Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 98–101 | Cite as

The Non-Biological Meaning of the Term “Prokaryote” and Its Implications

  • Massimo Di Giulio
Letter to the Editor

Abstract

The meaning of the term prokaryote is critically analyzed. The conclusion reached is that this term does not have a real biological sense, above all because we are not able to link to this term a specific biological characteristic, i.e. the hypothetical evolutionary stage of the prokaryote would seem to have been unable to result in a completed cell, which could possibly be due to the recapitulation of the fundamental characteristics that might have been common to bacteria and archaea. This would define a biological immaturity of this evolutionary stage because otherwise we would have found traits already clearly defined at this level of cellular evolution. Therefore, the lack of well-defined traits characterising the prokaryote would seem to imply an evolutionary stage still in rapid evolution, i.e. with a tempo and a mode of evolution typical of a progenote. This in turn would seem to imply that the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) has been a progenote at least when the domains of life are only two—the bacterial and archaeal domains—because, in this case, the LUCA’s node should coincide with that of prokaryote on the tree of life. Instead, if the root of the tree of life would be placed in the bacterial domain or in the archaeal one, we might again, very likely, have a LUCA with a character of progenote being, under these conditions, the LUCA a prokaryote-like organism.

Keywords

Progenote LUCA Evolutionary stages Protocell 

References

  1. Becerra A, Delaye L, Islas S, Lazcano A (2007) The very early stages of biological evolution and the nature of the last universal common ancestor of the three major cell domains. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 8:361–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delaye L, Becerra A, Lazcano A (2002) The nature of the last common ancestor. In: de Pouplana LR (ed) The genetic code and the origin of life. Landes Bioscience, GeorgetownGoogle Scholar
  3. Delaye L, Becerra A, Lazcano A (2005) The universal common ancestor: what’s in a name? Orig Life Evol Biosph 35:537–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Giulio M (2001) The non-universality of the genetic code: the universal ancestor was a progenote. J Theor Biol 209:345–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Giulio M (2011) The Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) and the Ancestors of Archaea and Bacteria were Progenotes. J Mol Evol 72:119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolan MF, Margulis L (2007) Advances in biology reveal truth about prokaryotes. Nature 445:21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doolittle WF, Brown JR (1994) Tempo mode the progenote and the universal root. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6721–6728PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doolittle WF, Zhaxybayeva O (2009) On the origin of the prokaryotic species. Genome Res 19:744–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doolittle WF, Zhaxybayeva O (2013) What is a prokaryote? E. Rosenberg et al. (eds.), The Prokaryotes—Prokaryotic Biology and Symbiotic Associations, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg pp. 21–37Google Scholar
  10. Forterre P (2013) The common ancestor of archaea and eukarya was not an archaeon. Archaea 2013:372396. doi: 10.1155/2013/372396 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox-Keller E (2010) The mirage of a space between nature and nurture. Duke Univesity Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glansdorff N, Xu Y, Labedan B (2008) The last universal common, ancestor: emergence constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner. Biol Direct 3:29PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gogarten JP (1995) The early evolution of cellular life. Trends Ecol Evol 10:147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim KM, Caetano-Anolles G (2011) The proteomic complexity and rise of primordial ancestor of diversified life. BMC Evol Biol 11:140PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazcano A (1995) Cellular evolution during the early Archean: what happened between the progenote and the cenancestor? Microbiol SEM 11:185–198Google Scholar
  16. Martin W, Koonin EV (2006) A positive definition of prokaryotes. Nature 442:868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mat WK, Xue H, Wong JT (2008) The genomics of LUCA. Front Biosci 3:5605–5613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mushegian AR, Koonin EV (1996) A minimal gene set for cellular life derived by comparison of complete bacterial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10268–10273PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ouzounis C, Kyrpides N (1996) The emergence of major cellular processes in evolution. FEBS Lett 390:119–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ouzounis CA, Kunin V, Darzentas N, Goldovsky L (2006) A minimal estimate for the gene content of the last universal common ancestor. Res Microbiol 157(1):57–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pace NR (2006) Time for a change. Nature 441:289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pace NR (2009) Rebuttal: the modern concept of prokaryote. J Bacteriol 191:2006–2007PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spieth J, Brooke G, Kuersten S, Lea K, Blumenthal T (1993) Operons in C. elegans: polycistronic mRNA precursors are processed by trans-splicing of SL2 to downstream coding regions. Cell 73:521–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sprinzl M, Vassilenko KS (2005) Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acid Res 33:D139–D140PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tuller T, Birin H, Gophna U, Kupiec M, Ruppin E (2010) Reconstruction ancestral gene content by coevolution. Genome Res 20:122–132PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whitman WB (2009) The modern concept of the Procaryote. J Bacteriol 191:2000–2005PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams TA, Foster PG, Nye TM, Cox CJ, Embley TM (2012) A congruent phylogenomic signal places eukaryotes within the Archaea. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:4870–4879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams TA, Foster PG, Cox CJ, Embley TM (2013) An archaeal origin of, Eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life. Nature 504:231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woese CR (1987) Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Res 51:221–271Google Scholar
  30. Woese CR (1998) The universal ancestor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6854–6859PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woese CR, Fox GE (1977) The concept of cellular evolution. J Mol Evol 10:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML (1990) Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4576–4579PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Early Evolution of Life Laboratory, Institute of Biosciences and BioresourcesCNRNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations