Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 207–211 | Cite as

Peri-stent aneurysm formation following a stent implant for stenotic intracranial vertebral artery dissection: a technical report of two cases successfully treated with coil embolization

  • Hideki Ishimaru
  • Kazuaki Nakashima
  • Hideaki Takahata
  • Yohjiro Matsuoka
Interventional Neuroradiology

Abstract

Introduction

Although stenting for stenotic vertebral artery dissection (VAD) improves compromised blood flow, subsequent peri-stent aneurysm (PSA) formation is not well-known. We report two cases with PSA successfully treated with coil embolization.

Methods

Three patients with stenotic intracranial VAD underwent endovascular angioplasty at our institution because they had acute infarction in posterior circulation territory and clinical evidence of hemodynamic insufficiency. In two of three patients balloon angioplasty at first session failed to relieve the stenosis, and a coronary stent was implanted. Angiography immediately after stenting showed no abnormality in case 1 and minimal slit-like projection at proximal portion of the stent in case 2.

Results

Angiography obtained 16 months after the stenting revealed PSA in case 1. In case 2, angiography performed 3 months later showed that the projection at proximal portion enlarged and formed an aneurysm outside the stent. Because follow-up angiographies showed growth of the aneurysm in both cases, endovascular aneurysmal embolization was performed. We advanced a microcatheter into the aneurysm through the strut of existing stent and delivered detachable coils into the aneurysm lumen successfully in both cases. The post-procedural course was uneventful, and complete obliteration of aneurysm was confirmed on angiography in both cases.

Conclusion

Stenting for stenotic intracranial VAD may result in delayed PSA; therefore, follow-up angiographies would be necessary after stenting for stenotic intracranial arterial dissection. Coil embolization through the stent strut would be a solution for enlarging PSA.

Keywords

Intracranial vertebral artery dissection Ischemia Stenting Aneurysm Coiling 

Notes

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Hosoya T, Adachi M, Yamaguchi K, Haku T, Kayama T, Kato T (1999) Clinical and neuroradiological features of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissection. Stroke 30(5):1083–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ohkuma H, Suzuki S, Shimamura N, Nakano T (2003) Dissecting aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery: neuroradiological and clinical features. Neuroradiology 45(3):143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshimoto Y, Wakai S (1997) Unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection. Clinical course and serial radiographic imagings. Stroke 28(2):370–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirai T, Korogi Y, Murata Y, Ono K, Suginohara K, Uemura S, Yamashita Y (2003) Intracranial artery dissections: serial evaluation with MR imaging, MR angiography, and source images of MR angiography. Radiat Med 21(2):86–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uchino A, Sawada A, Takase Y, Kan Y, Matsuo M, Kudo S (2001) Supraclinoid carotid dissection in a pediatric patient. Clin Imaging 25(6):385–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen CJ, Tseng YC, Lee TH, Hsu HL, See LC (2004) Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(5):769–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shin YS, Kim HS, Kim SY (2007) Stenting for vertebrobasilar dissection: a possible treatment option for nonhemorrhagic vertebrobasilar dissection. Neuroradiology 49(2):149–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Willing SJ, Skidmore F, Donaldson J, Nobo UL, Chernukha K (2003) Treatment of acute intracranial vertebrobasilar dissection with angioplasty and stent placement: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24(5):985–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahn JY, Chung SS, Lee BH, Kim SH, Yoon PH, Joo JY, Kim JK (2005) Treatment of spontaneous arterial dissections with stent placement for preservation of the parent artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(3):265–273. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0436-8, discussion 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joo JY, Ahn JY, Chung YS, Han IB, Chung SS, Yoon PH, Kim SH, Choi EW (2005) Treatment of intra- and extracranial arterial dissections using stents and embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 28(5):595–602. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-0199-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahn JY, Han IB, Kim TG, Yoon PH, Lee YJ, Lee BH, Seo SH, Kim DI, Hong CK, Joo JY (2006) Endovascular treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissections with stent placement or stent-assisted coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(7):1514–1520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wakhloo AK, Mandell J, Gounis MJ, Brooks C, Linfante I, Winer J, Weaver JP (2008) Stent-assisted reconstructive endovascular repair of cranial fusiform atherosclerotic and dissecting aneurysms: long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up. Stroke 39(12):3288–3296. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512996 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abruzzo TA, Tong FC, Waldrop AS, Workman MJ, Cloft HJ, Dion JE (2007) Basilar artery stent angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial athero-occlusive disease: complications and late midterm clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(5):808–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee CY, Yim MB (2006) Primary stent therapy for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: 1-year follow-up angiographic and midterm clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg 105(2):235–241. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim DJ, Lee BH, Kim DI, Shim WH, Jeon P, Lee TH (2005) Stent-assisted angioplasty of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis: feasibility and follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(6):1381–1388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lylyk P, Cohen JE, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Miranda C (2002) Angioplasty and stent placement in intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses and dissections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(3):430–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Ali F, Cree T, Hall S, Louis S, Major K, Smoker S, Walker S (2011) Predictors of unfavorable outcome in intracranial angioplasty and stenting in a single-center comparison: results from the Borgess Medical Center-Intracranial Revascularization Registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(7):1221–1226. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2530 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Brassel F, Bruning R, Eckert B, Kamek S, Klein GE, Knauth M, Liebig T, Maskova J, Mucha D, Neumann-Haefelin T, Pilgram-Pastor S, Sitzer M, Sonnberger M, Tietke M, Trenkler J, Turowski B, Group IS (2010) In-hospital complication rates after stent treatment of 388 symptomatic intracranial stenoses: results from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry. Stroke 41(3):494–498. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.568063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aoki J, Kirtane A, Leon MB, Dangas G (2008) Coronary artery aneurysms after drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(1):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2007.10.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naito I, Iwai T, Sasaki T (2002) Management of intracranial vertebral artery dissections initially presenting without subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 51(4):930–937, discussion 937-938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee JW, Jung JY, Kim YB, Huh SK, Kim DI, Lee KC (2007) Spontaneous dissecting aneurysm of the intracranial vertebral artery: management strategies. Yonsei Med J 48(3):425–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Irie K, Negoro M, Hayakawa M, Hayashi J, Kanno T (2003) Treatment of a spontaneous intracranial dissecting aneurysm with stent-assisted coil embolization. Neuroradiology 45(11):825–829. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-0972-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sugiu K, Takahashi K, Muneta K, Ohmoto T (2004) Rebleeding of a vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm during stent-assisted coil embolization: a pitfall of the “stent and coil” technique. Surg Neurol 61(4):365–370. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00515-9, discussion 370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Provenzale JM, Sarikaya B (2009) Comparison of test performance characteristics of MRI, MR angiography, and CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review of the medical literature. AJR 193(4):1167–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benndorf G, Herbon U, Sollmann WP, Campi A (2001) Treatment of a ruptured dissecting vertebral artery aneurysm with double stent placement: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(10):1844–1848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mehta B, Burke T, Kole M, Bydon A, Seyfried D, Malik G (2003) Stent-within-a-stent technique for the treatment of dissecting vertebral artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24(9):1814–1818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, Piotin M (2012) Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 43(4):1032–1038. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    MacKay CI, Han PP, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG (2003) Recurrence of a vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysm after successful stent-supported coil embolization: case report. Neurosurgery 53(3):754–759, discussion 760-761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    He M, Zhang H, Lei D, Mao BY, You C, Xie XD, Sun H, Ju Y, Zhang JM (2009) Application of covered stent grafts for intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. J Neurosurg 110(2):418–426PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideki Ishimaru
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kazuaki Nakashima
    • 2
  • Hideaki Takahata
    • 3
  • Yohjiro Matsuoka
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical Research CenterNational Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical CenterOmuraJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyNational Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical CenterOmuraJapan
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryNational Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical CenterOmuraJapan

Personalised recommendations