Cortical reorganization after motor imagery training in chronic stroke patients with severe motor impairment: a longitudinal fMRI study
- 1.2k Downloads
Despite its clinical efficacy, few studies have examined the neural mechanisms of motor imagery training (MIT) in stroke. Our objective was to find the cortical reorganization patterns after MIT in chronic stroke patients.
Twenty stroke patients with severe motor deficits were randomly assigned to the MIT or conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) group, but two lost in the follow-up. All 18 patients received CRT 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Nine subjects in the MIT group received 30-min MIT 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Before and after the interventions, the upper limb section of the Fugl–Meyer Scale (FM-UL) was blindly evaluated, and functional magnetic resonance imaging was administered while the patients executed a passive fist clutch task.
Two cortical reorganization patterns were found. One pattern consisted of the growth in activation in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex (cSMC) for most patients (six in the MIT group, five in the CRT group), and the other consisted of focusing of the activation in the cSMC with increasing of the laterality index of the SMC for a small portion of patients (three in the MIT group, one in the CRT group). When we applied correlation analyses to the variables of relative ΔcSMC and ΔFM-UL in the 11 patients who experienced the first pattern, a positive relationship was detected.
Our results indicate that different cortical reorganization patterns (increases in or focusing of recruitment to the cSMC region) exist in chronic stroke patients after interventions, and patients may choose efficient patterns to improve their motor function.
KeywordsCortical reorganization Functional magnetic resonance imaging Motor imagery Rehabilitation Stroke
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81272169) and 12th Five-Year Plan supporting project of Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (grant no. 2013BAI10B03). We thank Professor Yongshan Hu and Mingxia Fan for guidance. We also thank Dazhi Yin and Lili Zang for the fMRI processes and analyses they provided. We acknowledge the generous support of the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern SM, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O’Donnell C, Roger V, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wilson M, Hong Y (2008) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 117(4):e25–e146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Calautti C, Naccarato M, Jones PS, Sharma N, Day DD, Carpenter AT, Bullmore ET, Warburton EA, Baron JC (2007) The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: a 3T fMRI study. NeuroImage 34(1):322–331. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.026 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, Waldvogel D, Wittenberg GF, Ishii K, Cohen LG, Hallett M (2006) Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain 129(Pt 3):791–808. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh713 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15(1):273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Loubinoux I, Dechaumont-Palacin S, Castel-Lacanal E, De Boissezon X, Marque P, Pariente J, Albucher JF, Berry I, Chollet F (2007) Prognostic value of FMRI in recovery of hand function in subcortical stroke patients. Cereb Cortex 17(12):2980–2987. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Dong Y, Winstein CJ, Albistegui-DuBois R, Dobkin BH (2007) Evolution of FMRI activation in the perilesional primary motor cortex and cerebellum with rehabilitation training-related motor gains after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21(5):412–428. doi: 10.1177/1545968306298598 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Askim T, Indredavik B, Vangberg T, Haberg A (2009) Motor network changes associated with successful motor skill relearning after acute ischemic stroke: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23(3):295–304. doi: 10.1177/1545968308322840 PubMedGoogle Scholar