Relaxed Selection Among Duplicate Floral Regulatory Genes in Lamiales
- 195 Downloads
Polyploidization is a prevalent mode of genome diversification within plants. Most gene duplicates arising from polyploidization (paralogs) are typically lost, although a subset may be maintained under selection due to dosage, partitioning of gene function, or acquisition of novel functions. Because they experience selection in the presence of other duplicate loci across the genome, interactions among genes may also play a significant role in the maintenance of paralogs resulting from polyploidization. Previously, we identified duplicates of the genes LFY/FLO and AP3/DEF that directly interact in a floral regulatory pathway and are thought to be the result of ancient polyploidization in the Lamiales (> 50 mya). Although duplicates of MADS box genes including AP3/DEF are common throughout the angiosperm lineage, LFY/FLO duplicates in Lamiales are the first reported outside of tetraploid taxa. In order to explore hypotheses for the joint preservation of these interacting floral regulatory genes including novel LFY/FLO paralogs, here we clone FLO and DEF duplicates from additional Lamiales taxa and apply codon substitution models to test how selection acts on both genes following duplication. We find acceleration in the ratio of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous nucleotide substitutions for one (FLO) or both (DEF) paralogs that appears to be due to relaxed purifying selection as opposed to positive selection and shows a different pattern among functional domains of these genes. Several mechanisms are discussed that might be responsible for preservation of co-orthologs of FLO and DEF in Lamiales, including interactions among the genes of this regulatory pathway.
KeywordsGene duplication Floral regulatory genes
This work was supported by an NSF IGERT predoctoral fellowship and NSF dissertation improvement grant (DEB-0105176) to J.E.A., an NSF grant (DEB-0075704) to J.H.W., and an NIH grant to P.C.P. (GM54185).
- Aagaard J, Willis J, Phillips P (2005) Duplication of floral regulatory genes in the Lamiales. Am J Bot 92:1284–1293Google Scholar
- Beardsley P, Olmstead R (2002) Redefining Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma. Am J Bot 89:1093–1102Google Scholar
- Bielawski J, Yang Z (2003) Maximum likelihood methods for detecting adaptive evolution after gene duplication. JSFG 3:201–212Google Scholar
- Hughes A (1999) Adaptive evolution of genes and genomes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Stebbins G (1971) Processes of organic evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Swofford D (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), 4.0 Beta for Macintosh. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
- Yang Z (1997) PAML: a program for package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS 15:555–556Google Scholar
- Yang Z (2001) Adaptive molecular evolution. In: Balding D, Bishop M, Cannings C (eds). Handbook of statistical genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 327–350Google Scholar