The Relative Ages of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes
- 792 Downloads
The Last Eukaryote Common Ancestor (LECA) appears to have the genetics required for meiosis, mitosis, nucleus and nuclear substructures, an exon/intron gene structure, spliceosomes, many centres of DNA replication, etc. (and including mitochondria). Most of these features are not generally explained by models for the origin of the Eukaryotic cell based on the fusion of an Archeon and a Bacterium. We find that the term ‘prokaryote’ is ambiguous and the non-phylogenetic term akaryote should be used in its place because we do not yet know the direction of evolution between eukaryotes and akaryotes. We use the term ‘protoeukaryote’ for the hypothetical stem group ancestral eukaryote that took up a bacterium as an endosymbiont that formed the mitochondrion. It is easier to make detailed models with a eukaryote to an akaryote transition, rather than vice versa. So we really are at a phylogenetic impasse in not being confident about the direction of change between eukaryotes and akaryotes.
KeywordsAkaryotes (prokaryotes) Eukaryotes older Exon/intron old Multiple centres of replication Nucleus
This work was started for the Les Treilles foundation workshop on ‘The origins of sex and of modern eukaryotes’ held in the south of France in July 2012.
- Chatton E (1925) Pansporella perplexa: amœbien à spores protégées parasite des daphnies: réflexions sur la biologie et la phylogénie des protozoaires. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Collins LJ, Chen XS, Schonfeld B (2010) The epigenetics of non-coding RNA. In: Tollefsbol T (ed) Handbook of epigenetics. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 49–61Google Scholar
- Egel R, Penny D (2007) On the origin of meiosis in eukaryotic evolution: coevolution of meiosis and mitosis from feeble beginnings. In: Egel R, Lankenau D-H (eds) Recombination and meiosis: models, means and evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 249–288Google Scholar
- Lane CE, van den Heuvel K, Kozera C, Curtis BA, Parsons BJ, Bowman S, Archibald JM (2007) Nucleomorph genome of Hemiselmis andersenii reveals complete intron loss and compaction as a driver of protein structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19908–19913PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Penny D, Poole AM (2003) Lateral gene transfer: some theoretical aspects. N Z BioSci 12:32–35Google Scholar
- Poole AM (2010) Eukaryote evolution: the importance of the stem group. In: Caetano-Anolles G (ed) Evolutionary genomics and systems biology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar