Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based patient education?
- 148 Downloads
In plastic surgery patient education is important but time consuming. It can be performed face-to-face or it can be computer based. In order to examine the merits of computer-based patient education, a research of the literature was carried out. The results of this search show that computer-based education is of great potential benefit. Especially in retaining information, informed consent and time management in the medical practice.
KeywordsPatient education Computer-based patient education
We thank Dr. P. Houpt, head of the department of plastic surgery in the Isala Klinieken, for his contributions in starting a randomised trial about computer education. This would not be possible without a grant from the Isala Klinieken.
- 1.Adsit KI (1996) Multimedia in nursing and patient education. Orthop Nurs 15(4):59–63Google Scholar
- 4.Breemhaar B (1991) Effects of education and support for surgical patients: The role of perceived control. Patient Educ Couns 18:199–210Google Scholar
- 5.Breemhaar B (1992) Voorlichting aan operatiepatiënten: knelpunten, Med Contact 47:684–686Google Scholar
- 7.Brody DS (1980) The patient's role in the clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med 93:18–22Google Scholar
- 10.Day JL (1997) 'Learning diabetes'–a multi-media learning package for patients, carers and professionals to improve chronic disease management. Med Inform 22(1):91−104Google Scholar
- 11.Ende JL, Kazis A (1989) Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Med 4:23–30Google Scholar
- 13.Giloth BE (1993) Managing hospital-based patient education. chapter16: Using technology to enhance patient education effectiveness. American Hospital Publishing, USAGoogle Scholar
- 14.Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE (1985) Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 102:502–528Google Scholar
- 15.Grueninger UJ, Goldstein MG (1990) A Conceptual framework for interactive education in practice and clinic setting. J Hum Hypertens 4(1):21–31Google Scholar
- 18.Kahn G (1993) Computer-based patient education: a progress report. MD comput 10, 93–99Google Scholar
- 19.Krishna S (1997) Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. Fam Pract 45(1):25–33Google Scholar
- 23.Marshall WR, Rothenberger LA, Bunnell SL (1984) The efficacy of personalized audiovisual patient-education materials. Fam Pract 19:659–663Google Scholar
- 28.Murphy KR (1998) Computer-based patient education. Comput Otolaryngol 31(2)Google Scholar
- 29.Orleans CT, George LK, Houpt JL, Brodie KH (1985) Health promotion in primary care – a survey of US family practitioners. Prev Med 14:636–647Google Scholar
- 32.Sechrest RC, Henry DJ (1996) Computer-based patient education: observations on effective communication in the clinical setting. J Biocommun 23(1):8–12Google Scholar
- 33.Seeman M, Evans J (1962) Alienation and learning in a hospital setting. Sociol Rev 27:772–782Google Scholar
- 36.Stamler J, Farinaro E (1980) Prevention and control of hypertension by nutrional-hygienic means, long term experience of the Chicago coronary prevention evaluation program. JAMA 234:1819–1822Google Scholar
- 37.Street RL Jr, Gold WR, Maning T (1997) Health promotion and interactive technology: theoretical applications and future directions, chapter 1: A conceptual foundation. Makwah: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- 38.Street RL Jr, Gold WR, Maning T (1997) Health promotion and interactive technology: theoretical applications and future directions, chapter 8: Patient-specific interfaces to health and decision-making information. Makwah: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar