Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 77, Issue 1–2, pp 1–2 | Cite as

Biological Intuition in Alignment-Free Methods: Response to Posada

Letters to the Editor

Abstract

A recent editorial in Journal of Molecular Evolution highlights opportunities and challenges facing molecular evolution in the era of next-generation sequencing. Abundant sequence data should allow more-complex models to be fit at higher confidence, making phylogenetic inference more reliable and improving our understanding of evolution at the molecular level. However, concern that approaches based on multiple sequence alignment may be computationally infeasible for large datasets is driving the development of so-called alignment-free methods for sequence comparison and phylogenetic inference. The recent editorial characterized these approaches as model-free, not based on the concept of homology, and lacking in biological intuition. We argue here that alignment-free methods have not abandoned models or homology, and can be biologically intuitive.

Keywords

Alignment-free methods Homology Phylogenomics Evolutionary models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support from The University of Queensland.

References

  1. Carlson R (2003) The pace and proliferation of biological technologies. Biosecur Bioterror 1:203–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan CX, Ragan MA (2013) Next-generation phylogenomics. Biol Direct 8:3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Domazet-Lošo M, Haubold B (2011) Alignment-free detection of local similarity among viral and bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 27:1466–1472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hall BK (ed) (1994) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  5. Mar JC, Harlow TJ, Ragan MA (2005) Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation. BMC Evol Biol 5:8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Posada D (2013) Phylogenetic models of molecular evolution: next-generation data, fit, and performance. J Mol Evol. doi:10.1007/s00239-013-9566-z
  7. Reinert G, Chew D, Sun F, Waterman MS (2009) Alignment-free sequence comparison (I): statistics and power. J Comput Biol 16:1615–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sboner A, Mu XJ, Greenbaum D, Auerbach RK, Gerstein MB (2011) The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think! Genome Biol 12:125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wan L, Reinert G, Sun F, Waterman MS (2010) Alignment-free sequence comparison (II): theoretical power of comparison statistics. J Comput Biol 17:1467–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilke CO (2012) Bringing molecules back into molecular evolution. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARC Centre of Excellence in Bioinformatics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations