basel, p 130Google Scholar
- 8.Pyrah LN (1979) Epidemiology of urolithiasis, in renal calculus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 3Google Scholar
- 13.Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC) (1991) Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
- 14.Dos Ramos Farías E, Pinduli I, Man Z, Spivacow R, Toblli J, Vidal S, Licciardi L (1996) Consejo de Litiasis Renal (ANCBA). Sondeo de Prevalencia de la litiasis renal en la región metropolitana, República Argentina, 1995. Anales X Congreso Argentino de Nefrología, San Carlos de Bariloche, p 28Google Scholar
- 15.Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York, p 14Google Scholar
- 16.del Valle E, Spivacow R, Zanchetta JR (1999) Metabolic abnormalities in 2,612 patients with nephrolithiasis. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 59:417–422Google Scholar
- 18.Robertson WG, Peacock M, Baker M, Marshal DH, Pearlman B, Speed R, Sergeant V, Spith A (1984) Epidemiological studies on the prevalence of urinary stone disease in Leeds. In: Ryall RL et al (eds) Urinary stone. Churchill and Livingston, Melbourne, p 6Google Scholar