Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke
- 1.4k Downloads
Despite improved acute treatment and new tools to facilitate recovery, most patients have motor deficits after stroke, often causing disability. However, motor impairment varies considerably among patients, and recovery in the acute/subacute phase is difficult to predict using clinical measures alone, particularly in severely impaired patients. Accurate early prediction of recovery would help rationalize rehabilitation goals and improve the design of trials testing strategies to facilitate recovery.
We review the role of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in predicting motor recovery after stroke, in monitoring treatment response, and in evaluating white matter remodeling. We critically appraise DTI studies and discuss their limitations, and we explore directions for future study.
Growing evidence suggests that combining clinical scores with information about corticospinal tract (CST) integrity can improve predictions about motor outcome. The extent of CST damage on DTI and/or the overlap between the CST and a lesion are key prognostic factor that determines motor performance and outcome. Three main strategies to quantify stroke-related CST damage have been proposed: (i) measuring FA distal to the stroke area, (ii) measuring the number of fibers that go through the stroke with tractography, and (iii) measuring the overlap between the stroke and a CST map derived from healthy age- and gender-matched controls.
Recovery of motor function probably involves remodeling of the CST proper and/or a greater reliance on alternative motor tracts through spontaneous and treatment-induced plasticity. DTI-metrics represent promising clinical biomarkers to predict motor recovery and to monitor and predict the response to neurorehabilitative interventions.
KeywordsStroke Recovery Rehabilitation MRI Diffusion tensor imaging
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was funded by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Health (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Reference PI060745).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 21.Song J, Nair VA, Young BM et al (2015) DTI measures track and predict motor function outcomes in stroke rehabilitation utilizing BCI technology. Front Hum Neurosci 27:9–195Google Scholar
- 41.Chen JL, Schlaug G (2016) Increased resting state connectivity between ipsilesional motor cortex and contralesional premotor cortex after transcranial direct current stimulation with physical therapy. Sci Rep 16:6–23271Google Scholar
- 48.Fozouni N, Chopp M, Nejad-Davarani SP et al (2013) Characterizing brain structures and remodeling after TBI based on information content, diffusion entropy. PLoS One 15:8–e76343Google Scholar
- 52.Crocker T, Forster A, Young J et al (2013) Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28:2–CD004294Google Scholar
- 53.Yang M, Yang YR, Li HJ et al (2015) Combining diffusion tensor imaging and gray matter volumetry to investigate motor functioning in chronic stroke. PLoS One 12:10–e0125038Google Scholar