Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 69–73 | Cite as

The Enrichment of TATA Box and the Scarcity of Depleted Proximal Nucleosome in the Promoters of Duplicated Yeast Genes

Article

Abstract

Population genetic theory of gene duplication suggests that the preservation of duplicate copies requires functional divergence upon duplication. Genes that can be readily modified to produce new gene expression patterns may thus be duplicated often. In yeast, genes exhibit dichotomous expression patterns based on their promoter architectures. The expression of genes that contain TATA box or occupied proximal nucleosome (OPN) tends to be variable and respond to external signals. On the other hand, genes without TATA box or with depleted proximal nucleosome (DPN) are expressed constitutively. We find that recent duplicates in the yeast genome are heavily biased to be TATA box containing genes and not to be DPN genes. This suggests that variably expressed genes, due to the functional organization in their promoters, have higher duplicability than constitutively expressed genes.

Keywords

Gene duplication TATA box Nucleosome Transcription plasticity Yeast 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for Drs. Jianzhi Zhang, Antonio Marco Castillo, Sudhir Kumar and anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved this manuscript. This research was supported by National Science Foundation [DEB-0449581 to Y.K.] and by Arizona State University.

References

  1. Babbitt GA, Kim Y (2008) Inferring natural selection on fine-scale chromatin organization in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 25:1714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF (2004) Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell 116:699–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiang EFL, Yan YL, Guiguen Y, Postlethwait J, Chung B (2001) Two Cyp19 (P450 Aromatase) genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes are expressed in ovary or brain. Mol Biol Evol 18:542–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Field Y, Kaplan N, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Moore IK, Sharon E, Lubling Y, Widom J, Segal E (2008) Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Field Y, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Moore IK, Mieczkowski P, Kaplan N, Lubling Y, Lieb JD, Widom J, Segal E (2009) Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization. Nat Genet 41:438–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y, Postlethwait J (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531–1545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11:4241–4257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ha M, Kim ED, Chen ZJ (2009) Duplicate genes increase expression diversity in closely related species and allopolyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:2295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. He X, Zhang J (2005a) Gene complexity and gene duplicability. Curr Biol 15:1016–1021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. He X, Zhang J (2005b) Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169:1157–1164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. He X, Zhang J (2006) Higher duplicability of less important genes in yeast genomes. Mol Biol Evol 23:144–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughes AL (1994) The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 256:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ioshikhes IP, Albert I, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF (2006) Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat Genet 38:1210–1215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES (2003) Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423:241–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, Hughes TR, Nislow C (2007) A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 39:1235–1244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynch M, Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohno S (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Prachumwat A, Li W-H (2006) Protein function, connectivity, and duplicability in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 23:30–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tirosh I, Barkai N (2008) Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res 18:1084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tirosh I, Weinberger A, Carmi M, Barkai N (2006) A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nat Genet 38:830–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang J (2003) Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol 18:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuseob Kim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jang H. Lee
    • 2
  • Gregory A. Babbitt
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.The Center for Evolutionary Functional Genomics, The Biodesign InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations