Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Experimental Evolution of Gene Duplicates in a Bacterial Plasmid Model

  • Alisha K. Holloway
  • Timothy Palzkill
  • James J. Bull
Article

Abstract

The fate of gene duplicates subjected to diversifying selection was tested experimentally in a bacterial system. The wild-type TEM-1 β-lactamase gene confers resistance to ampicillin but not to cefotaxime. Point mutations confer cefotaxime resistance, but they compromise ampicillin resistance. Thus, selection for both drug resistances in a bacterium with two copies of β-lactamase should favor the divergence of one copy to improve cefotaxime resistance while maintaining the other copy to preserve ampicillin resistance. This selection was performed on a bacterium with identical sequences of β-lactamase on two separate, compatible plasmids. As expected, one plasmid evolved increased cefotaxime resistance when appropriately strong cefotaxime selection was applied. However, the cefotaxime-resistant plasmid maintained sufficient ampicillin resistance to tolerate the concentration of ampicillin used, and the other plasmid was lost. Hosts carrying both the cefotaxime-resistant and wild-type plasmids were then subjected to various higher concentrations of both drugs to find conditions that would ensure the maintenance of both plasmids. In a striking contradiction to our model, no such conditions were found. The fitness cost of carrying both plasmids increased dramatically as antibiotic levels were raised, and either the wild-type plasmid was lost or the cells did not grow. This study highlights the importance of the cost of duplicate genes and the quantitative nature of the tradeoff in the evolution of gene duplication through functional divergence.

Keywords

Gene duplication β-Lactamase Diversifying selection Antibiotic resistance 

References

  1. Dykhuizen DE, Hartl DL (1983) Selection in chemostats. Microbiol Rev 47:150–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gniadkowski M, Schneider I, Jungwirth R, Hryniewicz W, Bauernfeind A (1998) Ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from three Polish hospitals: identification of three novel TEM- and SHV-5-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:514–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gu X, Wang Y, Gu J (2002) Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nature Genet 31:205–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hughes AL (1994) The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 256:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kortschak R, Tamme R, Lardelli M (2001) Evolutionary analysis of vertebrate Notch genes. Dev Genes Evol 211:350–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis EB (1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 279:565–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Livermore DM, Pitt TL (1986) Dissociation of surface properties and “intrinsic” resistance to beta lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 22:217–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Long-McGie J, Liu AD, Schellenberger V (2000) Rapid in vivo evolution of a β-lactamase using phagemids. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:121–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lynch M, Force A (2000) The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154:459–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ohno S (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Ohno S (1999) Gene duplication and the uniqueness of vertebrate genomes circa 1970-1999. Cell Dev Biol 10:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ono-Koyanagi K, Suga H, Katoh K, Miyata T (2000) Protein tyrosine phosphatases from amphioxus, hagfish, and ray: divergence of tissue-specific isoform genes in the early evolution of vertebrates. J Mol Evol 50:302–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Palzkill T, Le Q-Q, Venkatachalam KV, LaRocco M, Ocera H (1994) Evolution of antibiotic resistance: several different amino acid substitutions in an active site loop alter the substrate profile of B-lactamase. Mol Microbiol 12:217–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Petrosino JF, Baker M, Palzkill T (1999) Susceptibility of B-lactamase to core amino acid substitutions. Protein Eng 12:761–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rubin GM, Yandell MD, Wortman JR, Miklos GLG, Nelson CR, Hariharan IK (2000) Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287:2204–2215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stapleton PD, Shannon KP, French GL (1999) Construction and characterization of mutants of the TEM-1 β-lactamase containing amino acid substitutions associated with both extended-spectrum resistance and resistance to β-lactamase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1881–1887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Walsh JB (2003) Population-genetic models of the fates of duplicate genes. Genetica 118:279–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vakulenko SB, Taibi-Tronche P, Toth M, Massova I, Lerner SA, Mobashery S (1999) Effects on substrate profile by mutational substitutions at positions 164 and 179 of the class A TEM(pUC19) beta-lactamase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 274:23052–23060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alisha K. Holloway
    • 1
  • Timothy Palzkill
    • 2
  • James J. Bull
    • 3
  1. 1.Section of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology & Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Section of Integrative Biology & Institute for Cell and Molecular BiologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations