Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 540–542

The Closest BLAST Hit Is Often Not the Nearest Neighbor

  • Liisa B. Koski
  • G. Brian Golding
Letter to the Editor

Abstract

It is well known that basing phylogenetic reconstructions on uncorrected genetic distances can lead to errors in their reconstruction. Nevertheless, it is often common practice to report simply the most similar BLAST (Altschul et al. 1997) hit in genomic reports that discuss many genes (Ruepp et al. 2000; Freiberg et al. 1997). This is because BLAST hits can provide a rapid, efficient, and concise analysis of many genes at once. These hits are often interpreted to imply that the gene is most closely related to the gene or protein in the databases that returned the closest BLAST hit. Though these two may coincide, for many genes, particularly genes with few homologs, they may not be the same. There are a number of circumstances that can account for such limitations in accuracy (Eisen 2000). We stress here that genes appearing to be the most similar based on BLAST hits are often not each others closest relative phylogenetically. The extent to which this occurs depends on the availability of close relatives present in the databases. As an example we have chosen the analysis of the genomes of a crenarcheaota species Aeropyrum pernix, an organism with few close relatives fully sequenced, and Escherichia coli, an organism whose closest relative, Salmonella typhimurium, is completely sequenced.

BLAST hits — Nearest-neighbor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997): Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3444PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eisen JA (2000): Horizontal gene transfer among microbial genomes: new insights from complete genome analysis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10:606–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eisen JA (1998): Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Res 8: 163–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisen JA, Hanawalt PC (1999): A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes. Mutat Res 435:171–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freiberg C, Fellay R, Bairoch A, Broughton WJ, Rosenthal A, Perret X (1997): Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes. Nature 387:394–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Golding GB (1983): Estimates of DNA and protein sequence divergence: an examination of some assumptions. Mol Biol Evol 1:125–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lawrence JG, Ochman H (1998): Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9413–9417PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nelson KE, Clayton RA, Gill SR, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Nelson WC, Ketchum KA, McDonald L, Utterback TR, Malek JA, Linher KD, Garrett MM, Stewart AM, Cotton MD, Pratt MS, Phillips CA, Richardson D, Heidelberg J, Sutton GG, Fleischmann RD, Eisen JA, Fraser CM, et al (1999): Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima. Nature 399:323–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ribeiro S, Golding GB (1998): The mosaic nature of the eukaryotic nucleus. Mol Biol Evol 15:779–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruepp A, Graml W, Santos-Martinez ML, Koretke KK, Volker C, Mewes HW, Frishman D, Stocker S, Lupas AN, Baumeister W (2000): The genome sequence of the thermoacidophilic scavenger Thermoplasma acidophilum. Nature 407:508–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sicheritz-Ponten T, Anderson GE (2001): A phylogenomic approach to microbial evolution. Nucl Acids Res 29:545–552PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A (1996): Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum- likelihood method for recontructing tree topoplogies. Mol Biol Evol 13:964–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tourasse NJ, Gouy M (1999): Accounting for evolutionary rate variation among sequence sites consistently changes universal phylogenies deduced from rRNA and protein-coding genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 13:159–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Woese CR (1987): Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 51:221–271PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liisa B. Koski
    • 1
  • G. Brian Golding
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations