Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 353–358 | Cite as

Combining muscle-sparing serratus flap with acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction

  • Smita Ramanadham
  • Chrisovalantis Lakhiani
  • Menyoli Malafa
  • Michael Lee
  • Angela Cheng
  • Michel Saint-CyrEmail author
Original Paper
  • 174 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Submuscular placement of tissue expanders is a common method of reconstruction in the postmastectomy patient. Though the pectoralis muscle provides ample coverage of the expander superomedially, it is insufficient for complete coverage. Inferior coverage has been described using both local muscle and fascial flaps as well as the more recently introduced acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Each method possesses advantages and disadvantages, while the use of both in conjunction may serve to provide a superior, cost-effective result.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction from January 2008 to December 2011. Patients who underwent reconstruction with the use of combined ADM and muscle-sparing serratus flap were selected for further review. A total of 16 patients (27 reconstructed breasts) were identified. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, operative details, and complications.

Results

Of the 16 patients, 6 received postoperative radiation and 9 received perioperative chemotherapy. Mean follow-up was 20.8 months. A single 8 × 16-cm sheet of ADM was sufficient for bilateral reconstruction. Complications included infection (three patients), mastectomy flap necrosis (two patients), expander exposure (one patient), wound dehiscence (one patient), hematoma (one patient), and seroma (one patient). There were no cases of capsular contracture. All patients were noted to have sufficient lateral fullness and optimal contour.

Conclusions

Combined use of a muscle-sparing serratus anterior flap with ADM is a safe and viable method of complete inferior expander coverage in immediate breast reconstruction, which has not yet been described in the literature. Potential advantages include decreased donor site morbidity, improved lateral fullness, and greater efficiency in ADM use.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Keywords

Breast reconstruction Tissue expander reconstruction Serratus muscle Serratus flap 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our gratitude to Ms. Martha Aceves for her gracious assistance in the preparation of the associated video.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Saint-Cyr is a consultant for LifeCell Corporation. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest with the techniques or results presented in this article.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MPG 36732 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gamboa-Bobadilla G (2006) Implant based reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56:22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breuing K, Colwell A (2007) Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 59:250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saint-Cyr M, Dauwe P, Wong C et al (2010) Use of the serratus anterior fascia flap for expander coverage in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zienowicz R, Karacaoglu E (2007) Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holle J, Pierini A (1984) Breast reconstruction with an external oblique abdominis muscle turnover flap and a bipedicled abdominal skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfil AN, Davenport MS et al (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1735Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spear S, Pelletiere C (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:2098Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saint-Cyr M, Nagarkar P, Wong C, Thakar H et al (2010) Use of pedicled subpectoral fascia flap for expander coverage in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a novel technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Namnoum JD (2009) Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parks JR, Hammond SE, Walsh WW, Adams RL et al (2012) Human acellular dermis (ACD) vs. no-ACD in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f06e
  11. 11.
    Salzberg C (2006) Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft. Ann Plast Surg 57:1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bar-Meir ED, Lin SJ, Momoh AO, Tobias AM et al (2011) The lateral chest wall: a separate aesthetic unit in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:626ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elliot LF, Ghazi BH, Otterburn DM (2011) The scarless latissimus dorsi flap for full muscle coverage in device-based immediate breast reconstruction: an autologous alternative to acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Smita Ramanadham
    • 1
  • Chrisovalantis Lakhiani
    • 1
  • Menyoli Malafa
    • 1
  • Michael Lee
    • 1
  • Angela Cheng
    • 1
  • Michel Saint-Cyr
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations