Quality of life, swallowing and speech outcomes after oncological treatment for mobile tongue carcinoma
- 5 Downloads
Surgical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) has a high impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL), as it variably affects their ability to speak, swallow and their social life. It is still debatable whether free flap tongue reconstruction has significant functional advantages over non-reconstructing techniques after tongue resection.
A case-control retrospective study was performed involving 14 patients who underwent partial glossectomy with or without floor of the mouth resection for OSCC of the mobile tongue. After resection, seven patients were reconstructed with a microvascular free flap, while seven were closed primarily or healed by secondary intention. All patients were asked to fill four questionnaires investigating their quality of life. As objective evaluation of swallowing, each patient underwent a Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and a videofluoroscopy.
Questionnaires showed an optimal global quality of life and high functional outcomes in both groups. The objective evaluation of swallowing showed a prevailing difficulty in the oral phase in both groups, without further swallowing impairment. Our data confirm excellent speech, swallowing and life quality in both microvascular reconstruction and non-reconstructive techniques groups.
Acknowledging the limited number of cases, our study showed that speech, swallowing and QoL results are similar both after large tongue defects reconstructed by microvascular free flaps, and small tongue resections managed with non-reconstructive techniques. This further underlines the importance of microvascular free flaps after extended tongue resections.
Level of evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.
KeywordsTongue cancer Microvascular reconstruction Quality of life Swallowing Free flap
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Molteni Gabriele, Ghirelli Michael, Molinari Giulia, Sassu Alessandro, Malagoli Andrea, Marchioni Daniele and Presutti Livio declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Comitato Etico dell’Area Vasta Emilia Nord, Modena; reference number 303/15) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 6.Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF et al (1999) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol 17:1008–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Jansen F, Snyder CF, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2016) Identifying cutoff scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck cancer–specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 representing unmet supportive care needs in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E1493–E1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J et al (2001) The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:870–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2017) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar