Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 89–98 | Cite as

Synonymous SNPs Provide Evidence for Selective Constraint on Human Exonic Splicing Enhancers

  • David B. Carlini
  • Jordan E. Genut
Article

Abstract

The human SNP database was used to detect selection on 238 hexamers previously identified as exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs). We compared the distribution of the 238 putative ESEs in biallelic and triallelic SNPs within five different functional categories of the SNP database: synonymous, nonsynonymous, introns, UTRs, and nongenic SNPs. Since true ESEs do not function outside of exons, SNPs that disrupt ESE motifs were expected to be more common in nonexonic portions of the genome. Our results supported this expectation: ESEs were least prevalent within synonymous SNPs and most common in nongenic SNPs. There were ∼11% fewer ESEs within synonymous biallelic SNPs than expected under no selective constraint. We also compared the frequency of neutral SNPs, those where neither allele was an ESE, with deleterious SNPs, those where one or more alleles was an ESE, across the five different functional classes of SNPs. In comparison with the other functional classes of SNPs, synonymous SNPs contained an excess of neutral variants (+1.64% and +6.04% for biallelic and triallelic SNPs, respectively) and a dearth of deleterious variants (−13.11% and −52.39% for biallelic and triallelic SNPs, respectively). The observed patterns were consistent with purifying selection on the 238 hexamers to maintain their function as ESEs. However, in contrast to previous work, we did not find evidence for selection to maintain ESE function at nonsynonymous SNPs because selection at the protein level probably obscured any difference at the level of ESE function.

Keywords

Exonic splicing enhancers Single nucleotide polymorphisms Synonymous substitutions 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported in part by NSF Grant 0315468 awarded to D.B.C.

References

  1. Ast G (2004) How did alternative splicing evolve? Nat Rev Genet 5:773–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berget SM (1995) Exon recognition in vertebrate splicing. J Biol Chem 270:2411–2414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blencowe BJ (2000) Exonic splicing enhancers: mechanism of action, diversity and role in human genetic diseases. Trends Biochem Sci 25:106–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlo T, Sierra R, Berget SM (2000) A 5′ splice site-proximal enhancer binds SF1 and activates exon bridging of a microexon. Mol Cell Biol 20:3988–3995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartegni L, Chew SL, Krainer AR (2002) Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing. Nat Rev Genet 3:285–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cartegni L, Wang J, Zhu Z, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR (2003) ESEfinder: a web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3568–3571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D (1993) The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289–1303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper TA, Mattox W (1997) The regulation of splice-site selection, and its role in human disease. Am J Hum Genet 61:259–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fackenthal JD, Cartegni L, Krainer AR, Olopade O (2002) BRCA2 T2722R is a deleterious allele that causes exon skipping. Am J Hum Genet 71:625–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairbrother WG, Yeh RF, Sharp PA, Burge CB (2002) Predictive identification of exonic splicing enhancers in human genes. Science 297:1007–1013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairbrother WG, Holste D, Burge CB, Sharp PA (2004) Single nucleotide polymorphism-based validation of exonic splicing enhancers. PLoS Biol 2:1388–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fay JC, Wu C (2003) Sequence divergence, functional constraint, and selection in protein evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 4:213–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fay JC, Wyckoff GJ, Wu C (2001) Positive and negative selection in the human genome. Genetics 158:1227–1234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Graveley BR (2000) Sorting out the complexity of SR protein functions. RNA 6:1197–1211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Graveley BR (2001) Alternative splicing: increasing diversity in the proteomic world. Trends Genet 17:100–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison PM, Kumar A, Lang N, Snyder M, Gerstein M (2002) A question of size: the eukaryotic proteome and the problems in defining it. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1083–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 431:931–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li W-H (1997) Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu H-X, Zhang M, Krainer AR (1998) Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins. Genes Dev 12:1998–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Majewski J, Ott J (2002) Distribution and characterization of regulatory elements in the human genome. Genome Res 12:1827–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Maniatis T, Tasic B (2002) Alternative pre-mRNA splicing and proteome expansion in metazoans. Nature 418:236–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Moseley CT (2002) An exon splice enhancer mutation causes autosomal dominant GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:847–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ng PC, Henikoff S (2001) Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res 11:863–874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfarr N, Prawitt D, Kirschfink M, Schroff C, Knuf M, Habermehl P, Mannhardt W, Zepp F, Fairbrother W, Loos M, Burge CB, Pohlenz J (2005) Linking C5 deficiency to an exonic splicing enhancer mutation. J Immunol 174:4172–4177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips DL, Park JW, Graveley BR (2004) A computational and experimental approach toward a priori identification of alternatively spliced exons. RNA 10:1838–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rappsilber J, Ryder U, Lamond A, Mann M (2002) Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res 12:1231–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shiga N (1997) Disruption of the splicing enhancer sequence within exon 27 of the dystrophin gene by a nonsense mutation induces partial skipping of the exon and is responsible for Becker muscular dystrophy. J Clin Invest 100:2204–2210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Sorek R, Ast G (2003) Intronic sequences flanking alternatively spliced exons are conserved between human and mouse. Genome Res 13:1631–1637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Staley JP, Guthrie C (1998) Mechanical devices of the spliceosome: motors, clocks, springs, and things. Cell 92:315–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Steiner B, Truninger K, Sanz J, Schaller A, Gallati S (2004) The role of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms on exon 9 and exon 12 skipping in nonmutated CFTR alleles. Hum Mutat 24:120–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sterner DA, Berget SM (1993) In vivo recognition of a vertebrate mini-exon as an exon-intron-exon unit. Mol Cell Biol 13:2677–2687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun H, Chasin LA (2000) Multiple splicing defects in an intronic false exon. Mol Cell Biol 20:6414–6425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sunyaev S, Ramensky V, Bork P (2000) Towards a structural basis of human non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms. Trends Genet 16:198–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yeo G, Hoon S, Venkatesh B, Burge CB (2004) Variation in sequence and organization of splicing regulatory elements in vertebrate genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15700–15705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang XH-F, Heller K, Hefter I, Leslie CS, Chasin LA (2003) Sequence information for the splicing of human pre-mRNA identified by support vector machine classification. Genome Res 13:2637–2650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyAmerican UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations