18F-FDG PET/CT findings of sinonasal inverted papilloma with or without coexistent malignancy: comparison with MR imaging findings in eight patients
- 317 Downloads
Sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is known for high rate of associated malignancy. The purpose of this study was to identify 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of sinonasal IPs. We also tried to compare the PET/CT findings with the MR imaging findings.
We retrospectively reviewed PET/CT and MR images of eight patients with sinonasal IP with (n = 6) or without (n = 2) coexistent squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Particular attention was paid to correlate the PET/CT findings with the MR imaging findings in terms of area distribution of standard uptake values (SUVs) and a convoluted cerebriform pattern (CCP).
In two benign IPs, the maximum SUVs measured 8.2 and 7.8, respectively (mean, 8.0). In both tumors, MR images demonstrated a diffuse CCP. In six IPs with coexistent SCC, the maximum SUVs ranged from 13.3 to 31.9 (mean ± SD, 20.2 ± 6.6). In these tumors, MR images demonstrated a diffuse CCP in two, a partial CCP in three, and no CCP in one. A wide discrepancy was noted between MR imaging and PET/CT in terms of area distribution of a CCP and SUVs.
In sinonasal lesions with MR imaging features of IP, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrating avid FDG uptake does not necessarily imply the presence of coexistent malignancy. In our small series, although IPs containing foci of SCC had consistently higher SUVs than IPs without SCC, the limited literature on this subject suggests that PET cannot be used reliably to make the distinction.
KeywordsPositron-emission tomography/CT Magnetic resonance imaging Sinonasal neoplasm Inverted papilloma
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
- 15.Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H et al (2004) Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22:4357–4368. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.120 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Barnes L, Tse LLY, Hunt JL (2005) Schneidrian papillomas. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichert P et al (eds) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. ARC, Lyon, pp 28–32Google Scholar
- 25.Nowak B, Di Martino E, Janicke S et al (1999) Diagnostic evaluation of malignant head and neck cancer by F-18-FDG PET compared to CT/MRI. Nucl Med (Stuttg) 38:312–318Google Scholar