Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 75–82 | Cite as

Psychological outcomes following surgical excision of facial skin cancers

  • J. CaddickEmail author
  • J. Stephenson
  • L. Green
  • G. Spyrou
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Patients undergoing surgery for basal and early squamous cell carcinomas are rarely offered psychological support as their malignancies have a low mortality. Nonetheless, 80 % of non-melanoma skin cancers occur in the head and neck, rendering both the malignancy and subsequent surgical scar clearly visible. This study was designed to quantify the social and emotional impact of facial skin malignancies pre- and postoperatively and to identify vulnerable groups who may benefit from increased support irrespective of tumour severity.

Methods

Fifty-three patients with facial skin malignancies were prospectively evaluated before and 3 months after surgery using the Skin Cancer Index (SCI); a 15-item, validated, disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) assessment tool with emotion, social and appearance subscales. Higher scores reflect improvements in QOL.

Results

Surgical excision of the malignancy led to a significant increase in SCI (p < 0.001). Increasing age was associated with greater post-surgery QOL, controlling for baseline scores (p = 0.037). Other clinical/demographical variables were not significantly associated with SCI scores in most models; however, patients with squamous cell carcinomas reported greater improvements that those with basal cell carcinomas. Women had lower baseline scores but showed greater improvement in the emotional and appearance subscales. Men showed greater improvement in the social subscale. Preoperative SCI scores were generally better predictors of postoperative scores than demographic or clinical factors.

Conclusion

Lower preoperative SCI scores confirm the presence of anxiety among patients with cutaneous facial malignancies. Surgical excision improves social, emotional and cosmetic well-being, particularly in patients with squamous cell carcinomas. Female and younger patients appear most vulnerable to QOL anxieties preoperatively.

Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study.

Keywords

Facial skin cancer Disfigurement Quality of life Skin Cancer Index 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Davis RE, Spencer JM (1997) Basal and squamous cell cancer of the facial skin. Curr Opin Orolaryngol Head Neck Surg 5:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koster M, Bergsma J (1990) Problems and coping behaviour of facial cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 30:569–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGrouther DA (1997) Facial disfigurement, the last bastion of discrimination. Br Med J 314:991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cartwright J, Magee H (2006) The views and experiences of patients and the health professionals involved in their care—a qualitative study [WWW document]. Oxford: Picker Institute. http://www.thehealingfoundation.org/thf2008/images08/media/HFreport1-Qualitative.pdf. Accessed on 10 October 2010
  5. 5.
    Rhee JS, Matthews BA, Neuberg M et al (2005) Creation of a quality of life instrument for non-melanoma skin cancer patients. Laryngoscope 115(7):1178–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Telfer NR, Colver GB, Morton CA (2008) Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 159:35–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackford S, Roberts D, Salek MS, Finlay AY (1996) Basal cell carcinomas cause little handicap. Qual Life Res 5:191–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shah M, Coates M (2006) An assessment of the quality of life in older patients with skin disease. Br J Dermatol 154:150–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robinson E (1997) Psychological research on visible difference disfigurement. In: Lansdown R, Rumsey N, Bradbury E, Carr A, Partridge J (eds) Visibly different: coping with disfigurement. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp 102–111Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marsden JR, Newton-Bishop JA, Burrows L et al (2010) Revised UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010. Br J Dermatol 163:238–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Shakhli H, Harcourt D, Kenealy J (2006) Psychological distress surrounding diagnosis of malignant and non-malignant skin lesions at a pigmented lesion clinic. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:479–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhee JS, Matthews BA, Neuberg M et al (2006) Validation of a quality of life instrument for patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:314–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhee JS, Matthews BA, Neuberg M et al (2007) The skin cancer index: clinical responsiveness and predictors of quality of life. Laryngoscope 117:399–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caddick J, Green L, Stephenson J, Spyrou G (2012) The psycho-social impact of facial skin cancers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. doi: 10.16/j.bjps.2012.02.022
  15. 15.
    Rhee JS, Matthews BA, Neuberg M, Burzynski M, Nattinger AB (2005) Creation of a quality of life instrument for nonmelanoma skin cancer patients. Laryngoscope 115(7):1178–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott DW (1983) Anxiety, critical thinking and information processing during and after breast biopsy. Nurs Res 32(1):24–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benedict S, Williams RD, Baron PL (1994) Recalled anxiety: from discovery to diagnosis of a benign breast mass. Oncol Nurs Forum 21(10):1723–1727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Motley RJ, Preston PW, Lawrence CM (2003) Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Plast Surg 56:85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rumsey N, Clarke A, White P, Wyn-Williams M, Garlick W (2004) Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs 48(5):443–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM et al (2003) Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck 25:103–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Matozzo I et al (1984) The use of photographs of postoperative results prior to melanoma resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 74(3):380–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thorne CH (2007) Techniques and principles in plastic surgery. In: Thorne CH (ed) Grabb and Smiths plastic surgery, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 3Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gardiner MD, Topps A, Richardson G, Sacker A, Clarke A, Butler PEM (2010) Differential judgements about disfigurement: the role of location, age and gender in decisions made by observers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:73–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berman B (2001) Basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratoses: patients' perceptions of their disease and current treatments. Int J Dermatol 40:573–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Bong J, Williams H (2007) Interventions for basal cell carcinoma or the skin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD003412Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newell RJ, Clarke M (2000) Evaluation of self-help leaflet in treatment of social difficulties following facial disfigurement. Int J Nurs Stud 37:381–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Caddick
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Stephenson
    • 2
  • L. Green
    • 1
  • G. Spyrou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryPinderfields General HospitalWakefieldUK
  2. 2.School of Human and Health SciencesUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations