Correlations between cervical spinal cord magnetic resonance diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging metrics and motor performance in patients with chronic ischemic brain lesions of the corticospinal tract
To investigate modifications of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) metrics in lateral white matter (WM) bundles of the cervical spinal cord in patients with previous stroke in the vascular territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA).
Twenty consecutive patients with a previous ischemic stroke of the MCA territory and a varying degree of upper motor impairment were enrolled. DKI was centered at the C3C4 and C5C6 intervertebral level.
The fractional anisotropy (FA) values in C3C4 and C5C6 were found to be significantly lower in the lateral WM bundles contralateral to the ischemic lesion and thus, in the WM bundle including the affected corticospinal tract (CST) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively), as well as mean kurtosis (MK) and axonal water fraction (AWF) values (p = 0.004 and p = 0.04. respectively). FA values correlated significantly with the Global Motor Index (GMI) both for C3C4 (ρ = 0.61, p = 0.004) and C5C6 (ρ = 0.69, p = 0.002). At C3C4, AWF correlated significantly with GMI (ρ = 0.54, p = 0.03). No correlations were found between lateral WM bundle volumes and GMI.
A reduction of anisotropy and microstructural complexity in the affected lateral WM bundle of the cervical spinal cord was observed in patients with previous ischemic stroke involving the CST. The correlations between these metrics and motor performance were statistically significant.
KeywordsDiffusion kurtosis imaging Diffusion tensor imaging Spinal cord Stroke
Axonal water fraction
Cervical spinal cord
Diffusion tensor imaging
Diffusion kurtosis imaging
Global motor index
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A (2009) Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 8:741–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-442270150-4Google Scholar
- 2.Park CH, Kou N, Boudrias MH, Playford ED, Ward NS (2013) Assessing a standardised approach to measuring corticospinal integrity after stroke with DTI. NeuroImage 2:521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.04.002.521-533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Panara V, Navarra R, Mattei PA, Piccirilli E, Cotroneo AR, Papinutto N, Henry RG, Uncini A, Caulo M (2017) Spinal cord microstructure integrating phase-sensitive inversion recovery and diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroradiology 59(8):819–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-017-1864-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Jensen JH, Helpern JA (2011) MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. 23(7):698–710. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12110927
- 13.Taber KH, Herrick RC, Weathers SW, Kumar AJ, Schomer DF, Hayman LA (1998) Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine. Radiographics 18(6):1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.18.6.9821197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7(1):13–31Google Scholar
- 32.Prados F, Ashburner J, Blaiotta C, Brosch T, Carballido-Gamio J, Cardoso MJ, Conrad BN, Datta E, David G, De Leener B, Duponte SM, Freund P, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Grussu F, Henry R, Landman BA, Ljungberg E, Lyttle B, Ourselin B, Papinutto N, Saporito S, Schlaeger R, Smith SA, Summers P, Tami R, Yiannakas MC, Zhu A, Cohen-Adad (2017) Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge. NeuroImage 152:312–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Papinutto N, Schlaeger R, Panara V, Caverzasi E, Ahn S, Johnson KJ, Zhu AH, Stern WA, Laub G, Hauser SL, Henry RG (2015) 2D phase-sensitive inversion recovery imaging to measure in vivo spinal cord gray and white matter areas in clinically feasible acquisition times. J Magn Reson Imaging 42(3):698–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Papinutto N, Schlaeger R, Panara V, Zhu AH, Caverzasi E, Stern WA, Hauser SL, Henry RG (2015) Age, gender and normalization covariates for spinal cord gray matter and total cross-sectional areas at cervical and thoracic levels: a 2D phase sensitive inversion recovery imaging study. PLoS One 10(3):e0118576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118576 Published online 2015 Mar 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Schlaeger R, Papinutto N, Panara V, Bevan C, Lobach IV, Bucci M, Caverzasi E, Gelfand JM, Green AJ, Jordan KM, Stern WA, von Büdingen HC, Waubant E, Zhu AH, Goodin DS, Cree BA, Hauser SL, Henry RG (2014) Spinal cord gray matter atrophy correlates with multiple sclerosis disability. Ann Neurol 76(4):568–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Schlaeger R, Papinutto N, Zhu AH, Lobach IV, Bevan CJ, Bucci M, Castellano A, Gelfand JM, Graves JS, Green AJ, Jordan KM, Keshavan A, Panara V, Stern WA, von Büdingen HC, Waubant E, Goodin DS, Cree BA, Hauser SL, Henry RG (2015) Association between thoracic spinal cord gray matter atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 72(8):897–904. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar