European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 71–76 | Cite as

The clinical application of free-style cutaneous perforator flaps

Case Report
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 189 Downloads

Abstract

Perforator flaps have become increasingly popular in reconstructive surgery. In theory, a flap can be based on any identified perforator, whether free or pedicled, based on the perforasome concept. In this study, we report our initial experience with free-style perforator flaps for reconstruction of complex soft tissue wounds. We present two cases of free-style cutaneous perforator flaps; one pedicled free-style perforator flap was designed and elevated adjacent to a complex hip wound and another free-style free perforator flap was elevated in the thigh based on a perforator identified within the flap territory, but no dominant perforator was present for a free anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap. In this case, a free ALT flap was converted to a free-style free perforator flap for the anterior neck reconstruction. Two free-style perforator flaps, one pedicled and one free, were successfully performed to reconstruct complex wounds of the hip and anterior neck. During more than 12 months of follow-up, both reconstructions have healed adequately with optimal contour in the reconstructed areas. This series demonstrates some of the clinical applications available using both free and pedicled freestyle perforator flaps. These free-style flaps can be used successfully with good esthetic and functional results at various regions of the body if there is a detectable perforator that can be based on as a perforator flap.

Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study

Keywords

Free-style free flaps Free-style perforator flaps Cutaneous flaps Local flaps Reconstructive surgery Microsurgery 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None

Ethical standards

For this type of retrospective study formal consent from an ethics committee is not required. All patients have given their consents to use photos presented in this manuscript.

Financial disclosure

The authors have no financial interests in any of drugs, devices, or instruments mentioned in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Koshima I, Soeda S (1989) Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 42:645–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wei FC, Mardini S (2004) Free-style free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:910–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M et al (2009) Perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lecours CL, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C et al (2010) Freestyle pedicled perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor GI, Palmer JH (1987) The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body. Experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 40:113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blondeel PN, Beyens G, Verhaege R et al (1998) Doppler flow-metry in the planning of perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg 51:202–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan UD, Miller JG (2007) Reliability of handheld Doppler in planning local perforator-based flaps for extremities. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:521–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu P, Youssef A (2006) Efficacy of the handheld Doppler in preoperative identification of the cutaneous perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap (2006). Plast Reconstr Surg 118:928–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of California at DavisSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations