Asymmetric cavernous sinus enlargement: a novel finding in Sturge–Weber syndrome
Enlargement of deep cerebral veins and choroid plexus engorgement are frequently reported in Sturge–Weber syndrome. We aim to describe cavernous sinus involvement in patients with this syndrome and to identify possible clinical-neuroimaging correlations.
Sixty patients with Sturge–Weber syndrome (31 females, mean age 4.5 years) and 120 age/sex-matched controls were included in this retrospective study. We performed a visual analysis to identify patients with asymmetric cavernous sinus enlargement. Then, we measured on axial T2WI the left (A), right (B), and bilateral (LL) transverse diameters of the cavernous sinus. We calculated the module of the difference |A-B| and the cavernous sinus asymmetry index as the ratio |A-B|/LL. Differences among groups were assessed by Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Clinicoradiological associations were evaluated by Fisher exact test.
We found seven subjects (11.6%) with asymmetric CS enlargement. The |A-B| and cavernous sinus asymmetry index were higher in patients with asymmetric CS enlargement compared with controls and patients without visible CS abnormalities (pB < 0.05). Asymmetric CS enlargement was always ipsilateral to facial port-wine stains (7/7), and, when present, to leptomeningeal vascular malformations (4/7). It was significantly associated with ipsilateral bone marrow changes (p = 0.013) and dilated veins (p = 0.002). Together with brain atrophy and deep venous dilatation, this sign was associated with neurological deficits (p < 0.05).
We expanded the spectrum of venous abnormalities in SWS, showing the presence of asymmetric cavernous sinus enlargement in more than one tenth of patients, likely related to increased venous drainage.
KeywordsSturge–Weber syndrome Cavernous sinus Venous abnormalities Brain MRI
Cavernous sinus asymmetry index
No funding was received for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Comi AM (2015) Sturge–Weber syndrome. Handb Clin Neurol:157–168Google Scholar
- 3.Goyal P, Mangla R, Gupta S, Malhotra A, Almast J, Sapire J, Kolar B (2018) Pediatric congenital cerebrovascular anomalies. J Neuroimaging. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12575
- 7.Benedikt RA, Brown DC, Walker R et al Sturge-Weber syndrome: cranial MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:409–415Google Scholar
- 9.Warne RR, Carney OM, Wang G et al (2018) The bone does not predict the brain in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5722
- 10.Griffiths PD, Blaser S, Boodram MB, Armstrong D, Harwood-Nash D (1996) Choroid plexus size in young children with Sturge-Weber syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:175–180Google Scholar
- 11.Griffiths PD, Boodram MB, Blaser S, Altomare F, Buncic JR, Levin AV, Jay V, Armstrong D, Harwood-Nash D (1996) Abnormal ocular enhancement in Sturge-Weber syndrome: correlation of ocular MR and CT findings with clinical and intracranial imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:749–754Google Scholar
- 12.Miao Y, Juhász C, Wu J, Tarabishy B, Lang Z, Behen ME, Kou Z, Ye Y, Chugani HT, Hu J (2011) Clinical correlates of white matter blood flow perfusion changes in Sturge-Weber syndrome: a dynamic MR perfusion-weighted imaging study. Am J Neuroradiol 32:1280–1285. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Sari S, Sari E, Akgun V, Ozcan E, Ince S, Saldir M, Babacan O, Acikel C, Basbozkurt G, Ozenc S, Yesilkaya S, Kilic C, Kara K, Vurucu S, Kocaoglu M, Yesilkaya E (2014) Measures of pituitary gland and stalk: from neonate to adolescence. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 0:1071–1076. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2014-0054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ayturk UM, Couto JA, Hann S, Mulliken JB, Williams KL, Huang AY, Fishman SJ, Boyd TK, Kozakewich HPW, Bischoff J, Greene AK, Warman ML (2016) Somatic activating mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 are associated with congenital hemangioma. Am J Hum Genet 98:789–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lim YH, Bacchiocchi A, Qiu J, Straub R, Bruckner A, Bercovitch L, Narayan D, Yale Center for Mendelian Genomics, McNiff J, Ko C, Robinson-Bostom L, Antaya R, Halaban R, Choate KA (2016) GNA14 somatic mutation causes congenital and sporadic vascular tumors by MAPK activation. Am J Hum Genet 99:443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bayoumi NHL, Elsayed EN (2018) Glaucoma in children with facial port wine stain. Eur J Ophthalmol:112067211881966. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118819668