Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 57, Supplement 1, pp S190–S200 | Cite as

Power of Neutrality Tests to Detect Bottlenecks and Hitchhiking

  • Frantz DepaulisEmail author
  • Sylvain Mousset
  • Michel Veuille


The power of several neutrality tests to reject a simple bottleneck model is examined in a coalescent framework. Several tests are considered including some relying on the frequency spectrum of mutations and some reflecting the linkage disequilibrium structure of the data. We evaluate the effect of the age and of the strength of the bottleneck, and their interaction. We contrast two qualitatively different bottleneck effects depending on their strength. In genealogical terms, during severe bottlenecks, all lineages coalesce leading to a star-like gene genealogy of the sample. Some time after the bottleneck, once new mutations have arisen, they tend to show an excess of rare variants and a slight excess of haplotypes. On the contrary, more moderate bottlenecks allow several lineages to survive the demographic crash, leading to a balanced genealogy with long internal branches. Soon after the event, data tend to show an excess of intermediate frequency variants and a deficit of haplotypes. We show that for moderate sequencing efforts, severe bottlenecks can be detected only after an intermediate time period has allowed for mutations to occur, preferably by frequency spectrum statistics. Moderate bottlenecks can be more easily detected for more recent events, especially using haplotype statistics. Finally, for a single locus, the bottleneck results closely approximate those of a simple hitchhiking model. The main difference concerns the frequency distribution of mutations and haplotypes after moderate perturbations. Hitchhiking increases the number of rare ancestral mutations and leads to a more predominant major haplotype class. Thus, despite a number of common features between the two processes, hitchhiking cannot be strictly modeled by bottlenecks.


Nucleotide polymorphism Neutrality tests Haplotype Coalescence Bottleneck Hitchhiking 


  1. 1.
    Andolfatto, P, Wall, JD, Kreitman, M 1999Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics15312971311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barton, NH 1998The effect of hitch-hiking on neutral genealogies.Genet Res72123133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barton, NH 2000Genetic hitchhiking.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci35515531562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braverman, JM, Hudson, RR, Kaplan, NL, Langley, CH, Stephan, W 1995The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms.Genetics140783796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Depaulis, F, Mousset, S, Veuille, M 2001Haplotype tests using coalescent simulations conditional on the number of segregating sites.Mol Biol Evol1811361138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Depaulis, F, Mousset, S, Veuille, M in pressDetecting selective sweeps with haplotype tests.Nurminsky, D eds. Selective sweep.Landes BioscienceGeorgetown, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Depaulis, F, Veuille, M 1998Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model.Mol Biol Evol1517881790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ewens, WJ 1972The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles.Theor Pop Biol387112Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fay, JC, Wu, CI 1999A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation.Mol Biol Evol1610031005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fay, JC, Wu, CI 2000Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.Genetics15514051413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felsenstein, J 1992Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: inefficiency of pairwise and segregating sites as compared to phylogenetic estimates.Genet Res59139147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu, YX 1996New statistical tests of neutrality for DNA samples from a population.Genetics143557570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fu, YX 1997Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection.Genetics147915925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fu, YX, Li, WH 1993Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.Genetics133693709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galtier, N, Depaulis, F, Barton, NH 2000Detecting bottlenecks and selective sweeps from DNA sequence polymorphism.Genetics155981987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hudson, RR 1993The how and why of generating gene genealogies.Takahata, NClarck, AG eds. Mechanism of molecular evolution.Japan Scientific Societies PressSinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA2336Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hudson, RR, Bailey, K, Skarecky, D, Kwiatowski, J, Ayala, FJ 1994Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics13613291340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hudson, RR, Kaplan, NL 1985Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences.Genetics111147164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hudson, RR, Kreitman, M, Aguadé, M 1987A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data.Genetics116153159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly, JK 1997A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations.Genetics14611971206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nordborg, M, Tavaré, S 2002Linkage disequilibrium: What history has to tell us.Trends Genet188390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Przeworski, M 2002The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci.Genetics16011791189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schierup, MH, Hein, J 2000Recombination and the molecular clock.Mol Biol Evol1715781789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stephan, W, Wiehe, THE, Lenz, MW 1992The effect of strongly selected substitutions on neutral polymorphism: Analytical results based on diffusion theory.Theor Popul Biol41237254Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strobeck, C 1987Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: A test for population subdivision.Genetics117149154Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tajima, F 1989Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.Genetics123585595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wall, JD 1999Recombination and the power of statistical tests of neutrality.Genet Res746569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wall, JD 2000A comparison of estimators of the population recombination rate.Mol Biol Evol17156163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wall, JD, Hudson, RR 2001Coalescent simulations and statistical tests of neutrality.Mol Biol Evol1811341135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Watterson, GA 1975On the number of segregation sites.Theoret Popul Biol7256276Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York LLC 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frantz Depaulis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sylvain Mousset
    • 1
  • Michel Veuille
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Ecologie, CNRS UMR 7625-EPHEUniversité Pierre-et-Marie Curie, ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations