, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 479–487 | Cite as

Current concepts of polymicrogyria

  • A. James BarkovichEmail author
Open Access
Topic Article


Polymicrogyria is one of the most common malformations of cortical development. It has been known for many years and its clinical and MRI manifestations are well described. Recent advances in imaging, however, have revealed that polymicrogyria has many different appearances on MR imaging, suggesting that is may be a more heterogeneous malformation than previously suspected. The clinical and imaging heterogeneity of polymicrogyria is explored in this review.


Polymicrogyria Epilepsy Malformations of cortical development Magnetic resonance imaging 


Polymicrogyria is a malformation of cortical development in which the process of normal cerebral cortical development is disturbed late in the stage of neuronal migration or early in the stage of cortical organization; thus, it is considered a disorder of neuronal organization [1]. As a result of these disturbances to the developmental process, the deeper layers of the cerebral cortex develop abnormally and multiple small gyri form within the cortex [2]. Polymicrogyria has a range of histologic appearances, all having in common a derangement of the normal six-layered lamination of the cortex, an associated derangement of sulcation, and fusion of the molecular layer across sulci [3, 4, 5]. In areas of polymicrogyria, no normal sulci are seen. Causes of polymicrogyria include congenital infection (particularly cytomegalovirus infection [6, 7]), localized or diffuse in utero ischemia [8, 9], or mutations (Table 1) [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23].
Table 1

Genes associated with polymicrogyria.

















Multiple genes


Patients with polymicrogyria may have a wide variety of clinical presentations, ranging from hemiparesis or partial epilepsy to developmental delay, quadriparesis, and medically refractory, intractable epilepsy; the neurologic disability appears to depend upon the portion[s] of brain involved, but may also depend upon the type of polymicrogyria and the presence or absence of associated anomalies. Neurologic manifestations are similar among patients who have polymicrogyria due to different causes [6, 22, 24, 25]. The severity of the clinical presentation and age at presentation depend mostly upon the extent of cortical involvement; bilateral involvement and involvement of more than half of a single hemisphere are poor prognostic indicators, portending moderate to severe developmental delay and significant motor dysfunction [25].

Polymicrogyria affects variable portions of the cerebral cortex: it may be focal, multifocal, or diffuse; it may be unilateral, bilateral, and asymmetrical; or bilateral and symmetrical. The most common location (in 60–70% of cases [26]) is around the sylvian fissure, particularly the posterior aspect of the fissure; however, any part of the cerebral cortex, including the frontal, occipital, and temporal lobes, can be affected [3, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Polymicrogyria may be an isolated malformation or it may be associated with other brain malformations; when other malformations are identified, the most common are corpus callosum agenesis and hypogenesis, cerebellar hypoplasia [29], periventricular nodular heterotopia [30], and subcortical heterotopia [31]. Affected patients may be microcephalic, normocephalic, or macrocephalic [22].

Several specific syndromes are associated with cerebral polymicrogyria (Table 2). Some of the best known of these are Aicardi syndrome (OMIM 304050 [32, 33]), Delleman syndrome (oculo-cerebral-cutaneous syndrome, OMIM 164180 [34, 35]), DiGeorge syndrome (OMIM 188400, also called the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in which several genes are deleted [19]), Warburg Micro syndrome (OMIM 600118 [36, 37, 38]), and D-bifunctional protein deficiency (OMIM 261515) [39]. Many others will likely be found.
Table 2

Multiple congenital anomaly syndromes with polymicrogyria.




Aicardi syndrome

Callosal agenesis

Not known


Heterotopia [periventricular and subcortical]

Retinal anomalies

Delleman syndrome

Callosal agenesis

Not known

Cystic microphthalmia

Frontal polymicrogyria

Periventricular heterotopia

Large, dysplastic tectum

Absent Cb vermis

DiGeorge syndrome

Parathyroid hypoplasia


Thymic hypoplasia

Cleft palate

Cardiac malformations

Facial anomalies

Polymicrogyria [perisylvian, right hemisphere preferred]

Warburg Micro syndrome




Congenital cataract

Optic atrophy

Hypogenitalism with hypotonia

Callosal hypo- or agenesis

Frontoparietal polymicrogyria

D-bifunctional protein deficiency

Generalized osteopenia


Bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria

Large anterior fontanelle

Frontal bossing

Up-slanting palpebral fissures


The imaging appearance of polymicrogyria is variable. This variability is most likely a result of three factors: imaging factors (amount of gray matter–white matter contrast, thickness of the slices); the stage of maturity/myelination of the brain at the time of the imaging study; and, in all likelihood, the type of PMG. In a previous analysis of PMG, I noted that it can have a coarse appearance or a delicate appearance and that the appearance seen in the so-called cobblestone malformations differs from that seen in most bilateral polymicrogyria syndromes [40]. The precise reasons for these differing appearances are not known, but the development of the cerebral cortex is so complex that it is not surprising that disruptions of the processes of late cortical migration and cortical organization at different stages might result in slightly different malformations. The cortical surface can have multiple small, delicate gyri (Fig. 1) or appear thick and irregularly bumpy (Fig. 2) or be paradoxically smooth (Fig. 3) because the outer cortical (molecular) layer fuses over the microsulci. Sometimes the cortex appears thick and coarse (with an appearance of “palisades” of cortex [40], (Fig. 4)), while other times the microgyri appear fine and delicate (Fig. 1), even when the brains are similarly myelinated. However, these variations in appearance may not be detectable on routine, 5-mm thick images. Therefore, images with thin sections and optimal gray matter–white matter contrast [we acquire volume 3DFT spoiled gradient acquisition (T1 weighted) and volume 3DFT fast spin echo (T2 weighted) images, both in the sagittal plane with ≤1.5 mm partition size] should always be acquired. Evaluation in three planes is often necessary to detect irregularities of the gray matter–white matter junction, which are often the most convincing evidence of dysplastic brain (Fig. 3) [41]; this is most easily accomplished via volumetric acquisition with display in all three orthogonal planes (sagittal, axial, and coronal). The volume acquisitions can be displayed as three-dimensional surface images (Fig. 5) and can be utilized for stereotactic localization, aiding in surgical therapy, if appropriate. The degree of myelination affects the appearance. In unmyelinated regions, the inner surface of the polymicrogyric cortex looks thin [2–3 mm] and bumpy, while in myelinated areas it looks thicker (5–8 mm) and relatively smooth [42]. The reason proposed for this is that a 4–5 mm layer of gliotic white matter runs through the polymicrogyric cortex, blending in with white matter in the unmyelinated brain and blending in with cortex after myelination [42]. Finally, as stated earlier, polymicrogyria is almost certainly a heterogeneous malformation that can have many different appearances: thick and coarse, fine and delicate, with shallow or deep sulci. Whatever the reason, it is important to realize that a spectrum of cortical appearances, all having some sort of small gyri, can be seen in patients with polymicrogyria.
Fig. 1

Parasagittal (a) and axial (b) T1-weighted images show the delicate appearance of PMG (black arrows) in the right sylvian and suprasylvian cortex. Note the continuity of the posterior sylvian fissure on the parasagittal image (a); this is diagnostic of perisylvian PMG

Fig. 2

Thick and irregularly bumpy, “coarse” appearance of PMG. Parasagittal (a) and axial (b) images show coarse PMG in the parieto-occipital (small black arrows) and perisylvian (large black arrows) regions

Fig. 3

Axial FSE T2 weighted image shows right frontal PMG (white arrows) with fusion of the molecular layer of cortex resulting in paradoxically smooth cortical surface

Fig. 4

Axial T1-weighted image shows diffuse coarse PMG with an appearance of “palisades” of cortex

Fig. 5

Surface rendering of PMG from volumetric acquisition of data. a Image shows a parasagittal image of extensive perisylvian coarse PMG (arrows). The surface rendering (b) shows the absence of normal sulci and the bumpy cortical surface in the affected area (arrows)

In addition to the variability of the appearance of polymicrogyria, the location of polymicrogyria is extremely variable. It may be superficial, with the cortex appearing flat and congruent to the arc of normal cortex, or may course radially inward, as if it were buckled or folded toward the ventricle. This infolding of cortex may be small or large, but close examination will show that the cortical features are similar [bumpy, irregular inner and outer cortical surfaces] in both the superficial and radially folded types. Polymicrogyria may be unilateral (∼40%) or bilateral (∼60%). The cortex surrounding the sylvian fissures is involved in ∼80% of cases, with the frontal lobe being most commonly involved (∼70%), followed by parietal (63%), temporal (38%), and occipital (7%) lobes [28]. The striate cortex, cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, and gyrus rectus are typically spared [28]. Polymicrogyria is sometimes calcified, but it is difficult to know the frequency because few patients are studied with CT. It is not clear if the calcification is of any significance. Finally, it is important to recognize that anomalous venous drainage is common in areas of dysplastic cortex [43], seen in up to 51% of patients with polymicrogyria [28]. Large vessels are especially common in regions where there is a large infolding of thickened cortex. Such large vessels, when seen in association with abnormal, thickened cortex, should not be mistaken for vascular malformations. Angiography is not indicated.

Several syndromes of bilateral symmetrical polymicrogyria have been described; these should be recognized by neuroimagers. The best known and most common of these is bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria (also called congenital bilateral perisylvian syndrome [44]). This syndrome may be sporadic or familial [15, 45]. The heterogeneous inheritance patterns suggest that mutations of several different genes can cause this malformation [45]; three locations (Xq21.33-q23 (SRPX2), 22q11.2, and Xq28) have been identified [13, 19, 20, 22]. Sporadic cases tend to present with more severe neurologic manifestations. A syndrome of developmental pseudobulbar palsy (oropharyngeal dysfunction and dysarthria, 100%), epilepsy (80–90%), mental retardation (50–80%), and, sometimes, congenital arthrogryposis has been described [44, 46, 47, 48]. Other patients are brought to attention in infancy or early childhood because of delayed development (60%), palatal dysfunction (40%), hypotonia (30%), arthrogryposis (30%), or motor deficits (25%) [47, 49]. Seizures are present in 40–60% and may be of many clinical types [47, 49]. Studies of familial cases of congenital bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria show a lower incidence of these clinical manifestations [45, 50], possibly because patients with minimal symptoms are more readily identified and examined. A developmental reading disorder and reading impairment without severe motor or cognitive handicap may be the cause of seeking medical attention in this group [51]. Bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria can be graded according to severity on MRI (with grade 1 the most severe and grade 4 the mildest) [50]: Grade 1, with perisylvian polymicrogyria extending to the frontal or occipital pole (Fig. 6); Grade 2, with polymicrogyria extending beyond the perisylvian region but not to either pole (most common, Fig. 7); Grade 3, with polymicrogyria of the perisylvian region only (Fig. 8); and Grade 4, with polymicrogyria restricted to the posterior perisylvian regions.
Fig. 6

Grade 1 perisylvian PMG. Parasagittal (a) and axial (b) T1-weighted images show coarse polymicrogyria extending from the frontal pole to the occipital pole

Fig. 7

Grade 2 perisylvian PMG. Parasagittal (a) and axial (b) images show coarse perisylvian polymicrogyria sparing the anterior frontal lobes and the occipital lobes

Fig. 8

Grade 3 perisylvian PMG. Parasagittal T1-weighted images (a) and axial T2-weighted images (b) show polymicrogyria limited to the insulae and operculae

Bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria is another well-defined syndrome [12, 52]. Affected patients are characterized by global developmental delay of at least moderate severity, seizures, disconjugate gaze, and bilateral pyramidal and cerebellar signs [52]. MR demonstrates symmetric cortical dysgenesis affecting the frontoparietal regions most severely, as well as ventriculomegaly, bilateral white matter signal changes, and small brainstem and cerebellar structures with dysmorphic cerebellar cortex (Fig. 9). The presence of the white matter changes and the posterior fossa anomalies is very uncommon for polymicrogyria syndromes. In addition, the cortical malformation itself has a slightly different appearance than that of most polymicrogyria. Indeed, the overall appearance of the brain is more similar to that of the so-called cobblestone malformations, associated with congenital muscular dystrophies and resulting from abnormalities of linkage of radial glial cells to the pial basement membrane overlying the developing cortex [53, 54]. Further research has shown that the pial basement membrane is regulated by GPR56, the gene that causes BFPP when mutated [55], and that mutations of GPR56 cause gaps in the pial basement membrane and abnormal linkage of radial glial cells to that membrane [55]. Therefore, this disorder may fit better into the cobblestone malformations. Moreover, this observation raises the question of what precisely defines polymicrogyria and whether the different types of polymicrogyria should be analyzed and distinguished.
Fig. 9

Bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria. Axial (a) and coronal (b) T2-weighted images show a different appearance to the cortex, that of multiple radially oriented neuronal components separated by fibro-glial stroma. Note the prominent cerebellar fissures and the subcortical cerebellar cysts (arrows)

Other syndromes of bilateral symmetrical polymicrogyria have been described [56]. Several groups have described patients with spastic quadriparesis and epilepsy, on whom imaging shows bilateral symmetrical frontal polymicrogyria (Fig. 10) [57]. Guerrini et al. have described patients with bilateral medial parietal-occipital polymicrogyria (Fig. 11) [27, 58]. Other patients have combinations of the above-mentioned patterns (Fig. 2); thus, it appears that any region of cortex may be involved by bilateral, symmetrical polymicrogyria [56]. A syndrome of congenital hemiplegia and epilepsy has been described in patients with large areas of unilateral polymicrogyria [59]. These patients typically present in infancy with delayed motor development. A familial syndrome of unilateral polymicrogyria has also been described [60].
Fig. 10

Bilateral frontal polymicrogyria. Axial T2-weighted image shows delicate PMG in both frontal lobes. The lateral ventricles are somewhat dilated

Fig. 11

Bilateral parasagittal parieto-occipital polymicrogyria. Parasagittal (a) and axial (b) T1-weighted images show coarse parasagittal infoldings (arrows) of polymicrogyria

A syndrome of megalencephaly with polymicrogyria and hydrocephalus has been described. Affected children present at birth or in early infancy with macrocephaly and hypotonia; delayed motor and cognitive development become evident as they grow. Epilepsy, postaxial polydactyly, cutis marmorata, midface capillary malformation, and coarse facial features are frequently present [61, 62, 63, 64, 65]. Imaging reveals ventriculomegaly (from hydrocephalus) and polymicrogyria, which is most severe in the perisylvian region (typically Grade 1 or 2). This disorder is now thought to include those previously called megalencephaly–polymicrogyria–polydactyly–hydrocephalus syndrome and macrocephaly capillary malformation syndromes [63, 64, 65].

In summary, polymicrogyria is not a single entity, but a group of disorders that has many causes and many clinical and radiological phenotypes. Imaging characteristics may be useful in helping to differentiate the different types of polymicrogyria, which may appear as one component of multiple congenital anomaly syndromes or as isolated CNS malformation. It is important for neuroimagers to acquire high-quality images in affected patients and carefully analyze the images to help to optimize the diagnosis and treatment.



A.J. Barkovich is funded by NIH R01 NS058721, R01 NS46432, and R37 NS35129.

Conflict of interest statement

I declare that I have no conflict of interest.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. 1.
    Barkovich AJ, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Guerrini R, Dobyns WB (2005) A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development. Neurology 65:1873–1887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norman MG, McGillivray BC, Kalousek DK, Hill A, Poskitt KJ (1995) Congenital malformations of the brain: pathologic, embryologic, clinical, radiologic and genetic aspects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barkovich AJ, Gressens P, Evrard P (1992) Formation, maturation, and disorders of brain neocortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 13:423–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evrard P, de Saint-Georges P, Kadhim HJ, Gadisseux J-F (1989) Pathology of prenatal encephalopathies. In: French J (ed) Child neurology and developmental disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, pp 153–176Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Englund C, Fink A, Lau C et al (2005) Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J Neurosci 25:247–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkovich AJ, Linden CL (1994) Congenital cytomegalovirus infection of the brain: imaging analysis and embryologic considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:703–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright R, Johnson D, Neumann M et al (1997) Congenital lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus syndrome: a disease that mimics congenital toxoplasmosis or Cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 100:E9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hallervorden J (1949) Ueber eine Kohlenoxydvergiftung im Fetalleben mit Entwicklunsstorung der Hirnrinde. Allg Z Psychiatr 124:289–298Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barkovich AJ, Rowley HA, Bollen A (1995) Correlation of prenatal events with the development of polymicrogyria. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:822–827PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bingham PM, Lynch D, McDonald-McGinn D, Zackai E (1998) Polymicrogyria in chromosome 22 deletion syndrome. Neurology 51:1500–1502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuzniecky R (1994) Familial diffuse cortical dysplasia. Arch Neurol 51:307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piao X, Basel-Vanagaite L, Straussberg R et al (2002) An autosomal recessive form of bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria maps to chromosome 16q12.2–21. Am J Hum Genet 70:1028–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Villard L, Nguyen K, Cardoso C et al (2002) A locus for bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria maps to Xq28. Am J Hum Genet 70:1003–1008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caraballo RH, Cersósimo RO, Mazza E, Fejerman N (2000) Focal polymicrogyria in mother and son. Brain Develop 22:336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borgatti R, Triulzi F, Zucca C et al (1999) Bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria in three generations. Neurology 52:1910–1913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leventer RJ, Lese CM, Cardosi C, Rosenberry J, Weiss A, Stoodley N (2001) A study of 220 patients with polymicrogyria deliniates distinct phenotypes and reveals genetic loci on chromosome 1p, 2p, 6q, 21q, 22q, and Xq. Am J Hum Genet 69:177Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brooks AS, Bertoli-Avella AM, Burzynski GM et al (2005) Homozygous nonsense mutations in KIAA1279 are associated with malformations of the central and enteric nervous systems. Am J Hum Genet 77:120–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aligianis IA, Johnson CA, Gissen P et al (2005) Mutations of the catalytic subunit of RAB3GAP cause Warburg Micro syndrome. Nat Genet 37:221–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robin N, Taylor C, McDonald-McGinn D et al (2006) Polymicrogyria and deletion22q11.2 syndrome: window to the etiology of a common cortical malformation. Am J Med Genet A 140:2416–2425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roll P, Rudolf G, Pereira S et al (2006) SRPX2 mutations in disorders of language cortex and cognition. Hum Mol Genet 15:1195–1207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baala L, Briault S, Etchevers HC et al (2007) Homozygous silencing of T-box transcription factor EOMES leads to microcephaly with polymicrogyria and corpus callosum agenesis. Nat Genet 39:454–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dobyns WB, Mirzaa G, Christian SL et al (2008) Consistent chromosome abnormalities identify novel polymicrogyria loci in 1p36.3, 2p16.1–p23.1, 4q21.21–q22.1, 6q26–q27, and 21q2. Am J Med Genet Part A 146A:1637–1654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jaglin XH, Poirier K, Saillour Y et al (2009) Mutations in the beta-tubulin gene TUBB2B result in asymmetrical polymicrogyria. Nat Genet 41:746–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guerrini R, Dravet C, Raybaud C et al (1992) Epilepsy and focal gyral anomalies detected by MRI: electroclinico-morphological correlations and follow-up. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:706–718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO (1992) Non-lissencephalic cortical dysplasia: correlation of imaging findings with clinical deficits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 13:95–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leventer R (2007) Polymicrogyria and related disorders of cortical development: a clinical, imaging, and genetic study. In: Child Health Institute. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne 411Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guerrini R, Dubeau F, Dulac O et al (1997) Bilateral parasagittal parietooccipital polymicrogyria and epilepsy. Ann Neurol 41:65–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hayashi N, Tsutsumi Y, Barkovich AJ (2002) Morphological features and associated anomalies of schizencephaly in the clinical population: detailed analysis of MR images. Neuroradiology 44:418–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barkovich AJ, Millen KJ, Dobyns WB (2007) A developmental classification of malformations of the brainstem. Ann Neurol 62:625–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wieck G, Leventer RJ, Squier WM et al (2005) Periventricular nodular heterotopia with overlying polymicrogyria. Brain 128:2811–2821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barkovich AJ (2000) Morphology of subcortical heterotopia: a magnetic resonance study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:290–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aicardi J (2005) Aicardi syndrome. Brain Develop 27:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aicardi J, Lefebre J, Lerrique-Koechlin A (1965) A new syndrome: spasm in flexion, callosal agenesis, ocular abnormalities. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 19:609–610Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moog U, Jones MC, Bird LM, Dobyns WB (2005) Oculocerebrocutaneous syndrome: the brain malformation defines a core phenotype. J Med Genet 42:913–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pascual-Castroviejo I, Pascual-Pascual SI, Velazquez-Fragua R, Lapunzina P (2005) Oculocerebrocutaneous [Delleman] syndrome: report of two cases. Neuropediatrics 36:50–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Warburg M, Sjo O, Fledelius H, Pederson S (1993) Autosomal recessive microcephaly, microcornea, congenital cataract, mental retardation, optic atrophy, and hypogenitalism. Micro syndrome. Am J Dis Child 12:1309–1312Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nassogne M, Henrot B, Saint-Martin C, Kadhim H, Dobyns W, Sebire G (2000) Polymicrogyria and motor neuropathy in Micro syndrome. Neuropediatrics 31:218–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graham JM Jr, Hennekam R, Dobyns WB, Roeder E, Busch D (2004) MICRO syndrome: an entity distinct from COFS syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 128:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferdinandusse S, Denis S, Mooyer PAW et al (2006) Clinical and biochemical spectrum of D-bifunctional protein deficiency. Ann Neurol 59:92–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barkovich AJ (2009) MRI analysis of sulcation morphology in polymicrogyria. EpilepsiaGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Raybaud C, Girard N, Canto-Moreira N, Poncet M (1996) High-definition magnetic resonance imaging identification of cortical dysplasias: micropolygyria versus lissencephaly. In: Guerrini R, Andermann F, Canapicchi R, Roger J, Zifkin B, Pfanner P (eds) Dysplasias of cerebral cortex and epilepsy. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 131–143Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takanashi J, Barkovich A (2003) The changing MR imaging appearance of polymicrogyria: a consequence of myelination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:788–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barkovich AJ (1988) Abnormal vascular drainage in anomalies of neuronal migration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:939–942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kuzniecky R, Andermann F, Guerrini R (1993) Congenital bilateral perisylvian syndrome: study of 31 patients. The congenital bilateral perisylvian syndrome milticenter collaborative study. Lancet 341:608–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guerreiro MM, Andermann E, Guerrini R et al (2000) Familial perisylvian polymicrogyria: a new familial syndrome of cortical maldevelopment. Ann Neurol 48:39–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Guerrini R, Dravet C, Raybaud C et al (1992) Neurological findings and seizure outcome in children with bilateral opercular macrogyric-like changes detected by MRI. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:694–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gropman AL, Barkovich AJ, Vezina LG, Conry JA, Dubovsky EC, Packer RJ (1997) Pediatric congenital bilateral perisylvian syndrome: clinical and MRI features in 12 patients. Neuropediatrics 28:198–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Becker PS, Dixon AM, Troncoso JC (1989) Bilateral opercular polymicrogyria. Ann Neurol 25:90–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rolland Y, Adamsbaum C, Sellier N, Robain O, Ponsot G, Kalifa G (1995) Opercular malformations: clinical and MRI features in 11 children. Pediatr Radiol 25:S2–S8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jansen A, Andermann E (2005) Genetics of the polymicrogyria syndromes. J Med Genet 42:369–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Oliveira EPM, Hage SRV, Guimaraes C et al (2008) Characterization of language and reading skills in familial polymicrogyria. Brain Dev 30:254–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chang B, Piao X, Bodell A et al (2003) Bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria: clinical and radiological features in 10 families with linkage to chromosome 16. Ann Neurol 53:596–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moore SA, Saito F, Chen J et al (2002) Deletion of brain dystroglycan recapitulates aspects of congenital muscular dystrophy. Nature 418:422–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Michele DE, Barresi R, Kangawa M et al (2002) Post-translational disruption of dystroglycan-ligand interactions in congenital muscular dystrophies. Nature 418:417–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Li S, Jin Z, Koirala S et al (2008) GPR56 regulates pial basement membrane integrity and cortical lamination. J Neurosci 28:5817–5826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Barkovich AJ, Hevner R, Guerrini R (1999) Syndromes of bilateral symmetrical polymicrogyria. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1814–1821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Guerrini R, Barkovich A, Sztriha L, Dobyns W (2000) Bilateral frontal polymicrogyria. Neurology 54:909–913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Guerrini R, Dulac O, Canapicchi R et al (1994) Epilepsie révélatrice d’une dysplasie corticale occipito-pariétale parasagittale bilatérale. Epilepsies 6:131–139Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pascual-Castroviejo I, Pascual-Pascual S, Viano J, Martinez V, Palencia R (2001) Unilateral polymicrogyria: a common cause of hemiplegia of prenatal origin. Brain Dev 23:216–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chang BS, Apse KA, Caraballo R et al (2006) A famillial syndrome of unilateral polymicrogyria affecting the right hemisphere. Neurology 66:133–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Moore C, Toriello H, Abuelo D et al (1997) Macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita: a distinct disorder with developmental delay and connective tissue abnormalities. Am J Med Genet 70:67–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Giuliano F, David A, Edery P et al (2004) Macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita: seven cases including two with unusual cerebral manifestations. Am J Med Genet A 126A:99–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mirzaa G, Dodge NN, Glass I et al (2004) Megalencephaly and perisylvian polymicrogyria with postaxial polydactyly and hydrocephalus: a rare brain malformation syndrome associated with mental retardation and seizures. Neuropediatrics 35:353–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Garavelli L, Guareschi E, Errico S et al (2007) Megalencephaly and Perisylvian Polymicrogyria with Postaxial Polydactyly and Hydrocephalus [MPPH]: report of a new case. Neuropediatrics 38:200–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gripp KW, Hopkins E, Vinkler C et al (2009) Significant overlap and possible identity of macrocephaly capillary malformation and megalencephaly polymicrogyria-polydactyly hydrocephalus syndromes. Am J Med Genet A 149A:868–876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuroradiology, Room L371University of California at San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations