Effects of hormone therapy in patients who underwent male-to-female gender confirmation surgery
An estimated 1.4 million transgender individuals currently reside in the USA and this patient population is increasing on an annual basis (Am J Public Health 107: 1–8, 2017). Along with this census increase, there has also been an increasing number of gender confirmation surgeries being performed in the USA (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2016). Our primary objective was to study the effects of hormonal therapy on testicular volumetrics on transgender patients who underwent male-to-female (MtF) bottom gender confirmation surgery.
Retrospective review of patients who underwent MtF bottom gender confirmation surgery. Based on World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) guidelines a minimum of 1 year of hormonal therapy was required in order to be included. Two groups were analyzed based on their hormone therapy regimen (estrogen and estrogen/progesterone). Demographics, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), medications (and length of use), testicular volumetrics (weight, length of spermatic cord, volume), and post-operative complications (dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, infection, return to the OR) were analyzed.
A total of 54 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the sample population was 37.7 (± 13.3) years old. The mean difference in BMI before and after hormonal treatment was − 0.14 (± 1.7) in the estrogen only group and + 0.3 (± 1.7) in the estrogen/progesterone (combined) group (p = 0.396). The mean weight of surgical specimens in the estrogen only and in the combined group was 30.2 (± 14.9) and 24.1 (± 8.7), respectively (p = 0.033). The spermatic chord length for patients in the estrogen group was 5.4 cm (± 1.7), and 4.5 cm (± 1.6) for patients in the combined group (p = 0.009). Of all the patients, 18 presented with minor wound dehiscence of labia majora. Analysis of complications regarding to the type of hormonal therapy they received showed no difference among patients in the estrogen only and the combined group (p = 0.859).
Hormone therapy is an integral aspect of a multidisciplinary approach to transgender medicine and surgery. Further studies are required to elucidate systemic effects in detail and evaluate outcomes in a post-operative setting.
Level of Evidence: Level III, risk /prognostic study.
KeywordsTransgender Hormone therapy Orchiectomy Gender confirmation surgery
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Trishul Kapoor, MD; Joseph Banuelos, BA; Todd B. Nippoldt, MD; Pedro Ciudad, MD; Jorys Martinez-Jorge, MD; Oscar J. Manrique, MD do not have any conflict of interest.
Informed consent waiver was obtained from the institutional board review for this retrospective study and the study was deemed to be of minimal risk.
- 2.American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2016 Complete plastic surgery statistics report. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2016/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2016.pdf
- 10.Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M, Cohen-Kettenis P, DeCuypere G, Feldman J, Fraser L, Green J, Knudson G, Meyer WJ, Monstrey S, Adler RK, Brown GR, Devor AH, Ehrbar R, Ettner R, Eyler E, Garofalo R, Karasic DH, Lev AI, Mayer G, Meyer-Bahlburg H, Hall BP, Pfaefflin F, Rachlin K, Robinson B, Schechter LS, Tangpricha V, van Trotsenburg M, Vitale A, Winter S, Whittle S, Wylie KR, Zucker K (2012) Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgend 13:165–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Grant JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J et al (2011) Injustice at every turn: a Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- 21.Manrique OJ, Sabbagh MD, Ciudad P, Martinez-Jorge J, Kiranantawat K, Sitpahul N, Nippoldt TB, Charafeddine A, Chen HC (2018) Gender-confirmation surgery using the pedicle transverse colon flap for vaginal reconstruction: a clinical outcome and sexual function evaluation study. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar