European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 85–94 | Cite as

Strategies in the management of post-burn breast deformities

Original Paper



Burn injuries to the chest area may end up with severe breast deformity and asymmetry. They are frequently complex and unique to each case, affecting parenchymal development, breast implantation on chest wall, nipple areola complex position, infra-mammary fold definition, and skin envelope. Furthermore, contractures affecting adjacent territories may occur and add to the deformity. Surgical correction should address all the deformity components. Thus, a structured reconstructive plan that recruits different mammaplasty techniques and deals with adjacent territories is needed. This work presents different strategies used in treating severe post-burn breast deformities. Elaborate analyses of the deformities, surgical techniques, and outcomes are presented and a structured reconstructive plan is proposed.


Sixteen deformed breasts in 11 patients (mean age, 22 years) were managed. The techniques used included a variety of mastopexy techniques, prosthesis-based endoscopic breast reconstruction, and autologous breast augmentation with fat grafting or local flaps in some hypoplastic cases. Ancillary procedures to the neck, axilla, and abdomen were carried out to release the breast when tethered by their contractures.


Considerable improvement and reasonable symmetry were achieved in most cases. All patients were satisfied with the results, tolerated the need for multiple procedures, and accepted residual minor asymmetries.


A post-burn breast deformity has a complex nature that may be addressed on multiple stages with different techniques of mastopexy, augmentation, and reconstruction. Ancillary procedures to a contracted adjacent territory may be needed to release the breast if tethered. Adopting a structured reconstructive plan may help obtain reproducible constant results.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.


Burn Breast deformity Reconstruction Strategies 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Morrow SE, Smith DL, Cairns BA, Howell PD, Nkayama DK (1996) Etiology and outcome of pediatric burns. J Pediatr Surg 31(3):329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kunert P, Schneider W, Flory J (1988) Principles and procedures in female breast reconstruction in the young child’s burn injury. Aesthetic Plast Surg 12:101–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacLennan SE, Wells MD, Neale HW (2000) Reconstruction of the burned breast. Clin Plast Surg 27(1):113–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orr DA, Reznikoff M, Smith GM (1989) Body image, self-esteem, and depression in burn-injured adolescents and young adults. J Burn Care Rehabil 10:454–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCauley RL (2003) Reconstruction of the trunk and genitalia. In: Herndon D (ed) Total burn care, 2nd edn., vol. 2. Saunders, London, p 707Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fish J (2006) Reconstruction of the burned breast and abdomen. In: Sood R (ed) Achauer and Sood’s burn surgery reconstruction and rehabilitation, 1st edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 264–272Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakr W (2002) Local fasciocutaneous flaps in managing postburn breast deformities. Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg 26:233–239Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Psillakis JM, Woisky R (1985) Burned breast: treatment with a transverse rectus abdominis island musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 14:437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vasconez LO, Lejour M, Mabel G (1991) Contralateral upper rectus flap for breast reconstruction. In: Popow D (ed) Atlas of breast reconstruction, 1st edn. Gower Medical, New York, pp 5.2–5.4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Versaci AD, Balkovich ME, Goldstein SA (1986) Breast reconstruction by tissue expansion for congenital and postburn deformities. Ann Plast Surg 16:20–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marks MW, Argenta LC, Thornton JW (1987) Burn management: the role of tissue expansion. Clin Plast Surg 14:543–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coleman SR (2011) Structural fat grafting: basics and clinical applications in the hand, face and nose. In: Nahai F (ed) The art of aesthetic surgery: principles and techniques, vol 2, 2nd edn. Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, pp 395–473Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryan JJ (1982) A lower thoracic advancement flap in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 70:153–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guan WX, Jun YT, Cao HP (1988) Reconstruction of postburn female breast deformity. Ann Plast Surg 21:65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Khatib HA (1999) Reliability of inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty in burned oversized breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:869–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thai KN, Mertens D, Warden GD et al (1999) Reduction mammaplasty in postburn breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1882–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Payne CE, Malata CM (2003) Correction of postburn asymmetry using the LeJour-type mammaplasty technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:805–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neale HW, Kurtzman LC (1991) Reconstruction of the burned breast and abdomen. In: Achauer BM (ed) Burn reconstruction. Thieme Medical, New York, pp 148–164Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Argenta LC, Marks MW, Grabb WC (1983) Selective use of serial expansion in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 11:188–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De-Agustin JC, Morris SF, Zuker RM (1993) Tissue expansion in pediatric burn reconstruction. J Burn Care Rehabil 14(1):43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moor EV, Wexler MR, Bar ZY, Weinberg A, Chaouat M, Ad ED et al (1996) Chest wall deformity following maximal tissue expansion for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 36(2):129–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plastic Surgery DepartmentCairo UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations