Sensitivity of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting developmental venous anomalies and associated cavernomas and microhemorrhages in children
Developmental venous anomalies (DVA) are common neuroimaging abnormalities that are traditionally diagnosed by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images as the gold standard. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of SWI in detecting DVA and associated cavernous malformations (CM) and microhemorrhages in children in order to determine if SWI may replace contrast-enhanced MRI sequences.
Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were used as diagnostic gold standard for DVA. The presence of DVA was qualitatively assessed on axial SWI and T2-weighted images by an experienced pediatric neuroradiologist. In addition, the presence of CM and microhemorrhages was evaluated on SWI and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.
Fifty-seven children with DVA (34 males, mean age at neuroimaging 11.2 years, range 1 month to 17.9 years) were included in this study. Forty-nine out of 57 DVA were identified on SWI (sensitivity of 86%) and 16 out of 57 DVA were detected on T2-weighted images (sensitivity of 28.1%). General anesthesia-related changes in brain hemodynamics and oxygenation were most likely responsible for the majority of SWI false negative. CM were detected in 12 patients on axial SWI, but only in six on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Associated microhemorrhages could be identified in four patients on both axial SWI and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, although more numerous and conspicuous on SWI.
SWI can identify DVA and associated cavernous malformations and microhemorrhages with high sensitivity, obviating the need for contrast-enhanced MRI sequences.
KeywordsDevelopmental venous anomaly Children Brain Magnetic resonance imaging Susceptibility-weighted imaging
We would like to thank Dr. Bruno P. Soares for his critical review of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards and patient consent
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.
For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.
- 10.Semelka RC, Ramalho M, AlObaidy M, Ramalho J (2016) Gadolinium in humans: a family of disorders. AJR Am J Roentgenol:W1–W5Google Scholar
- 17.Sedlacik J, Lobel U, Kocak M, Loeffler RB, Reichenbach JR, Broniscer A, Patay Z, Hillenbrand CM (2010) Attenuation of cerebral venous contrast in susceptibility-weighted imaging of spontaneously breathing pediatric patients sedated with propofol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:901–906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Frischer JM, God S, Gruber A, Saringer W, Grabner G, Gatterbauer B, Kitz K, Holzer S, Kronnerwetter C, Hainfellner JA, Knosp E, Trattnig S (2012) Susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 T: improved diagnosis of cerebral cavernous malformations and associated developmental venous anomalies. Neuroimage Clin 1:116–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar