Reply: “Developmental venous anomaly depicted incidentally in fetal MRI and confirmed in post-natal MRI”
We would like to thank Dr. Brinjikji and colleagues for their interest and comments on our recently published letter to the editor, “Developmental venous anomaly (DVA) depicted incidentally in fetal MRI and confirmed in post-natal MRI” . In their observation, Brinjikji et al. defend that many DVA actually form in post-natal life and that DVAs are not necessarily congenital lesions.
This opinion is mainly based on a study by the same group where a significant positive association between age and DVA was found . Although these results are indeed very intriguing, they also need to be interpreted with caution as the aforementioned study is not without limitations (including its retrospective nature, dependence on reporting, absence of information regarding the clinical indication of the exams except in case of tumor or epilepsy, significant differences regarding the number of patients included in each age group, absence of healthy control group, and image...
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Leach JK, Howard T, Abruzzo T (2012) Postnatal evolution of a developmental venous anomaly. J Pediatr Neuroradiol 24:135–143Google Scholar
- 8.Keppler-Noreuil KM, Rios JJ, Parker VE, Semple RK, Lindhurst MJ, Sapp JC, Alomari A, Ezaki M, Dobyns W, Biesecker LG (2015) PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS): diagnostic and testing eligibility criteria, differential diagnosis, and evaluation. Am J Med Genet A 167A(2):287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar