Submaximal primary angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: peri-procedural complications and long-term outcomes
- 79 Downloads
The aim of our study is to report the peri-procedural complications and long-term stroke recurrent rate of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) patients who underwent submaximal primary angioplasty.
This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients in a single center who underwent submaximal primary angioplasty between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015. The peri-procedural complications and long-term outcomes are reported.
Primary angioplasty was successfully performed in 129 patients (97.0%). The mean degree of pre-procedural stenosis was 81.9 ± 10.2%, and the degree of residual stenosis was 40.7 ± 19.1%. There were nine (6.8%) peri-procedural complications within 30 days, including seven ischemic strokes, one subarachnoid hemorrhage, and one asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. None of them resulted in death. One-year follow-up was available in 122 patients (91.7%). Three more ischemic strokes (2.3%) which were in the territory of the treated artery occurred between 30 days and 1 year. The 1-year stroke and death rate was 9.0%, including peri-procedural stroke. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 3-year stroke-free survival of 87.2%.
Submaximal primary angioplasty can be performed with a low peri-procedural complication rate and relatively good clinical outcome at long-term follow-up for symptomatic ICAS patients.
KeywordsAtherosclerosis Angioplasty Intervention Stroke
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was funded by Beijing High-Level Personnel Funds (Grant no. 2013-2-19) to ZM and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81371290) to ZM.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS et al (2014) Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 383(9914):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62038-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dumont TM, Kan P, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI (2012) Revisiting angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis after the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study. Neurosurgery 71(6):1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318271bcb8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fiorella D, Levy EI, Turk AS, Albuquerque FC, Niemann DB, Aagaard-Kienitz B et al (2007) US multicenter experience with the wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease: periprocedural results. Stroke 38(3):881–887. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000257963.65728.e8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fiorella D, Derdeyn CP, Lynn MJ, Barnwell SL, Hoh BL, Levy EI et al (2012) Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS). Stroke 43(10):2682–2688. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Marks MP, Wojak JC, Al-Ali F, Jayaraman M, Marcellus ML, Connors JJ et al (2006) Angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: clinical outcome. Stroke 37(4):1016–1020. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000206142.03677.c2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI (2000) A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21(4):643–646Google Scholar
- 19.Villwock MR, Padalino DJ, Ramaswamy R, Deshaies EM (2016) Primary angioplasty versus stenting for endovascular management of intracranial atherosclerotic disease following acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Interv Neurol 9(1):1–6Google Scholar
- 20.Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ, Chaloupka J, Lutsep H, Barnwell S et al (2008) The NIH registry on use of the wingspan stent for symptomatic70-99% intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 70(17):1518–1524. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000306308.08229.a3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar