Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 67, Issue 6, pp 581–593 | Cite as

A Molecular Footprint of Limb Loss: Sequence Variation of the Autopodial Identity Gene Hoxa-13

  • Tiana Kohlsdorf
  • Michael P. Cummings
  • Vincent J. Lynch
  • Geffrey F. Stopper
  • Kazuhiko Takahashi
  • Günter P. Wagner
Article

Abstract

The homeobox gene Hoxa-13 codes for a transcription factor involved in multiple functions, including body axis and hand/foot development in tetrapods. In this study we investigate whether the loss of one function (e.g., limb loss in snakes) left a molecular footprint in exon 1 of Hoxa-13 that could be associated with the release of functional constraints caused by limb loss. Fragments of the Hoxa-13 exon 1 were sequenced from 13 species and analyzed, with additional published sequences of the same region, using relative rates and likelihood-ratio tests. Five amino acid sites in exon 1 of Hoxa-13 were detected as evolving under positive selection in the stem lineage of snakes. To further investigate whether there is an association between limb loss and sequence variation in Hoxa-13, we used the random forest method on an alignment that included shark, basal fish lineages, and “eu-tetrapods” such as mammals, turtle, alligator, and birds. The random forest method approaches the problem as one of classification, where we seek to predict the presence or absence of autopodium based on amino acid variation in Hoxa-13 sequences. Different alignments tested were associated with similar error rates (18.42%). The random forest method suggested that phenotypic states (autopodium present and absent) can often be correctly predicted based on Hoxa-13 sequences. Basal, nontetrapod gnathostomes that never had an autopodium were consistently classified as limbless together with the snakes, while eu-tetrapods without any history of limb loss in their phylogeny were also consistently classified as having a limb. Misclassifications affected mostly lizards, which, as a group, have a history of limb loss and limb re-evolution, and the urodele and caecilian in our sample. We conclude that a molecular footprint can be detected in Hoxa-13 that is associated with the lack of an autopodium; groups with classification ambiguity (lizards) are characterized by a history of repeated limb loss and possible limb re-evolution.

Keywords

Hoxa-13 Molecular evolution Limb loss Squamata 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank K. Crow for help with lab molecular techniques and discussion of results, and Jacques Gauthier and Greg Watkins-Colwell (Yale Peabody Museum), Adalgisa Caccono (Yale University EEB), and David Wake (Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley) for donation of tissue samples. We thank Drs. H. Greene, J. Gauthier, and P. Weldon for discussion of morphological patterns in snakes, Dr. K. Schwenk for discussion of phylogenetic relationships in Squamata, and M. Conte for assistance with some of the analyses. T.K. was supported by a CNPq/Brazil postdoctoral fellowship (PDE-201244/2003-9) and is supported by a FAPESP/Brazil grant (05/60140-4); G.P.W. is supported by a NSF/USA grant (IOB-0445971).

Supplementary material

239_2008_9156_MOESM1_ESM.doc (40 kb)
(DOC 40 kb)

References

  1. Apesteguía S, Zaher H (2006) A Cretaceous terrestrial snake with robust hindlimbs and a sacrum. Nature 440:1037–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbiza L, Dopazo J, Dopazo H (2006) Positive selection, relaxation, and acceleration in the evolution of the human and chimp genome. PloS Comput Biol 2(4):e38/0238-0300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020038
  3. Bejder L, Hall BK (2002) Limbs in whales and limblessness in other vertebrates: mechanisms of evolutionary and developmental transformation and loss. Evol Dev 4(6):445–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandley MC, Huelsenbeck JP, Wiens JJ (2008) Rates and patterns in the evolution of snake-like body form in squamate reptiles: evidence for repeated re-evolution of lost digits and long-term persistence of intermediate body forms. Evolution 62:2042–2064Google Scholar
  5. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140Google Scholar
  6. Breiman L (2001a) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breiman L (2001b) Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat Sci 16:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth and Brooks, Pacific Grove, CAGoogle Scholar
  9. Breiman L, Cutler A, Liaw A, Wiener M (2007) Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contib/Descriptions/randomForest.html
  10. Bull JJ, Charnov EL (1985) On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39:1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caldwell MW (2003) ‘Without a leg to stand on’: on the evolution and development of axial elongation and limblessness in tetrapods. Can J Earth Sci 40:573–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caldwell MW, Lee MSY (1997) A snake with legs from the marine Cretaceous of the Middle East. Nature 386:705–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll SB (2005) Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom. W. W Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark LA, Pregibon D (1993) Tree-based models. In: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds) Statistical models in S. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 377–419Google Scholar
  15. Coates M, Rutta M (2000) Nice snake, shame about the legs. TREE 15:503–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummings MP, Myers DS (2004) Simple statistical models predict C-to-U edited sites in plant mitochondrial RNA. BMC Bioinformatics 5:132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummings MP, Segal MR (2004) Few amino acid positions in rpoB are associated with most of the rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC Bioinformatics 5:137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis AP, Witte DP, Hsieh-Li HM, Potter SS, Capecchi MR (1995) Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 and hoxd-11. Nature 375(6534):791–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis MC, Dahn RD, Shubin NH (2007) An autopodial-like pattern of Hox expression in the fins of a basal actinopterygian fish. Nature 447:473–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duboule D (1994) Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Dev Suppl 1994:135–142Google Scholar
  21. Favier B, Rijli FM, Fromental-Ramain C, Fraulob V, Chambon P, Dolle P (1996) Functional cooperation between the non-paralogous genes Hoxa-10 and Hoxd-11 in the developing forelimb and axial skeleton. Development 122(2):449–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fromental-Ramain C, Warot X, Messadecq N, LeMeur M, Dolle P, Chambon P (1996) Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. Development 122:2997–3011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fry BG, Vidal N, Norman JA, Vonk FJ, Scheib H, Ramjan FR, Kuruppu S, Fung K, Hedges SB, Richardson MK, Hodgson WC, Ignjatovic V, Summerhayes R, Kochva E (2006) Early evolution of the venom system in lizards and snakes. Nature 439(7076):584–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2000) Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155:346–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41(1):18–32Google Scholar
  27. Garland T Jr, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol 42(3):265–292Google Scholar
  28. Garland T Jr, Midford PE, Ives AR (1999) An introduction to phylogenentically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am Zool 39:374–388Google Scholar
  29. Graur D, Li WH (2000) Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Greene HW (1997) Snakes—the evolution of mystery in nature. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  31. Greene HW, Cundall D (2000) Evolutionary biology: limbless tetrapods and snakes with legs. Science 287:1939–1941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greer AE (1991) Limb reduction in squamates: identification of the lineages and discussion of the trends. J Herpetol 25:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greer AE (1992) Hyperphalangy in squamates: insights on the re-acquisition of primitive character states in limb-reduced lineages. J Herpetol 26:327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Hérault Y, Beckers J, Gérard M, Duboule D (1999) Hox gene expression in limbs: colinearity by opposite regulatory controls. Dev Biol 208:157–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Higgins DG, Bleasby AJ, Fuchs R (1992) CLUSTAL-V-improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comp Appl Biosci 8:189–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Honda M, Ota H, Kobayashi M, Nabhitabhata J, Yong HS, Hikida T (2000) Phylogenetic relationships, character evolution, and biogeography of the subfamily Lygosominae (Reptilia: Scincidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 15(3):452–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Innis JW, Margulies EH, Kardia S (2002) Integrative biology and the developing limb bud. Evol Dev 4(5):378–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Innis JW, Mortlock D, Chen Z, Ludwig M, Williams ME, Williams TM, Doyle CD, Shao Z, Glynn M, Mikulic D, Lehmann K, Mundlos S, Utsch B (2004) Polyalanine expansion in Hoxa-13: three new affected families and the molecular consequences in a mouse model. Hum Mol Genet 13(22):2841–2851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kearney M, Stuart BL (2004) Repeated evolution of limblessness and digging heads in worm lizards revealed by DNA from old bones. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 271:1677–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knosp WM, Scott V, Bäcgubger GO, Stadler HS (2004) HOXA13 regulates the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 7 to control distal limb morphogenesis. Development 131:4581–4592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kohlsdorf T, Wagner GP (2006) Evidence for the reversibility of digit loss: a phylogenetic study of limb evolution in Bachia (Gymnophthalmidae, Squamata). Evolution 60(9):1896–1912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kumazawa Y (2007) Mitochondrial genomes from major lizard families suggest their phylogenetic relationships and ancient radiations. Gene 388:19–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lande R (1978) Evolutionary mechanisms of limb loss in tetrapods. Evolution 32:73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee MSY, Scanlon JD, Caldwell MW (2000) Snake origins. Science 288:1343–1345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lynch VJ, Roth JJ, Takahashi K, Dunn C, Nonaka DF, Stopper G, Wagner GP (2004) Adaptive evolution of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 at the origin of the uterus in mammals. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 271:2201–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (1992) MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2004) Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org
  50. Marshall CR, Raff EC, Raff RA (1994) Dollo’s law and the death and resurrection of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:12283–12287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Metscher BD, Takahashi K, Crow K, Amemiya C, Nonaka DF, Wagner GP (2005) Expression of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 in the pectoral fin of a basal ray-finned fish, Polyodon spathula: implications for the origin of tetrapod limbs. Evol Dev 7(3):186–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mortlock DP, Innis JW (1997) Mutation of HOXA-13 in hand-foot-genital syndrome. Nat Genet 15:179–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mortlock DP, Sateesh P, Innis JW (2000) Evolution of N-terminal sequences of the vertebrate Hoxa-13 protein. Mammal Gen 11:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Burke AC, Laufer E, DiMambro E, Murtaugh LC, Gonzales E, Tessarollo L, Parada LF, Tabin C (1996) Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development 122:1449–1466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pagel MD (1992) A method for the analysis of comparative data. J Theor Biol 156:431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pond SLK, Frost SDW, Muse SV (2005) HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21(5):676–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Post LC, Innis JW (1999) Altered Hox expression and increased cell death distinguish Hypodactyly from Hoxa13 null mice. Int J Dev Biol 43:287–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pough FH, Andrews RM, Cadle JE, Crump ML, Savitzki AH, Wells KD (1998) Herpetology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  59. Rage JC (2001) Fossil history. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT, Novak SS (eds) Snakes—ecology and evolutionary biology. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJGoogle Scholar
  60. Rage JC, Escuillié F (2000) Un nouveau serpent bipède du Cénomanien (Crétacé) Implications phylétiques. CR Acad Sci Paris 330:513–520Google Scholar
  61. Rechavi MR, Huchon D (2000) RRTree: relative-rate tests between groups of sequences on a phylogenetic tree. Bioinformatics 16:296–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roberts DJ, Johnson RL, Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C (1995) Sonic hedgehog is an endodermal signal inducing Bmp-4 and Hox genes during induction and regionalization of the chick hindgut. Development 121:3163–3174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Robinson M, Gouy M, Gautier C, Mouchiroud D (1998) Sensitivity of the relative-rate test to taxonomic sampling. Mol Biol Evol 15(9):1091–1098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Segal MR, Cummings MP, Hubbard AE (2001) Relating genotype to phenotype: analysis of peptide binding data. Biometrics 57:632–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shubin NH, Alberch P (1986) A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. Evol Biol 20:319–387Google Scholar
  66. Stadler HS, Higgins KM, Capecchi MR (2001) Loss of Eph-receptor expression correlates with loss of cell adhesion and chondrogenic capacity in Hoxa-13 mutant limbs. Development 128:4177–4188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Stopper GS, Wagner GP (2005) Of chicken wings and frog legs: a somrgasbord of evolutionary variation in mechanisms of tetrapod limb development. Dev Biol 288:21–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tchernov E, Rieppel O, Zaher H, Polcyn MJ, Jacobs LL (2000) A fossil snake with limbs. Science 287:2010–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teotónio H, Rose MR (2001) Perspective: reverse evolution. Evolution 55(4):653–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Torok MA, Gardiner DM, Shubin NH, Bryant SV (1998) Expression of HoxD genes in developing and regenerating axolotl limbs. Dev Biol 200:225–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Veraksa A, Campo MD, McGinnis W (2000) Developmental patterning genes and their conserved functions: from model organisms to humans. Mol Genet Metab 69:85–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vidal N, Hedges BS (2005) The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. CR Biol 328:1000–1008Google Scholar
  74. Wagner GP, Lynch VJ (2008) The gene regulatory logic of transcription factor evolution. Tree 23(7):377–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagner GP, Khan PA, Blanco MJ, Misof G, Liversage RA (1999) Evolution of Hoxa-11 expression in amphibians: is the urodele autopodium an innovation? Am Zool 39:686–694Google Scholar
  76. Wagner GP, Takahashi K, Lynch VJ, Prohaska SJ, Fried C, Stadler PF, Amemiya C (2005) Molecular evolution of duplicated ray finned fish HoxA clusters: increased synonymous substitution rate and asymmetrical co-divergence of coding and noncoding sequences. J Mol Evol 60:665–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wake DB, Marks SB (1993) Development and evolution of plethodontid salamanders—a review of prior studies and a prospectus for future research. Herpetologica 49:194–203Google Scholar
  78. Wake DB, Shubin N (1994) Urodele limb development in relation to phylogeny and life history. J Morphol 220:407–408Google Scholar
  79. West-Eberhard M (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  80. Whiting AS, Bauer AM, Sites JW (2003) Phylogenetic relationships and limb loss in sub-Saharan African scincine lizards (Squamata: Scincidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:582–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiens JJ, Brandley MC, Reeder TW (2006) Why does a trait evolve multiple times within a clade? Repeated evolution of snakelike body form in squamate reptiles. Evolution 60:123–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wright S (1968) Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol I. Genetic and biometric foundations, University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  83. Yang Z (1997) PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comp Appl Biosci 13:555–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yokouchi Y, Nakazato S, Yamamoto M, Goto Y, Kameda T, Iba H, Kuroiwa A (1995) Misexpression of Hoxa–13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. Gen Dev 9:2509–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Young BA, Marsit C, Meltzer K (1999) Comparative morphology of the cloacal scent gland in snakes (Serpentes: Reptilia). Anat Rec 256(2):127–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zákány J, Duboule D (1999) Hox genes in digit development and evolution. Cell Tissue Res 296:19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z (2005) Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol 22(12):2472–2479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiana Kohlsdorf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael P. Cummings
    • 3
  • Vincent J. Lynch
    • 1
  • Geffrey F. Stopper
    • 1
  • Kazuhiko Takahashi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Günter P. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de BiologiaFFCLRP, University of São PauloRibeirao PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Center for Bioinformatics and Computational BiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  4. 4.National Institute for Basic BiologyOkazaki National Research InstitutesOkazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations