Urological Research

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 227–231 | Cite as

Studies on the influence of DNA repair on radiosensitivity in prostate cell lines

  • Antonio M. Serafin
  • John M. Akudugu
  • Lothar Böhm
Original Paper

Abstract

The relationship between radiosensitivity and DNA repair was investigated in six human prostate cell lines, 1542-NPTX, BPH-1, 1542-CP3TX, 1532-CP2TX, 1535-CP1TX and LNCaP. Except for LNCaP, these cell lines are new and were derived from primary prostate tumours and normal non-tumourigenic prostate tissue. Cell survival was assessed by clonogenic assay. DNA damage was determined in non-synchronised cells by constant-field gel electrophoresis, and expressed as the fraction of DNA released. For initial damage, cells were embedded in agarose and irradiated on ice with 0–100 Gy 60Co γ-irradiation. Residual DNA damage was measured after 2 h and 20 h of repair. Radiosensitivity, given as the mean inactivation dose, was found to vary between 1.62 and 2.77 Gy. We found that radiosensitivity significantly correlates with the 2 h DNA repair component, giving a correlation coefficient of 0.92 (P=0.009). In the cell lines examined here the 2 h repair component emerges as an indicator of radiosensitivity.

Keywords

DNA damage repair Radiosensitivity Prostate cell lines 

References

  1. 1.
    Akudugu JM, Slabbert JP, Serafin A, Bohm L (2000) Frequency of radiation-induced micronuclei in neuronal cells does not correlate with clonogenic survival. Radiat Res 153: 62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arrand JE, Michael BD (1992) Recent advances in the study of ionizing radiation damage and repair. Int J Radiat Biol 61: 717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayne CW, Ross M, Donnelly F, Chapman K, Buck C, Bollina P, Habib FK (1998) Selective interactions between prostate fibroblasts and epithelial cells in co-culture maintain the BPH phenotype. Urol Int 61: 1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bright RK, Vocke CD, Emmert-Buck MR, Duray PH, Solomon D, Fetsch P, Rhim JS, Linehan WM, Topalian SL (1997) Generation and genetic characterization of immortal human prostate epithelial cell lines derived from primary cancer specimens. Cancer Res 57: 995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bristow RG, Benchimol S, Hill RP (1996) The p53 gene as a modifier of intrinsic radiosensitivity: implications for radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 40: 197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Britten RA, Murray D (1997) Constancy of the relative biological effectiveness of 42 MeV (p→Be+) neutrons among cell lines with different DNA repair proficiencies. Radiat Res 148: 308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    deKernion J, Belldegrun A, Naitoh J (1998) Surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer: indications, techniques and results. In: Belldegrun A, Kirby RS, Oliver T (eds) New perspectives in prostate cancer. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 189Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dikomey E, Dahm-Daphi J, Brammer I, Martensen R, Kaina B (1998) Correlation between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired double strand breaks studied in nine mammalian cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol 73: 269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fertil B, Dertinger H, Courdi A, Malaise EP (1984) Mean inactivation dose: a useful concept for intercomparison of human cell survival curves. Radiat Res 99: 73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frankenberg-Schwager M (1989) Review of repair kinetics for DNA damage induced in eukaryotic cells in vitro by ionizing radiation. Radiother Oncol 14: 307Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han M, Partin AW (2001) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In: Chung LWK, Isaacs WB, Simons JW (eds) Prostate cancer: biology, genetics, and the new therapeutics. Humana Press, New Jersey, p 386Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayward SW, Dahiya R, Cunha GR, Bartek J, Deshpande N, Narayan P (1995) Establishment and characterization of an immortalised but non-transformed human prostate epithelial cell line: BPH-1. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 31A: 14Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E, Karr JP, Rosenthal H, Ming Chu T, Mirand EA, Murphy GP (1983) LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res 43:1809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karran P (2000) DNA double strand break repair in mammalian cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10: 144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kysela BP, Michael BD, Arrand JE (1993) Relative contributions of initial DNA damage and repair of double strand breaks to the ionising radiation-sensitive phenotype of the Chinese hamster cell mutant, XR–V15B. Part 1: X–rays. Int J Radiat Biol 63: 609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee JM, Bernstein A (1995) Apoptosis, cancer and the p53 tumour suppressor gene. Cancer Metastasis Rev 14: 149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maity A, Kao GD, Muschel RJ, McKenna WG (1997) Potential molecular targets for manipulating the radiation response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37: 639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McMillan TJ, Eady JJ, Holmes A, Peacock JH (1989) The radiosensitivity of human neuroblastoma: a cellular and molecular study. Int J Radiat Biol 56: 651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morgan SE, Kastan MB (1997) p53 and ATM: cell cycle, cell death, and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 71: 1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nunez MI, McMillan TJ, Valenzuela MT, Ruiz de Almodovar JM, Pedraza V (1996) Relationship between DNA damage, rejoining and cell killing by radiation in mammalian cells. Radiother Oncol 39: 155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olive PL, Banath JP, MacPhail HS (1994) Lack of a correlation between radiosensitivity and DNA double-strand break induction or rejoining in six human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 54: 3939PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raqde H, Elqamal AA, Snow PB, Brandt J, Bartolucci AA, Nadir BS, Korb LJ (1998) Ten-year disease free survival after transperineal sonography-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy with or without 45-gray external beam irradiation in the treatment of patients with clinically localized, low to high Gleason grade prostate carcinoma. Cancer 83: 989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roos WP, Binder A, Bohm L (2000) Determination of the initial DNA damage and residual DNA damage remaining after 12 hours of repair in eleven cell lines at low doses of irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 76: 1493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruiz de Almodovar JM, Nunez MI, McMillan TJ, Olea N, Mort C, Villalobos M, Pedraza V, Steel GG (1994) Initial radiation-induced DNA damage in human tumour cell lines: a correlation with intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity, Br J Cancer 69: 457Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz JL, Rotmensch J, Giovanazzi S, Cohen MB, Weichselbaum RR (1988) Faster repair of DNA double-strand breaks in radioresistant human tumor cells, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15: 907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwartz JL, Mustafi R, Beckett MA, Weichselbaum RR (1990) Prediction of the sensitivity of human squamous cell carcinoma cells using DNA filter elution. Radiat Res 123: 1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Serafin AM, Binder AB, Bohm L (2001) Chemosensitivity of prostatic tumour cell lines under conditions of G2 block abrogation. Urol Res 29: 221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smeets MFMA, Mooren EHM, Begg AC (1993) Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in radiosensitive and radioresistant human tumour cells measured by field inversion gel electrophoresis. Int J Radiat Biol 63: 703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Theron T, Binder A, Verheye-Dua F, Bohm L (2000) The role of G2–block abrogation, DNA double-strand break repair and apoptosis in the radiosensitisation of melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma cell lines by pentoxifylline. Int J Radiat Biol 76: 1197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weichselbaum RR, Beckett MA, Schwartz JL, Dritschilo A (1988) Radioresistant tumor cells are present in head-and-neck carcinomas that recur after radiotherapy, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14: 575Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whitmore WF (1984) Irradiation and/or surgery: some areas of confrontation in urologic oncology. Am J Clin Oncol 7: 606Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wlodek D, Banath J, Olive PL (1991) Comparison between pulsed field and constant field electrophoresis for measurement of DNA double-strand breaks in irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells. Int J Radiat Biol 60: 779PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio M. Serafin
    • 1
  • John M. Akudugu
    • 1
  • Lothar Böhm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyRadiobiology LaboratorySouth Africa

Personalised recommendations