Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 259–268 | Cite as

Progress in surgical strategies for treatment of simple congenital syndactyly: A systematic review

  • Jia TianEmail author
  • Till Wagner
  • Inge Hoevenaren
  • Tycho Wesselius
  • Arico Verhulst
  • Dietmar Ulrich
Review
  • 164 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Plenty of surgical strategies for treatment of simple syndactyly have been reported in the past decades. We are most interested in what progresses have been made over the recent 10 years. Our aim was to make a summary of the modified techniques that have been described in the last decade.

Methods

We reviewed English articles from PubMed and Chinese articles from CKNI and CQVIP published between January 2007 and December 2016. We limited the inclusion criteria to simple syndactyly and excluded complex, complicated, and syndrome-associated syndactylies.

Results

We identified 1650 articles and selected 94 for inclusion. Almost half of the included papers proposed modified flaps for web reconstruction. In most cases, a zigzag incision and Buck-Gramcko flaps were still the first choice to separate the fused digits and create the nail folds. Several new donor sites were recommended for skin grafts and several substitute biomaterials were introduced to replace skin grafts. External fixator devices were applied in a wider range for desyndactylization. However, it was not considered to be superior to other graft-less strategies. Postoperative complications were discussed in most papers, but an effective strategy to eradicate these is lacking.

Conclusions

With the development of biomaterials and surgeon’s experiences, more and more modified techniques have been conceived. However, no specific technique can be announced to be superior to others. Furthermore, more sensitive outcome measures should be established, and relationship between operative procedures and postoperative complications should be further defined.

Level of evidence: not ratable.

Keywords

Simple congenital syndactyly Desyndactylization Web reconstruction Skin grafts 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Jia Tian, Till Wagner, Inge Hoevenaren, Tycho Wesselius, Arico Verhulst, and Dietmar Ulrich declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. 1.
    Luo JY, CH F, Yao KB, RS H, QY D, Liu ZY (2009) A case-control study on genetic and environmental factors regarding polydactyly and syndactyly. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 30(9):903–906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pósfai E, Bánhidy F, Czeizel AE (2014) Teratogenic effect of hydroxyethylrutoside, a flavonoid derivate drug—a population-based case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27(11):1093–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Saleem AI, Al-Jobair AM (2016) Possible association between acetazolamide administration during pregnancy and multiple congenital malformations. Drug Des Devel Ther 10:1471–1476PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vekris MD, Lykissas MG, Soucacos PN, Korompilias AV, Beris AE (2010) Congenital syndactyly: outcome of surgical treatment in 131 webs. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 14(1):2–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yildirim C, Sentürk S, Keklikçi K, Akmaz I (2011) Correction of syndactyly using a dorsal separated V-Y advancement flap and a volar triangular flap in adults. Ann Plast Surg 67(4):357–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kvernmo HD, Haugstvedt JR (2013) Treatment of congenital syndactyly of the fingers. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 133(15):1591–1595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kozin SH, Zlotolow DA (2015) Common pediatric congenital conditions of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:241e–257ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hutchinson DT, Frenzen SW (2010) Digital syndactyly release. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 14(1):33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldfarb CA (2013) Congenital hand anomalies: a review of the literature, 2009-2012. J Hand Surg Am 38(9):1854–1859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saeed S, Ahmed SK, Chinoy MA, Khan MA (2015) A comparative review of three techniques of syndactyly release. J Pak Med Assoc 65(11 Suppl 3):S28–S31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Little KJ, Cornwall R (2016) Congenital anomalies of the hand—principles of management. Orthop Clin North Am 47(1):153–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braun TL, Trost JG, Pederson WC (2016) Syndactyly release. Semin Plast Surg 30(04):162–170PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sullivan MA, Adkinson JM (2016) Congenital hand differences. Plast Surg Nurs 36(2):84–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al PRISMA-P Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bulic K (2013) Long-term aesthetic outcome of fingertip reconstruction in complete syndactyly release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 38(3):281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chopra K, Tadisina KK, Patel KR, Singh DP (2013) Syndactyly repair. Eplasty 13:ic51PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coulson SG, Salibi A, Munro K (2016) “A picture says a thousand words”—novel teaching model for interdigitating flaps in syndactyly. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(9):1308–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cortez M, Femandes Júnior JV, da Silva RF, et al (2014) Surgical results from treting children with syndactyly through the collective effort system at “SOS Hand Recife” between 2005 and 2009. Rev Bras Ortop 49(4):396–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lumenta DB, Kitzinger HB, Beck H, Frey M (2010) Long-term outcomes of web creep, scar quality, and function after simple syndactyly surgical treatment. J Hand Surg Am 35(8):1323–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim JH, Kim BJ, Kwon ST (2016) Foot syndactyly: a clinical and demographic analysis. Arch Plast Surg 43(6):559–563PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tadiparthi S, Mishra A, McArthur P (2009) A modification of the Chinese island flap technique for simple incomplete syndactyly release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 34(1):99–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miyamoto J, Nagasao T, Miyamoto S (2010) Biomechanical analysis of surgical correction of syndactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):963–968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karamese M, Akdag O, Selimoglu MN, Unal Yıldıran G, Tosun Z (2016) V-Y and rectangular flap combination for syndactyly repair. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 50(2):102–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharma RK, Tuli P, Makkar SS, Parashar A (2009) End-of-skin grafts in syndactyly release: description of a new flap for web space resurfacing and primary closure of finger defects. Hand (N Y) 4(1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamashita K, Yotsuyanagi T, Yamauchi M, et al (2016) Subcutaneous pedicle V-Y flap for release of incomplete congenital syndactyly. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(8):e186–e191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lim YJ, Teoh LC, Lee EH (2007) Reconstruction of syndactyly and polysyndactyly of the toes with a dorsal pentagonal island flap: a technique that allows primary skin closure without the use of skin grafting. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(2):86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gao W, Yan H, Zhang F, et al (2011) Dorsal pentagonal local flap: a new technique of web reconstruction for syndactyly without skin graft. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(4):530–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hsu VM, Smartt JM Jr, Chang B (2010) The modified V-Y dorsal metacarpal flap for repair of syndactyly without skin grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(1):225–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sahin C, Erqun O, Kulahci Y, Sever C, Karagoz H, Ulkur E (2014) Bilobed flap for web reconstruction in adult syndactyly release: a new technique that can avoid the use of skin grafts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(6):815–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Widerberg A, Sommerstein K, Dahlin LB, Rosberg HE (2016) Long-term results of syndactyly correction by the trilobed flap technique focusing on hand function and quality of life. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 41(3):315–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wafa AM (2008) Hourglass dorsal metacarpal island flap: a new design for syndactylized web reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 33(6):905–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barabás AG, Pickford MA (2014) Results of syndactyly release using a modification of the Flatt technique. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39(9):984–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ni F, Mao H, Yang X, Zhou S, Jiang Y, Wang B (2015) The use of an hourglass dorsal advancement flap without skin graft for congenital syndactyly. J Hand Surg Am 40(1748–1754):e1Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu J, Zheng H, Chen Z, Dai X, Schilling AF, Machens HG (2015) Dorsal plane-shaped advancement flap for the reconstruction of web space in syndactyly without skin grafting: a preliminary report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(11):e167–e173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mallet C, Ilharreborde B, Jehanno P, et al (2013) Comparative study of 2 commissural dorsal flap techniques for the treatment of congenital syndactyly. J Pediatr Orthop 33(2):197–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jose RM, Timoney N, Vidyadharan R, Lester R (2010) Syndactyly correction: an aesthetic reconstruction. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 35(6):446–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cil Y, Kocman AE, Yapici AK (2009) Distally based venous flap: a new technique for the correction of syndactyly without skin graft in adult patients. Chir Organi Mov 93(3):123–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sakamoto N, Matsumura H, Komiya T, Imai R, Niyaz A, Watanabe K (2014) Syndactyly correction using a venous flap with the plantar cutaneous venous arch. Ann Plast Surg 72(6):643–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mericli AF, Black JS, Morgan RF (2015) Syndactyly web space reconstruction using the tapered M-to-V flap: a single-surgeon, 30-year experience. J Hand Surg Am 40(9):1755–1763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iida N, Watanabe A (2016) The modified 3-square flap method for reconstruction of toe syndactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e793PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saito S, Suzuki Y, Suzuki S (2015) Technique of dorsal transversely oriented transposition flap for web reconstruction in toe syndactyly surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(6):1119–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matsumine H, Yoshinaga Y, Fujiwara O, Sasaki R, Takeuchi M, Sakurai H (2011) Improved “bell-bottom” flap surgical technique for syndactyly without skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:504e–509ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tonkin MA (2009) Failure of differentiation part I: syndactyly. Hand Clin 25(2):171–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Oda T, Pushman AG, Chung KC (2010) Treatment of common congenital hand conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:121e–133ePubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sulser PS, Kalisch M, Weber DM (2016) Retroauricular full-thickness skin grafts in syndactyly repair: outcome and comparison with inguinal full-thickness skin grafts: retrospective (cross-sectional) study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 50(5):281–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marsh DJ, Floyd D (2011) Toe syndactyly revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(4):535–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Karagoz H, Sahin C, Eren F (2013) Is it a good option to use preputium as skin graft in syndactyly release? Aesthetic Plast Surg 37(4):854–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hikosaka M, Ogata H, Nakajima T, et al (2009) Advantages of open treatment for syndactyly of the foot: defining its indications. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43(3):148–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Landi A, Garagnani L, Leti Acciaro A, Lando M, Ozben H, Gagliano MC (2014) Hyaluronic acid scaffold for skin defects in congenital syndactyly release surgery: a novel technique based on the regenerative model. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39(9):994–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Duteille F, Truffandier MV, Perrot P (2016) Matriderm’ dermal substitute with split-thickness skin graft compared with full-thickness skin graft for the coverage of skin defects after surgical treatment of congenital syndactyly: results in 40 commissures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 41(3):350–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shevtsov VI, Danilkin MY (2008) Application of external fixation for management of hand syndactyly. Int Orthop 32(4):535–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mei H, Zhu G, He R, Liu K, Wu J, Tang J (2015) The preliminary outcome of syndactyly management in children with a new external separation device. J Pediatr Orthop B 24(1):56–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Agarwal A (2009) Comment on Shevtsov and Danilkin: application of external fixation for management of hand syndactyly. Int Orthop 33(2):581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Comer GC, Ladd AL (2015) Management of complications of congenital hand disorders. Hand Clin 31(2):361–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mishra A, Nelson K, McNally S, Gorst C, McArthur P (2010) Laser ablation of abnormal skin pigmentation post syndactyly release. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(10):1753–1755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yamawaki S, Naitoh M, Ishiko T, Muneuchi G, Suzuki S (2011) Keloids can be forced into remission with surgical excision and radiation, followed by adjuvant therapy. Ann Plast Surg 67(4):402–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yamawaki S, Naitoh M, Ishiko T, Aya R, Katayama Y, Suzuki S (2014) A toe keloid after syndactyly release treated with surgical excision and intralesional steroid injection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2(7):e186PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kong BY, Baek GH, Gong HS (2012) Treatment of keloid formation following syndactyly division: surgical technique. Hand Surg 17(03):433–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations