Formal Proof that the Split Genes of tRNAs of Nanoarchaeum equitans Are an Ancestral Character

Article

Abstract

A proof is given that the genes of the tRNA molecule of Nanoarchaeum equitans split into the 5′ and 3′ halves are an ancestral trait. First, the existence of a natural succession of evolutionary stages will be proven, formed in the order of the three gene structures of tRNAs known today: (i) the split genes of tRNAs, (ii) the genes of tRNAs with introns, and (iii) the genes of tRNAs continuously codifying for the tRNA molecule. This succession of evolutionary stages identifies the split genes of tRNAs as a pleisiomorphic character. The proof that this succession of evolutionary stages is, moreover, true is performed by proving that all the possible remaining five successions of evolutionary stages are false. Indeed, the succession of evolutionary stages considering split genes as a derived character turns out to be false in that the increase in complexity inherent to this succession cannot be justified by the split genes of tRNAs because these could not have conferred any selective advantage justifying this increase in complexity. Furthermore, genetic drift is unable to explain the evolution of split genes of tRNAs because of the enormous genetic effective size of the population observed in these organisms. The remaining four successions of evolutionary stages are also false because: (i) they are not natural successions of evolutionary stages, (ii) the absolute observed frequencies of these evolutionary stages are such as to exclude categorically that they might be natural successions of evolutionary stages, and also (iii) two of these are falsified by the fact that they do not place the evolutionary stage of genes of tRNAs with introns in a close evolutionary relationship with that of the split genes of tRNAs which can, instead, be proven to have a close evolutionary link. Therefore, there remains only the succession of evolutionary stages considering the split genes of tRNAs codifying for the 5′ and 3′ halves, as a pleisiomorphic character, as the only succession compatible with all the arguments presented in this article and as the one that actually operated during the evolution of the tRNA molecule. This proof has two very important implications. One regards how the tRNA molecule originated; considering how tRNA originated as the union of two hairpin-like structures, the split genes of tRNAs might be the transition stage through which the evolution of this molecule passed. The other regards when the genes of tRNAs originated, reaching the conclusion that the origin of these genes is polyphyletic, i.e. not monophyletic and hence contrary to the assumptions of the current paradigm.

Keywords

Logical-evolutionary method tRNA origin Polyphyletic origin of tRNAs Molecular gene fossils Missing link Ancestral stages Transition stages Evolutionary stages Evolutionary sequences Natural sequences of evolutionary stages Macroevolution 

References

  1. Brochier C, Gribaldo S, Zivanovic Y, Confalonieri F, Forterre P (2005) Nanoarchaea: representatives of a novel archaeal phylum or a fast evolving euryarchaeal lineage related to Thermococcales? Genome Biol 6:R42(1–10)Google Scholar
  2. Di Giulio M (1992) On the origin of the transfer RNA molecule. J Theor Biol 159:199–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Di Giulio M (1995) Was it an ancient gene codifyng for a hairpin RNA that, by means of direct duplication, gave rise to the primitive tRNA molecule? J Theor Biol 177:95–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Giulio M (1999) The non-monophyletic origin of tRNA molecule. J Theor Biol 197:403–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Giulio M (2004) The origin of the tRNA molecule: implications for the origin of protein synthesis. J Theor Biol 226:89–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Giulio M (2006a) The non-monophyletic origin of the tRNA molecule and the origin of genes only after the evolutionary stage of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA). J Theor Biol 240:343–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Giulio M (2006b) Nanoarchaeum equitans is a living fossil. J Theor Biol 242:257–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Giulio M (2008a) Permuted tRNA genes of Cyanidioschyzon merolae, the origin of the tRNA molecule and the root of the Eukarya domain. J Theor Biol 253:587–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Giulio M (2008b) Split genes, ancestral genes. In: Wong JT-F, Lazcano A (eds) Prebiotic evolution and astrobiology. Landes Bioscience, AustinGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Giulio M (2008c) Transfer RNA genes in pieces are an ancestral character. EMBO J 9:820Google Scholar
  11. Di Giulio M (2009) A comparison among the models proposed to explain the origin of the tRNA molecule: a synthesis. J Mol Evol 69:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Forterre P, Gribaldo S, Brochier-Armanet C (2009) Happy together: genomic insights into the unique Nanoarchaeum/Ignococcus association. J Biol 8:7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujishima K, Sugahara J, Kikuta K, Hirano R, Sato A, Tomita M, Kanai A (2009) Tri-split tRNA is a transfer RNA made from 3 transcripts that provides insight into the evolution of fragmented tRNAs in Archaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1909–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowe TM (2009) GtRNAdb: a database of transfer RNA genes detected in genome sequence. Nucleic Acid Res 37:D93–D97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynch M (2007) The fraility of adaptive hypothesis for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8597–8604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Makarova KS, Koonin E (2005) Evolutionary and functional genomics of the Archaea. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:586–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Randau L, Soll D (2008) Transfer RNA genes in pieces. EMBO Rep 9:623–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Randau L, Munch R, Hohn M, Jahn D, Soll D (2005) Nanoarchaeum equitans creates functional tRNAs from separate genes for their 5′- and 3′-halves. Nature 433:537–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sprinzl M, Vassilenko KS (2005) Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acid Res 33:D139–D140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Widmann J, Di Giulio M, Yarus M, Knight R (2005) tRNA creation by hairpin duplication. J Mol Evol 61:524–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Molecular EvolutionInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics ‘Adriano Buzzati Traverso’, CNRNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations