European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 5–6 | Cite as

Vibration sensitivity testing with tuning fork—256 Hz or 512 Hz?

  • A. Juma
  • A. Mandal
Original Paper


Outcome measures of vibratory sensitivity using a 256-Hz tuning fork depend on the perception of vibration by the patient and qualitative comparison with sensory threshold on the examiner. The authors present their experience of comparison of vibratory sensation using a 512-Hz tuning fork with the conventional 256-Hz counterpart in normal volunteers. The median visual analogue score achieved by the 512-Hz tuning fork was the same as the 256-Hz one in all the tested areas of the hand. The 512-Hz tuning fork is smaller and easier to carry and is more advantageous compared to the 256-Hz one. The authors strongly recommend the use of the 512-Hz tuning fork for the vibration sensitivity test.


Vibration Tuning fork Sensation 


  1. 1.
    Burns TM, Taly A, O’Brian PC (2002) Clinical versus quantitative vibration assessment: improving clinical performance. J Peripher Nerv Syst 7(2):112–117, JunPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hubbard MC, MacDermid JC, Kramer JF (2004) Quantitative vibration threshold testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis strategies for optimizing reliability. J Hand Ther 17(1):24–30, Jan–MarPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freeman C, Okun MS (2002) Origin of the sensory examination in neurology. Semin Neurol 22(4):399–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosecrance JC, Cook TM, Satre DL, Goode JD (1994) Vibration sensibility testing in the workplace. Day-to-day reliability. J Occup Med 36(9):1032–1037, SepPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thivolet C, El-Farkh J, Petiot A, Simonet C (1990) Measuring Vibration Sensations with graduated tuning fork. Diabetes Care 13(10):1077–1080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pestronk A, Florence J, Levine T (2004) Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork. Neurology 1:461–464, FebGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guyton AC, Hall J (2000) The nervous system: general principles and sensory physiology (unit 9). In: Guyton AC, Hall J (eds) Textbook of medical physiology (9th edn). Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 594–599Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Countess of Chester HospitalChesterUK

Personalised recommendations